Reliability of Muscle Oxygen Saturation for Evaluating Exercise Intensity and Knee Joint Load Indicators.

IF 2.6 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Aldo A Vasquez-Bonilla, Rodrigo Yáñez-Sepúlveda, Matías Monsalves-Álvarez, Marcelo Tuesta, Daniel Duclos-Bastías, Guillermo Cortés-Roco, Jorge Olivares-Arancibia, Eduardo Guzmán-Muñoz, José Francisco López-Gil
{"title":"Reliability of Muscle Oxygen Saturation for Evaluating Exercise Intensity and Knee Joint Load Indicators.","authors":"Aldo A Vasquez-Bonilla, Rodrigo Yáñez-Sepúlveda, Matías Monsalves-Álvarez, Marcelo Tuesta, Daniel Duclos-Bastías, Guillermo Cortés-Roco, Jorge Olivares-Arancibia, Eduardo Guzmán-Muñoz, José Francisco López-Gil","doi":"10.3390/jfmk10020136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of muscle oxygen saturation (SmO<sub>2</sub>) and its correlation with variables from an inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensor placed on the knee at different exercise intensities. <b>Methods:</b> Fourteen university athletes participated in the study. Incremental ergospirometry was performed to exhaustion to calculate V'O<sub>2</sub>max, determine training zones, heart rate, and workload using the IMU, and analyze muscle metabolism by SmO<sub>2</sub>. <b>Results:</b> The analysis revealed significant differences between moderate-to-high-intensity zones (80-89% vs. 50-69%, Δ = 27% of SmO<sub>2</sub>; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and high-intensity zones (90-100% vs. 50-79%, Δ = 35% of SmO<sub>2</sub>; <i>p</i> < 0.001). SmO<sub>2</sub> values showed moderate reliability at moderate exercise intensities (e.g., ICC 0.744 at 50%) and high variability at higher intensities, with ICC values around 0.577-0.594, and CV% increasing up to 77.7% at 100% intensity, indicating decreasing consistency as exercise intensity increases. SmO<sub>2</sub> significantly decreases with increasing angular velocity (β = -13.9, <i>p</i> < 0.001), while knee joint load only shows significant correlations with SmO<sub>2</sub> in the moderate-to-high-intensity zones (r = 0.569, <i>p</i> = 0.004) and high-intensity zones (r = 0.455, <i>p</i> = 0.012). <b>Conclusions:</b> SmO<sub>2</sub> is a key predictor of performance during maximal incremental exercise, particularly in high-intensity zones. Moreover, SmO<sub>2</sub> has the potential to serve as a physiological marker of the internal load on the muscles surrounding the knee during exercise. The SmO<sub>2</sub> decrease could depend on the angular velocity and impact of the exposed knee during running.</p>","PeriodicalId":16052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12015839/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk10020136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of muscle oxygen saturation (SmO2) and its correlation with variables from an inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensor placed on the knee at different exercise intensities. Methods: Fourteen university athletes participated in the study. Incremental ergospirometry was performed to exhaustion to calculate V'O2max, determine training zones, heart rate, and workload using the IMU, and analyze muscle metabolism by SmO2. Results: The analysis revealed significant differences between moderate-to-high-intensity zones (80-89% vs. 50-69%, Δ = 27% of SmO2; p < 0.001) and high-intensity zones (90-100% vs. 50-79%, Δ = 35% of SmO2; p < 0.001). SmO2 values showed moderate reliability at moderate exercise intensities (e.g., ICC 0.744 at 50%) and high variability at higher intensities, with ICC values around 0.577-0.594, and CV% increasing up to 77.7% at 100% intensity, indicating decreasing consistency as exercise intensity increases. SmO2 significantly decreases with increasing angular velocity (β = -13.9, p < 0.001), while knee joint load only shows significant correlations with SmO2 in the moderate-to-high-intensity zones (r = 0.569, p = 0.004) and high-intensity zones (r = 0.455, p = 0.012). Conclusions: SmO2 is a key predictor of performance during maximal incremental exercise, particularly in high-intensity zones. Moreover, SmO2 has the potential to serve as a physiological marker of the internal load on the muscles surrounding the knee during exercise. The SmO2 decrease could depend on the angular velocity and impact of the exposed knee during running.

肌肉氧饱和度评估运动强度和膝关节负荷指标的可靠性。
目的:本研究旨在评估不同运动强度下放置在膝关节上的惯性测量单元(IMU)传感器的肌肉氧饱和度(SmO2)的可靠性及其与变量的相关性。方法:选取14名大学生运动员为研究对象。累进式肺活量测定法计算疲劳度,使用IMU确定训练区域、心率和工作量,并通过SmO2分析肌肉代谢。结果:分析显示中、高强度区(80-89% vs 50-69%, Δ = 27%的SmO2;p < 0.001)和高强度区(90-100% vs. 50-79%, Δ = 35%的SmO2;P < 0.001)。SmO2值在中等运动强度下表现出中等的可靠性(例如,50%时ICC为0.744),在高强度下表现出高变异性,ICC值在0.577-0.594之间,CV%在100%强度时增加到77.7%,表明随着运动强度的增加,一致性降低。随着角速度的增加,SmO2显著降低(β = -13.9, p < 0.001),而膝关节负荷与SmO2仅在中高强度区(r = 0.569, p = 0.004)和高强度区(r = 0.455, p = 0.012)呈显著相关。结论:SmO2是最大增量运动中表现的关键预测因子,特别是在高强度区域。此外,SmO2有可能作为运动期间膝盖周围肌肉内部负荷的生理标志。SmO2的减少可能取决于角速度和跑步时暴露膝盖的冲击。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信