Incidence of Complications After Minimally Invasive Lapidus Surgery.

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Taylor C Fullmer, Rosemary J Thompson, Andrew D Elliott
{"title":"Incidence of Complications After Minimally Invasive Lapidus Surgery.","authors":"Taylor C Fullmer, Rosemary J Thompson, Andrew D Elliott","doi":"10.7547/24-037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, the Lapidus procedure has undergone adaptation to embrace the minimally invasive guidelines that are currently gaining traction in the United States. However, because of the steep learning curve associated with minimally invasive surgery and the lack of literature based on long-term outcomes, the procedure is still a long way from replacing open surgical techniques. To date, the incidence of complications with this updated technique has not been evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the incidence of complications for the Lapidus procedure. We conducted a systematic review of electronic databases and relevant peer-reviewed sources as outlined by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for the preparation of systematic reviews. Studies that included the minimally invasive surgical technique of Lapidus (or tarsometatarsal fusion), used fixation, had a minimum average follow-up of 6 months, and included complications were considered. Some of the studies included patients with concomitant procedures. The included studies did not report on comorbidities. Cadaveric studies, technique guides, and non-English studies were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of five studies were identified that met our inclusion criteria, with a total of 162 feet included. Total incidence of complications was 12.3% (n = 20) and the most commonly reported complications included hardware pain (n = 9), nonunion (n = 5), deformity recurrence (n = 3), and neurovascular injury (n = 3).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our systematic review revealed that this updated minimally invasive surgical technique provides a safe and reproducible surgical option for correcting deformities of the first ray requiring tarsometatarsal fusion, with an incidence of complications lower than what is currently reported in the literature for open variations of the procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":17241,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association","volume":"115 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7547/24-037","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In recent years, the Lapidus procedure has undergone adaptation to embrace the minimally invasive guidelines that are currently gaining traction in the United States. However, because of the steep learning curve associated with minimally invasive surgery and the lack of literature based on long-term outcomes, the procedure is still a long way from replacing open surgical techniques. To date, the incidence of complications with this updated technique has not been evaluated.

Methods: The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the incidence of complications for the Lapidus procedure. We conducted a systematic review of electronic databases and relevant peer-reviewed sources as outlined by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for the preparation of systematic reviews. Studies that included the minimally invasive surgical technique of Lapidus (or tarsometatarsal fusion), used fixation, had a minimum average follow-up of 6 months, and included complications were considered. Some of the studies included patients with concomitant procedures. The included studies did not report on comorbidities. Cadaveric studies, technique guides, and non-English studies were excluded.

Results: A total of five studies were identified that met our inclusion criteria, with a total of 162 feet included. Total incidence of complications was 12.3% (n = 20) and the most commonly reported complications included hardware pain (n = 9), nonunion (n = 5), deformity recurrence (n = 3), and neurovascular injury (n = 3).

Conclusions: Our systematic review revealed that this updated minimally invasive surgical technique provides a safe and reproducible surgical option for correcting deformities of the first ray requiring tarsometatarsal fusion, with an incidence of complications lower than what is currently reported in the literature for open variations of the procedure.

微创Lapidus手术后并发症的发生率。
背景:近年来,Lapidus手术经历了调整,以适应目前在美国获得牵引力的微创指南。然而,由于与微创手术相关的陡峭的学习曲线和缺乏基于长期结果的文献,该手术距离取代开放手术技术还有很长的路要走。迄今为止,这种新技术的并发症发生率尚未得到评估。方法:本系统综述的目的是确定Lapidus手术的并发症发生率。我们对电子数据库和相关的同行评议来源进行了系统的综述,概述了系统综述的首选报告项目和荟萃分析指南。包括微创Lapidus手术技术(或跗跖骨融合术)的研究,使用固定,平均随访时间至少为6个月,并考虑并发症。一些研究包括了伴随手术的患者。纳入的研究未报告合并症。排除了尸体研究、技术指南和非英语研究。结果:共有5项研究符合我们的纳入标准,共纳入162英尺。并发症的总发生率为12.3% (n = 20),最常见的并发症包括硬体疼痛(n = 9)、骨不连(n = 5)、畸形复发(n = 3)和神经血管损伤(n = 3)。结论:我们的系统综述显示,这种最新的微创手术技术为纠正需要跗跖骨融合的第一道线畸形提供了一种安全且可重复的手术选择,其并发症发生率低于目前文献中报道的开放性手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, the official journal of the Association, is the oldest and most frequently cited peer-reviewed journal in the profession of foot and ankle medicine. Founded in 1907 and appearing 6 times per year, it publishes research studies, case reports, literature reviews, special communications, clinical correspondence, letters to the editor, book reviews, and various other types of submissions. The Journal is included in major indexing and abstracting services for biomedical literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信