Psychometric Characteristics of Smartphone-Based Gait Analyses in Chronic Health Conditions: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.6 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Tobias Bea, Helmi Chaabene, Constantin Wilhelm Freitag, Lutz Schega
{"title":"Psychometric Characteristics of Smartphone-Based Gait Analyses in Chronic Health Conditions: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Tobias Bea, Helmi Chaabene, Constantin Wilhelm Freitag, Lutz Schega","doi":"10.3390/jfmk10020133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Chronic health conditions frequently result in gait disturbances, impacting quality of life and mobility. Smartphone-based gait analysis has emerged as a promising alternative to traditional methods, offering accessibility, cost effectiveness, and portability. This systematic review evaluates smartphone-based inertial measurement units' validity, reliability, and sensitivity for assessing gait parameters in individuals with chronic conditions. <b>Methods:</b> A comprehensive literature search in Web of Science, PubMed, Google Scholar, and SportDiscus identified 54 eligible studies. <b>Results:</b> Validity was evaluated in 70% of the included studies, with results showing moderate-to-strong associations between smartphone apps and gold-standard systems (e.g., Vicon), particularly for parameters such as gait speed and stride length (e.g., r = 0.42-0.97). However, variability was evident across studies depending on the health condition, measurement protocols, and device placement. Reliability, examined in only 27% of the included studies, displayed a similar trend, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ranging from moderate (ICC = 0.53) to excellent (ICC = 0.95) for spatiotemporal parameters. Sensitivity and specificity metrics were explored in 41% and 35% of the included studies, respectively, with several applications achieving over 90% accuracy in detecting gait abnormalities. Feasibility was rated positively in 94% of the included studies, emphasising the practical advantages of smartphones in diverse settings. <b>Conclusions:</b> The findings of this systematic review endorse the clinical potential of smartphones for remote and real-world gait analysis, while highlighting the need for standardised methodologies. Future research should adopt a more comprehensive approach to psychometric evaluation, ensuring that reliability aspects are adequately explored. Additionally, long-term studies are needed to assess the effectiveness of smartphone-based technologies in supporting the personalised treatment and proactive management of chronic conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12015829/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk10020133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic health conditions frequently result in gait disturbances, impacting quality of life and mobility. Smartphone-based gait analysis has emerged as a promising alternative to traditional methods, offering accessibility, cost effectiveness, and portability. This systematic review evaluates smartphone-based inertial measurement units' validity, reliability, and sensitivity for assessing gait parameters in individuals with chronic conditions. Methods: A comprehensive literature search in Web of Science, PubMed, Google Scholar, and SportDiscus identified 54 eligible studies. Results: Validity was evaluated in 70% of the included studies, with results showing moderate-to-strong associations between smartphone apps and gold-standard systems (e.g., Vicon), particularly for parameters such as gait speed and stride length (e.g., r = 0.42-0.97). However, variability was evident across studies depending on the health condition, measurement protocols, and device placement. Reliability, examined in only 27% of the included studies, displayed a similar trend, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ranging from moderate (ICC = 0.53) to excellent (ICC = 0.95) for spatiotemporal parameters. Sensitivity and specificity metrics were explored in 41% and 35% of the included studies, respectively, with several applications achieving over 90% accuracy in detecting gait abnormalities. Feasibility was rated positively in 94% of the included studies, emphasising the practical advantages of smartphones in diverse settings. Conclusions: The findings of this systematic review endorse the clinical potential of smartphones for remote and real-world gait analysis, while highlighting the need for standardised methodologies. Future research should adopt a more comprehensive approach to psychometric evaluation, ensuring that reliability aspects are adequately explored. Additionally, long-term studies are needed to assess the effectiveness of smartphone-based technologies in supporting the personalised treatment and proactive management of chronic conditions.

基于智能手机的慢性健康状况步态分析的心理测量特征:系统综述。
背景:慢性健康状况经常导致步态障碍,影响生活质量和活动能力。基于智能手机的步态分析已经成为传统方法的一种有前途的替代方法,具有可访问性、成本效益和便携性。本系统综述评估了基于智能手机的惯性测量单元在评估慢性疾病患者步态参数方面的有效性、可靠性和敏感性。方法:在Web of Science, PubMed, b谷歌Scholar和SportDiscus中进行综合文献检索,确定了54项符合条件的研究。结果:70%的纳入研究对有效性进行了评估,结果显示智能手机应用程序与金标准系统(例如Vicon)之间存在中等到强烈的关联,特别是在步速和步长等参数方面(例如,r = 0.42-0.97)。然而,根据健康状况、测量方案和设备放置的不同,研究之间的差异很明显。在纳入的研究中,只有27%的研究检测了可靠性,显示出类似的趋势,类内相关系数(ICC)在时空参数上从中等(ICC = 0.53)到优异(ICC = 0.95)不等。在纳入的研究中,分别有41%和35%的研究探讨了灵敏度和特异性指标,其中一些应用在检测步态异常方面的准确率超过90%。在纳入的研究中,94%的可行性评价是积极的,强调了智能手机在不同环境中的实际优势。结论:本系统综述的研究结果支持智能手机在远程和现实世界步态分析方面的临床潜力,同时强调了标准化方法的必要性。未来的研究应采用更全面的方法来进行心理测量评估,确保对信度方面进行充分的探索。此外,需要长期研究来评估基于智能手机的技术在支持个性化治疗和慢性病主动管理方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信