Repair Bond Strength in Hybrid Ceramic Preconditioned With Ho: YAG Laser and Toluidine Blue, Activated by Low-Level Laser Therapy, Using Composites With Varying Viscosities: An Analysis of Surface Topography and Elemental Analysis.

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q2 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY
Nourah N Shono, Fahad Alkhudhairy
{"title":"Repair Bond Strength in Hybrid Ceramic Preconditioned With Ho: YAG Laser and Toluidine Blue, Activated by Low-Level Laser Therapy, Using Composites With Varying Viscosities: An Analysis of Surface Topography and Elemental Analysis.","authors":"Nourah N Shono, Fahad Alkhudhairy","doi":"10.1002/jemt.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current study is designed to evaluate and contrast the effectiveness of several pretreatment techniques, such as airborne particle abrasion (APA), toluidine blue (TBO) activated by low-level laser therapy (LLLT), and the Ho: YAG (Holmium: yttrium aluminum garnet crystal) laser, along with composite repair materials of varying viscosities, on the surface roughness (Ra) and repair bond strength (RBS) of hybrid ceramics (HBC). Seventy-eight discs of HBC measuring 3 × 8 × 10 mm were obtained from Vita Enamic hybrid ceramics. The discs were then arbitrarily allocated into three groups based on the conditioning techniques that is, APA, Ho: YAG laser, and TBO activated by LLLT (n = 26). The Ra of five specimens from each group following conditioning were quantified utilizing a contact profilometer and one disc from each group was utilized for surface topography assessment under scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The remaining 20 discs from each group were further divided into two subgroups based on the type of composite resin (n = 10). Microhybrid composite (A) and a low viscosity injectable composite (B). Following bonding with different composite types all samples underwent thermocycling. RBS and failure mode analysis were performed with the universal testing machine and stereomicroscope respectively. The data concerning Ra and bond strength was subjected to ANOVA and Tukey Post Hoc test to identify significantly different outcomes among tested groups (p = 0.05). The maximum scores of mean Ra were displayed by Group 2 (Ho: YAG laser) (1234.33 ± 0.035 μm) pretreated discs. Whereas Group 3 (TBO activated by LLLT) (987.12 ± 0.012 μm) conditioned samples exhibited the lowest outcomes of Ra. The highest scores of RBS were presented by Group 2B (Ho: YAG laser + Injectable composite) (12.83 ± 0.22 MPa). Conversely, the lowest mean RBS value was recorded in Group 3A (TBO activated by LLLT + Microhybrid composite) (10.21 ± 0.24 MPa) Repairing CAD/CAM-HBC materials, using a Ho: YAG laser for surface conditioning proves to be the most effective approach. Regardless of the surface treatment chosen, using injectable composite as the repair material results in improved RBS.</p>","PeriodicalId":18684,"journal":{"name":"Microscopy Research and Technique","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microscopy Research and Technique","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.70017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current study is designed to evaluate and contrast the effectiveness of several pretreatment techniques, such as airborne particle abrasion (APA), toluidine blue (TBO) activated by low-level laser therapy (LLLT), and the Ho: YAG (Holmium: yttrium aluminum garnet crystal) laser, along with composite repair materials of varying viscosities, on the surface roughness (Ra) and repair bond strength (RBS) of hybrid ceramics (HBC). Seventy-eight discs of HBC measuring 3 × 8 × 10 mm were obtained from Vita Enamic hybrid ceramics. The discs were then arbitrarily allocated into three groups based on the conditioning techniques that is, APA, Ho: YAG laser, and TBO activated by LLLT (n = 26). The Ra of five specimens from each group following conditioning were quantified utilizing a contact profilometer and one disc from each group was utilized for surface topography assessment under scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The remaining 20 discs from each group were further divided into two subgroups based on the type of composite resin (n = 10). Microhybrid composite (A) and a low viscosity injectable composite (B). Following bonding with different composite types all samples underwent thermocycling. RBS and failure mode analysis were performed with the universal testing machine and stereomicroscope respectively. The data concerning Ra and bond strength was subjected to ANOVA and Tukey Post Hoc test to identify significantly different outcomes among tested groups (p = 0.05). The maximum scores of mean Ra were displayed by Group 2 (Ho: YAG laser) (1234.33 ± 0.035 μm) pretreated discs. Whereas Group 3 (TBO activated by LLLT) (987.12 ± 0.012 μm) conditioned samples exhibited the lowest outcomes of Ra. The highest scores of RBS were presented by Group 2B (Ho: YAG laser + Injectable composite) (12.83 ± 0.22 MPa). Conversely, the lowest mean RBS value was recorded in Group 3A (TBO activated by LLLT + Microhybrid composite) (10.21 ± 0.24 MPa) Repairing CAD/CAM-HBC materials, using a Ho: YAG laser for surface conditioning proves to be the most effective approach. Regardless of the surface treatment chosen, using injectable composite as the repair material results in improved RBS.

用低强度激光治疗激活的Ho: YAG激光和甲苯胺蓝预处理混合陶瓷的修复粘合强度:表面形貌分析和元素分析。
目前的研究旨在评估和对比几种预处理技术的有效性,如空气颗粒磨损(APA)、低水平激光治疗(LLLT)激活的甲苯胺蓝(TBO)和Ho: YAG(钬:钇铝石榴石晶体)激光,以及不同粘度的复合修复材料,对杂化陶瓷(HBC)的表面粗糙度(Ra)和修复结合强度(RBS)。从Vita搪瓷杂化陶瓷中获得了78个尺寸为3 × 8 × 10 mm的HBC圆盘。然后根据调节技术将椎间盘随机分为三组,即APA、Ho: YAG激光和LLLT激活的TBO (n = 26)。利用接触轮廓仪定量测定各组5个样品的Ra,并利用扫描电镜(SEM)对每组1个样品的表面形貌进行评估。每组剩余的20个椎间盘根据复合树脂的类型进一步分为两个亚组(n = 10)。微混合复合材料(A)和低粘度可注射复合材料(B)。在与不同类型的复合材料结合后,所有样品都进行了热循环。用万能试验机和体视显微镜分别进行了RBS和失效模式分析。有关Ra和粘结强度的数据进行方差分析和Tukey Post Hoc检验,以确定实验组之间的结果有显著差异(p = 0.05)。第2组(Ho: YAG激光)预处理椎间盘平均Ra评分最高(1234.33±0.035 μm)。而第3组(TBO由LLLT激活)(987.12±0.012 μm)条件下样品的Ra效果最低。2B组(Ho: YAG激光+可注射复合材料)的RBS评分最高(12.83±0.22 MPa)。相反,3A组(TBO由LLLT +微杂化复合材料激活)的平均RBS值最低(10.21±0.24 MPa)。修复CAD/CAM-HBC材料时,使用Ho: YAG激光进行表面处理是最有效的方法。无论选择何种表面处理,使用可注射复合材料作为修复材料都会改善RBS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microscopy Research and Technique
Microscopy Research and Technique 医学-解剖学与形态学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
233
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: Microscopy Research and Technique (MRT) publishes articles on all aspects of advanced microscopy original architecture and methodologies with applications in the biological, clinical, chemical, and materials sciences. Original basic and applied research as well as technical papers dealing with the various subsets of microscopy are encouraged. MRT is the right form for those developing new microscopy methods or using the microscope to answer key questions in basic and applied research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信