Risk Factors for Unfavorable Angiographic Outcomes after Reconstructive Endovascular Treatments of Unruptured Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysms.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
KunHee Han, Jai Ho Choi, Woo Cheul Cho, Hyeong Jin Lee, Yong Sam Shin
{"title":"Risk Factors for Unfavorable Angiographic Outcomes after Reconstructive Endovascular Treatments of Unruptured Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysms.","authors":"KunHee Han, Jai Ho Choi, Woo Cheul Cho, Hyeong Jin Lee, Yong Sam Shin","doi":"10.3340/jkns.2025.0076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the clinical and radiological features of unruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms (uVADAs) treated with reconstructive endovascular techniques and to evaluate the risk factors associated with unfavorable radiological outcomes while focusing on the flow diversion effect.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 86 patients with uVADAs treated at a single tertiary center between January 2009 and December 2022. The patients were categorized into the flow diversion group (patients with uVADAs treated with a flow diverter or multiple stents) and the non-flow diversion group (patients with less than a single stent insertion). Unfavorable angiographic outcomes were defined as 1) recurrence after coil insertion regardless of stent deployment or 2) no regression after stent insertion without coil packing. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the related risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed 37 uVADAs in the flow diversion group. Recurrence or no regression occurred in 2 of 37 (9.1%) and 13 of 49 (27.7%) uVADAs in the flow and non-flow diversion groups, respectively. The treatment without flow diversion effect (non-flow diversion group; odds ratio [OR] = 8.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.23-52.57, p = 0.003) and hypertension (OR = 22.09, 95% CI = 2.51-194.2, p = 0.005) were significantly associated with unfavorable angiographic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The flow diversion effect using a flow diverter or multiple stents insertion, along with strict blood pressure control, may be an important factor in achieving favorable angiographic outcomes in uVADA treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16283,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2025.0076","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the clinical and radiological features of unruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms (uVADAs) treated with reconstructive endovascular techniques and to evaluate the risk factors associated with unfavorable radiological outcomes while focusing on the flow diversion effect.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 86 patients with uVADAs treated at a single tertiary center between January 2009 and December 2022. The patients were categorized into the flow diversion group (patients with uVADAs treated with a flow diverter or multiple stents) and the non-flow diversion group (patients with less than a single stent insertion). Unfavorable angiographic outcomes were defined as 1) recurrence after coil insertion regardless of stent deployment or 2) no regression after stent insertion without coil packing. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the related risk factors.

Results: We observed 37 uVADAs in the flow diversion group. Recurrence or no regression occurred in 2 of 37 (9.1%) and 13 of 49 (27.7%) uVADAs in the flow and non-flow diversion groups, respectively. The treatment without flow diversion effect (non-flow diversion group; odds ratio [OR] = 8.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.23-52.57, p = 0.003) and hypertension (OR = 22.09, 95% CI = 2.51-194.2, p = 0.005) were significantly associated with unfavorable angiographic outcomes.

Conclusion: The flow diversion effect using a flow diverter or multiple stents insertion, along with strict blood pressure control, may be an important factor in achieving favorable angiographic outcomes in uVADA treatment.

未破裂椎动脉夹层动脉瘤血管内重建治疗后不良血管造影结果的危险因素。
目的:探讨血管内重建技术治疗未破裂椎动脉夹层动脉瘤(uVADAs)的临床和影像学特点,并在重点关注血流分流效果的同时,评价其不良影像学预后的危险因素。方法:我们回顾性分析了2009年1月至2022年12月在单一三级中心治疗的86例uVADAs患者。患者被分为分流组(接受分流器或多个支架治疗的uVADAs患者)和非分流组(少于单个支架置入的患者)。不良的血管造影结果定义为:1)置入线圈后复发,无论支架部署与否;2)置入支架后未进行线圈填塞而无复发。进行单因素和多因素分析以评估相关危险因素。结果:分流组共观察到37个uVADAs。37例uVADAs中有2例(9.1%)复发或无复发,49例uVADAs中有13例(27.7%)无复发。无导流效果的处理(无导流组;优势比[OR] = 8.04, 95%可信区间[CI] = 1.23-52.57, p = 0.003)和高血压(OR = 22.09, 95% CI = 2.51-194.2, p = 0.005)与不良血管造影结果显著相关。结论:在uVADA治疗中,使用分流器或植入多个支架的分流效果以及严格的血压控制可能是获得良好血管造影结果的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
109
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society (J Korean Neurosurg Soc) is the official journal of the Korean Neurosurgical Society, and published bimonthly (1st day of January, March, May, July, September, and November). It launched in October 31, 1972 with Volume 1 and Number 1. J Korean Neurosurg Soc aims to allow neurosurgeons from around the world to enrich their knowledge of patient management, education, and clinical or experimental research, and hence their professionalism. This journal publishes Laboratory Investigations, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Case Reports, Technical Notes, and Letters to the Editor. Our field of interest involves clinical neurosurgery (cerebrovascular disease, neuro-oncology, skull base neurosurgery, spine, pediatric neurosurgery, functional neurosurgery, epilepsy, neuro-trauma, and peripheral nerve disease) and laboratory work in neuroscience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信