The Effects of Short-Term Heavy Load Squat vs. Moderate Load Olympic Weightlifting Training on Maximal Strength and Force-Velocity Profile in Young Female Handball Players.

IF 2.6 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Gergely Pálinkás, Csaba Ökrös, Zsófia Tróznai, Katinka Utczás, Leonidas Petridis
{"title":"The Effects of Short-Term Heavy Load Squat vs. Moderate Load Olympic Weightlifting Training on Maximal Strength and Force-Velocity Profile in Young Female Handball Players.","authors":"Gergely Pálinkás, Csaba Ökrös, Zsófia Tróznai, Katinka Utczás, Leonidas Petridis","doi":"10.3390/jfmk10020187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives</b>: This study examined changes in maximal strength and the force-velocity (FV) profile in young female handball players following an in-season heavy load squat or a moderate load Olympic weightlifting short-term training intervention. <b>Methods</b>: A total of 27 active young female handball players (age: 17.6 ± 0.98 years; height: 168.9 ± 5.1 cm; weight: 64.9 ± 10.6 kg) participated. 5RM back squats and unloaded and loaded countermovement jumps were assessed to establish the FV profile. Participants were divided into the following groups: the control group (CG; <i>n</i> = 8) followed its usual strength training including bodyweight exercises, the heavy load squat group (SQUAT; <i>n</i> = 7) performed heavy load back squats, and the Olympic weightlifting group (OWG; <i>n</i> = 12) used moderate load weightlifting derivates. <b>Results</b>: Absolute and relative 5RM back squat and vertical jump height increased in both intervention groups (5RM from 56.8 ± 5.5 to 62.2 ± 5.3 kg, <i>p</i> < 0.05 and CMJ height from 26.7 ± 4.7 to 28.4 ± 4.9 cm, <i>p</i> < 0.05 for SQUAT; 5RM from 56.6 ± 6.8 to 66.1 ± 6.9 kg, <i>p</i> < 0.05 and CMJ height from 26.9 ± 3.0 to 28.3 ± 3.2 cm, <i>p</i> < 0.05 for OWG), but not in the CG (5RM from 63.8 ± 12.5 to 63.4 ± 12.9 kg, CMJ height from 28.4 ± 2.2 to 27.7 ± 2.9 cm). The FV profile did not change significantly in either group. The theoretical maximal force remained almost unchanged in the SQUAT and OWG (+2% each), while only the OWG could slightly decrease FV imbalance (-14%). <b>Conclusions</b>: Both strength and Olympic weightlifting short-term training could improve strength and explosive performance, but without affecting the FV profile in young, less skilled female handball players. Olympic weightlifting may offer a slight advantage due to its potential to improve power production while optimizing FV imbalance.</p>","PeriodicalId":16052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12194710/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk10020187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study examined changes in maximal strength and the force-velocity (FV) profile in young female handball players following an in-season heavy load squat or a moderate load Olympic weightlifting short-term training intervention. Methods: A total of 27 active young female handball players (age: 17.6 ± 0.98 years; height: 168.9 ± 5.1 cm; weight: 64.9 ± 10.6 kg) participated. 5RM back squats and unloaded and loaded countermovement jumps were assessed to establish the FV profile. Participants were divided into the following groups: the control group (CG; n = 8) followed its usual strength training including bodyweight exercises, the heavy load squat group (SQUAT; n = 7) performed heavy load back squats, and the Olympic weightlifting group (OWG; n = 12) used moderate load weightlifting derivates. Results: Absolute and relative 5RM back squat and vertical jump height increased in both intervention groups (5RM from 56.8 ± 5.5 to 62.2 ± 5.3 kg, p < 0.05 and CMJ height from 26.7 ± 4.7 to 28.4 ± 4.9 cm, p < 0.05 for SQUAT; 5RM from 56.6 ± 6.8 to 66.1 ± 6.9 kg, p < 0.05 and CMJ height from 26.9 ± 3.0 to 28.3 ± 3.2 cm, p < 0.05 for OWG), but not in the CG (5RM from 63.8 ± 12.5 to 63.4 ± 12.9 kg, CMJ height from 28.4 ± 2.2 to 27.7 ± 2.9 cm). The FV profile did not change significantly in either group. The theoretical maximal force remained almost unchanged in the SQUAT and OWG (+2% each), while only the OWG could slightly decrease FV imbalance (-14%). Conclusions: Both strength and Olympic weightlifting short-term training could improve strength and explosive performance, but without affecting the FV profile in young, less skilled female handball players. Olympic weightlifting may offer a slight advantage due to its potential to improve power production while optimizing FV imbalance.

短期大负荷深蹲与中等负荷奥林匹克举重训练对年轻女子手球运动员最大力量和力-速度分布的影响。
目的:本研究考察了年轻女子手球运动员在进行赛季大负荷深蹲或中等负荷奥林匹克举重短期训练干预后最大力量和力-速度(FV)特征的变化。方法:选取现役年轻女子手球运动员27例(年龄:17.6±0.98岁;高度:168.9±5.1 cm;体重:64.9±10.6 kg)参加。评估5RM后蹲和卸载和加载反动作跳跃以建立FV剖面。参与者被分为以下组:对照组(CG);n = 8)遵循常规的力量训练,包括体重练习,大负荷深蹲组(深蹲;n = 7)进行大负荷后蹲,奥林匹克举重组(OWG;N = 12)采用中等负荷举重衍生物。结果:两个干预组的绝对和相对5RM后蹲和垂直跳高度均有所增加(5RM从56.8±5.5 kg增加到62.2±5.3 kg, p < 0.05;蹲组CMJ高度从26.7±4.7增加到28.4±4.9 cm, p < 0.05;5RM从56.6±6.8 kg降至66.1±6.9 kg, p < 0.05, CMJ身高从26.9±3.0降至28.3±3.2 cm, OWG组p < 0.05),但CG组没有(5RM从63.8±12.5降至63.4±12.9 kg, CMJ身高从28.4±2.2降至27.7±2.9 cm)。两组的FV谱均无显著变化。理论最大力量在深蹲和OWG中几乎保持不变(各+2%),而只有OWG可以略微降低FV不平衡(-14%)。结论:力量训练和奥林匹克举重短期训练均能提高年轻、技术较差的女子手球运动员的力量和爆发力,但对FV特征没有影响。奥运会举重可能提供一个轻微的优势,因为它的潜力,提高动力生产,同时优化FV不平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信