Weight-Bearing Monitoring Devices in Lower Extremity Fractures: A Scoping Review.

IF 1.7 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopedic Research and Reviews Pub Date : 2025-06-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/ORR.S521013
Jackson Robinson, Alice Wei Ting Wang, David J Stockton
{"title":"Weight-Bearing Monitoring Devices in Lower Extremity Fractures: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Jackson Robinson, Alice Wei Ting Wang, David J Stockton","doi":"10.2147/ORR.S521013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Orthopaedic surgeons commonly prescribe weight-bearing parameters for their patients for a variety of reasons. Weight-bearing may be limited in order to control the healing environment, but advancing a patient's weight-bearing status is preferably done as quickly as possible to maximize functional recovery. However, it is entirely unclear to what extent these prescriptions are followed in practice. The purpose of this scoping review is to identify and compare non-invasive devices used for the measurement of weight-bearing following lower extremity fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Database searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were completed to identify relevant studies. Titles were screened for relevance, and abstracts were screened against the eligibility criteria. We identified studies that investigated the use of external force, pedal pressure, or activity monitoring devices used in adults after lower extremity fractures and excluded studies involving compartment pressure measurement.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Sixty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. About 39% of studies used an insole-type device, which could be worn in a shoe or integrated into a removable boot. Other device types included step count or activity monitors (52%), force plates (18%), pressure film (2%) and external pedobarography systems (27%).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>We found that different monitors offered varying types of measurements and are suitable for a variety of applications. Therefore, selecting the ideal device depends on the metric of interest. Further high-quality prospective studies utilizing device monitoring are needed to validate the theory that early weight-bearing is beneficial and safe for patients with lower extremity fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":19608,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Research and Reviews","volume":"17 ","pages":"257-267"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12191147/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedic Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S521013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Orthopaedic surgeons commonly prescribe weight-bearing parameters for their patients for a variety of reasons. Weight-bearing may be limited in order to control the healing environment, but advancing a patient's weight-bearing status is preferably done as quickly as possible to maximize functional recovery. However, it is entirely unclear to what extent these prescriptions are followed in practice. The purpose of this scoping review is to identify and compare non-invasive devices used for the measurement of weight-bearing following lower extremity fractures.

Methods: Database searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were completed to identify relevant studies. Titles were screened for relevance, and abstracts were screened against the eligibility criteria. We identified studies that investigated the use of external force, pedal pressure, or activity monitoring devices used in adults after lower extremity fractures and excluded studies involving compartment pressure measurement.

Findings: Sixty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. About 39% of studies used an insole-type device, which could be worn in a shoe or integrated into a removable boot. Other device types included step count or activity monitors (52%), force plates (18%), pressure film (2%) and external pedobarography systems (27%).

Interpretation: We found that different monitors offered varying types of measurements and are suitable for a variety of applications. Therefore, selecting the ideal device depends on the metric of interest. Further high-quality prospective studies utilizing device monitoring are needed to validate the theory that early weight-bearing is beneficial and safe for patients with lower extremity fractures.

下肢骨折负重监测装置:范围综述。
背景:出于各种原因,骨科医生通常会给患者开具负重参数。为了控制愈合环境,可能会限制负重,但最好尽快提高患者的负重状态,以最大限度地恢复功能。然而,目前还完全不清楚这些处方在实践中得到了多大程度的遵守。本综述的目的是鉴别和比较用于测量下肢骨折后负重的非侵入性装置。方法:检索MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Central)数据库,确定相关研究。对题目进行相关性筛选,对摘要进行资格标准筛选。我们确定了调查在成人下肢骨折后使用外力、踏板压力或活动监测装置的研究,排除了涉及室压测量的研究。结果:62项研究符合纳入标准。大约39%的研究使用了鞋垫式装置,它可以穿在鞋子里,也可以集成到可移动的靴子里。其他设备类型包括步数或活动监测器(52%)、测力板(18%)、压力膜(2%)和外部足检系统(27%)。解释:我们发现不同的监视器提供不同类型的测量,适用于各种应用。因此,选择理想的设备取决于感兴趣的度量。需要进一步利用器械监测的高质量前瞻性研究来验证早期负重对下肢骨折患者有益和安全的理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopedic Research and Reviews
Orthopedic Research and Reviews Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopedic Research and Reviews is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on the patho-physiology of the musculoskeletal system, trauma, surgery and other corrective interventions to restore mobility and function. Advances in new technologies, materials, techniques and pharmacological agents will be particularly welcome. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Patho-physiology and bioengineering, Technologies and materials science, Surgical techniques, including robotics, Trauma management and care, Treatment including pharmacological and non-pharmacological, Rehabilitation and Multidisciplinarian care approaches, Patient quality of life, satisfaction and preference, Health economic evaluations. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, basic science and technology, clinical studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, case reports and extended reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信