Effects of a 5-Day Back Squat Overreaching Protocol on Strength Performance, Perceived Recovery and Wellness Responses: A Pilot Trial.

IF 2.6 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Lee Bell, Alan Ruddock, Jordan Boriel, Tom Maden-Wilkinson, Steve W Thompson, Kieran J Wright, Kieran Burke, David Rogerson
{"title":"Effects of a 5-Day Back Squat Overreaching Protocol on Strength Performance, Perceived Recovery and Wellness Responses: A Pilot Trial.","authors":"Lee Bell, Alan Ruddock, Jordan Boriel, Tom Maden-Wilkinson, Steve W Thompson, Kieran J Wright, Kieran Burke, David Rogerson","doi":"10.3390/jfmk10020227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to characterise the performance, perceptual, and wellness responses to a barbell back squat overreaching training protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight trained male participants (age = 24.6 ± 2.8 years; relative to body mass back squat one repetition maximum (1-RM) = 1.9 ± 0.4; training experience = 7.0 ± 3.2 years) participated in a 5-day squat OR protocol (SqOR), followed by a 14-day taper. SqOR consisted of five sets of barbell back squats using 80% of daily adjusted 1-RM. A 40% velocity loss threshold was used to determine the set end point. For performance, isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP) peak force (PF), and countermovement jump (CMJ) PF and jump height; for perceptual, perceived recovery scale (PRS); and for wellness, Hooper Wellness Index (HWI), were recorded at baseline, each day of SqOR, and at select intervals during the taper (POST 1 d, 2 d, 7 d, and 14 d). Follow-up back squat 1-RM testing was conducted at POST 7 d and POST 14 d to determine strength-performance changes relative to baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Back squat 1-RM increased by 4.8% at POST 7 d and 5.2% at POST 14 d. IMTP PF increased by 10.3% at POST 7 d and 11.4% at POST 14 d relative to the baseline. CMJ PF and jump height decreased during SqOR but returned to baseline by POST 7 d. PRS and HWI worsened during SqOR, with the greatest impairment occurring on day 3 (PRS = -41.5%; HWI = 34.4%), and did not return to baseline until POST 14 d and POST 2 d, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings demonstrate that a short-term period of planned OR improves muscular strength performance, but the duration of the taper influences when peak strength improvements are observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":16052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12193981/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk10020227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to characterise the performance, perceptual, and wellness responses to a barbell back squat overreaching training protocol.

Methods: Eight trained male participants (age = 24.6 ± 2.8 years; relative to body mass back squat one repetition maximum (1-RM) = 1.9 ± 0.4; training experience = 7.0 ± 3.2 years) participated in a 5-day squat OR protocol (SqOR), followed by a 14-day taper. SqOR consisted of five sets of barbell back squats using 80% of daily adjusted 1-RM. A 40% velocity loss threshold was used to determine the set end point. For performance, isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP) peak force (PF), and countermovement jump (CMJ) PF and jump height; for perceptual, perceived recovery scale (PRS); and for wellness, Hooper Wellness Index (HWI), were recorded at baseline, each day of SqOR, and at select intervals during the taper (POST 1 d, 2 d, 7 d, and 14 d). Follow-up back squat 1-RM testing was conducted at POST 7 d and POST 14 d to determine strength-performance changes relative to baseline.

Results: Back squat 1-RM increased by 4.8% at POST 7 d and 5.2% at POST 14 d. IMTP PF increased by 10.3% at POST 7 d and 11.4% at POST 14 d relative to the baseline. CMJ PF and jump height decreased during SqOR but returned to baseline by POST 7 d. PRS and HWI worsened during SqOR, with the greatest impairment occurring on day 3 (PRS = -41.5%; HWI = 34.4%), and did not return to baseline until POST 14 d and POST 2 d, respectively.

Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that a short-term period of planned OR improves muscular strength performance, but the duration of the taper influences when peak strength improvements are observed.

5天后蹲过伸方案对力量表现、感知恢复和健康反应的影响:一项试点试验。
背景:本研究的目的是描述杠铃后蹲过伸训练方案的表现、知觉和健康反应。方法:8名男性受试者(年龄= 24.6±2.8岁;相对于体重,单次蹲起最大重复量(1-RM) = 1.9±0.4;训练经验= 7.0±3.2年)参加5天深蹲或方案(SqOR),随后14天逐渐减少。SqOR包括五组杠铃后蹲,使用80%的每日调整1-RM。采用40%的速度损失阈值来确定设定的终点。对于性能,等距大腿中部牵拉(IMTP)峰值力(PF)和反动作跳跃(CMJ) PF和跳跃高度;知觉方面为知觉恢复量表(PRS);在健康方面,在基线、SqOR的每一天以及逐渐减少期间的选择间隔(后1天、2天、7天和14天)记录Hooper健康指数(HWI)。在POST 7 d和POST 14 d进行随访后蹲1-RM测试,以确定相对于基线的力量表现变化。结果:与基线相比,后蹲1-RM在7天后增加4.8%,在14天后增加5.2%。IMTP PF在7天后增加10.3%,在14天后增加11.4%。CMJ PF和跳跃高度在SqOR期间下降,但在7 d后恢复到基线水平。PRS和HWI在SqOR期间恶化,第3天出现最大损害(PRS = -41.5%;HWI = 34.4%),分别在14 d和2 d后才恢复到基线。结论:这些研究结果表明,短期的计划手术可以改善肌肉力量表现,但当观察到峰值力量改善时,逐渐减少的持续时间会受到影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信