Paulo Otavio Maluf Perin, Cassia Berbel, Maria Laura Costa, José Paulo de Siqueira Guida
{"title":"Analysis of deliveries using the Robson Classification System in a Brazilian hospital: a cross-sectional observational study.","authors":"Paulo Otavio Maluf Perin, Cassia Berbel, Maria Laura Costa, José Paulo de Siqueira Guida","doi":"10.1080/01443615.2025.2522867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The rising caesarean section rates are a global concern, highlighted by the World Health Organisation due to the adverse impacts associated with the overuse of this intervention. This study assessed the use of Robson Classification (RC) in a Brazilian university hospital from 2016 to 2020.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study was conducted from 2016 to 2020, including 9723 deliveries in a tertiary maternity hospital located in southeastern Brazil. Demographic, obstetric, and delivery data were considered to ascertain the RC. Caesarean section rates were calculated for each group and their absolute and relative contributions to the overall rate. Additionally, indications for induction and caesarean section were described.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall caesarean section rate was 38.9%, with a predominance of Group 5 (women with a previous caesarean section), which accounted for 37.1% of all caesarean sections. Group 1 (nulliparous women with spontaneous labour) had a caesarean section rate of 17%, while Group 10 (preterm pregnancies) showed a rate of 50.7%. The main indications for caesarean sections were foetal distress (24.5%), repeat caesarean section (16.8%), and dystocia (10.9%). Labour inductions occurred in 22% of cases, primarily due to post-term pregnancy (35.7%) and premature rupture of membranes (23.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The RC was an effective tool for monitoring and comparing obstetric practices, identifying the groups with the highest contributions to caesarean section rates. Specific strategies, such as protocols to encourage vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) and improvements in induction management, could help reduce unnecessary interventions. This study underscores the importance of implementing evidence-based guidelines to improve obstetric and neonatal outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16627,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"45 1","pages":"2522867"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2025.2522867","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The rising caesarean section rates are a global concern, highlighted by the World Health Organisation due to the adverse impacts associated with the overuse of this intervention. This study assessed the use of Robson Classification (RC) in a Brazilian university hospital from 2016 to 2020.
Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted from 2016 to 2020, including 9723 deliveries in a tertiary maternity hospital located in southeastern Brazil. Demographic, obstetric, and delivery data were considered to ascertain the RC. Caesarean section rates were calculated for each group and their absolute and relative contributions to the overall rate. Additionally, indications for induction and caesarean section were described.
Results: The overall caesarean section rate was 38.9%, with a predominance of Group 5 (women with a previous caesarean section), which accounted for 37.1% of all caesarean sections. Group 1 (nulliparous women with spontaneous labour) had a caesarean section rate of 17%, while Group 10 (preterm pregnancies) showed a rate of 50.7%. The main indications for caesarean sections were foetal distress (24.5%), repeat caesarean section (16.8%), and dystocia (10.9%). Labour inductions occurred in 22% of cases, primarily due to post-term pregnancy (35.7%) and premature rupture of membranes (23.4%).
Conclusions: The RC was an effective tool for monitoring and comparing obstetric practices, identifying the groups with the highest contributions to caesarean section rates. Specific strategies, such as protocols to encourage vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) and improvements in induction management, could help reduce unnecessary interventions. This study underscores the importance of implementing evidence-based guidelines to improve obstetric and neonatal outcomes.
期刊介绍：
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology represents an established forum for the entire field of obstetrics and gynaecology, publishing a broad range of original, peer-reviewed papers, from scientific and clinical research to reviews relevant to practice. It also includes occasional supplements on clinical symposia. The journal is read widely by trainees in our specialty and we acknowledge a major role in education in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Past and present editors have recognized the difficulties that junior doctors encounter in achieving their first publications and spend time advising authors during their initial attempts at submission. The journal continues to attract a world-wide readership thanks to the emphasis on practical applicability and its excellent record of drawing on an international base of authors.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
