Insomnia Subtypes in Clinical Population According to the Insomnia Type Questionnaire (ITQ): A Multi-Centre Study in Spanish Sleep Clinics.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Francesca Canellas, Manuel de Entrambasaguas, Odile Romero, Ainhoa Álvarez, Rybel Wix, Francisco Javier Puertas, Jesús Pujol, Guillem Frontera
{"title":"Insomnia Subtypes in Clinical Population According to the Insomnia Type Questionnaire (ITQ): A Multi-Centre Study in Spanish Sleep Clinics.","authors":"Francesca Canellas, Manuel de Entrambasaguas, Odile Romero, Ainhoa Álvarez, Rybel Wix, Francisco Javier Puertas, Jesús Pujol, Guillem Frontera","doi":"10.1111/jsr.70116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The lack of robust subtyping for insomnia disorder (ID) led to its current classification as a uniform condition. A novel approach to subtyping ID developed a new tool, the insomnia type questionnaire (ITQ). Our research aimed to assess whether the ID subtypes identified in the general population could also be found in ID patients referred to sleep clinics in a multi-centre study throughout Spain, and to gather insights for the management of complex ID patients. The ITQ classified ID patients into the five previously described subtypes: Type 1 = 35.1%, Type 2 = 12%, Type 3 = 46.7%, Type 4 = 5.8% and Type 5 = 0.4%. Compared to the general population, there was an overrepresentation of Types 1 and 3, consistently across all participating clinical centres. The total self-reported sleep duration was 4.7 (SD 1.2) h, with no significant differences between subtypes. Type 1 patients had significantly higher scores in the Insomnia Severity Index, Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology self-rated and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Type 3 patients were more worried about their sleep. Type 4 had the lowest depression and anxiety scores. ITQ subtyping showed that ID patients attending sleep clinics had high scores in depression, specially Type 1 patients, who probably need a differentiated therapeutic approach. The over-representation of Type 3 patients suggests that they are more worried about their sleep than the other subtypes. These findings highlight the difficulties faced by sleep clinicians to treat complex and refractory-toto-treatment ID patients and those with comorbid insomnia.</p>","PeriodicalId":17057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sleep Research","volume":" ","pages":"e70116"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sleep Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.70116","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The lack of robust subtyping for insomnia disorder (ID) led to its current classification as a uniform condition. A novel approach to subtyping ID developed a new tool, the insomnia type questionnaire (ITQ). Our research aimed to assess whether the ID subtypes identified in the general population could also be found in ID patients referred to sleep clinics in a multi-centre study throughout Spain, and to gather insights for the management of complex ID patients. The ITQ classified ID patients into the five previously described subtypes: Type 1 = 35.1%, Type 2 = 12%, Type 3 = 46.7%, Type 4 = 5.8% and Type 5 = 0.4%. Compared to the general population, there was an overrepresentation of Types 1 and 3, consistently across all participating clinical centres. The total self-reported sleep duration was 4.7 (SD 1.2) h, with no significant differences between subtypes. Type 1 patients had significantly higher scores in the Insomnia Severity Index, Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology self-rated and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Type 3 patients were more worried about their sleep. Type 4 had the lowest depression and anxiety scores. ITQ subtyping showed that ID patients attending sleep clinics had high scores in depression, specially Type 1 patients, who probably need a differentiated therapeutic approach. The over-representation of Type 3 patients suggests that they are more worried about their sleep than the other subtypes. These findings highlight the difficulties faced by sleep clinicians to treat complex and refractory-toto-treatment ID patients and those with comorbid insomnia.

根据失眠类型问卷(ITQ)的临床人群失眠亚型:西班牙睡眠诊所的一项多中心研究
失眠障碍(ID)缺乏强大的亚型导致其目前被分类为统一的条件。一种新的方法开发了一种新的工具,失眠类型问卷(ITQ)。我们的研究旨在评估在西班牙进行的一项多中心研究中,在一般人群中发现的ID亚型是否也可以在转介到睡眠诊所的ID患者中发现,并为复杂ID患者的管理收集见解。ITQ将ID患者分为先前描述的五种亚型:1型= 35.1%,2型= 12%,3型= 46.7%,4型= 5.8%,5型= 0.4%。与一般人群相比,在所有参与的临床中心,1型和3型患者的比例过高。自我报告的总睡眠时间为4.7 (SD 1.2) h,各亚型之间无显著差异。1型患者在失眠严重程度指数、抑郁症状自评量表和状态-特质焦虑量表上得分显著高于对照组。3型患者更担心他们的睡眠。4型患者的抑郁和焦虑得分最低。ITQ分型显示,在睡眠诊所就诊的ID患者在抑郁方面得分较高,尤其是1型患者,他们可能需要差异化的治疗方法。3型患者的过度表现表明,他们比其他类型的患者更担心自己的睡眠。这些发现突出了睡眠临床医生在治疗复杂和难治性失眠患者和合并症失眠患者时所面临的困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sleep Research
Journal of Sleep Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
6.80%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sleep Research is dedicated to basic and clinical sleep research. The Journal publishes original research papers and invited reviews in all areas of sleep research (including biological rhythms). The Journal aims to promote the exchange of ideas between basic and clinical sleep researchers coming from a wide range of backgrounds and disciplines. The Journal will achieve this by publishing papers which use multidisciplinary and novel approaches to answer important questions about sleep, as well as its disorders and the treatment thereof.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信