Yunilas Yunilas, Uswatun Hasanah, Trioso Purnawarman, Muheri Indra Aja Nasution
{"title":"The ability of chitosan-stearin as an edible coating on the quality of broiler chicken meat during cold storage.","authors":"Yunilas Yunilas, Uswatun Hasanah, Trioso Purnawarman, Muheri Indra Aja Nasution","doi":"10.5455/javar.2025.l876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate how well fresh broiler meat may be preserved in cold storage using chitosan-stearin as an edible coating.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A completely randomized design with a 3 x 5 factorial arrangement and three replications was employed. Factor I represented the formula dosage (FD) (FD0 = 0% chitosan + 0% stearin; FD1 = 1.5% chitosan + 1% stearin; FD2 = 3% chitosan + 1% stearin), while Factor II represented storage time (ST) (ST0 = 0 days; ST1 = 3 days; ST2 = 6 days; ST3 = 9 days; ST4 = 12 days).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that the water content, cooking loss, protein content, and fat content of broiler meat were significantly affected (<i>p</i> < 0.01) by the FD and ST. Nonetheless, no significant difference (p > 0.05) was observed in the meat's ability to hold water. The broiler meat's pH was significantly affected (<i>p</i> < 0.01) by the FD, but it was not significantly affected (<i>p</i> > 0.05) by the ST. Furthermore, no treatment underwent testing, which revealed the presence of <i>Escherichia coli</i> and <i>Salmonella</i> sp.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Chitosan-stearin edible coatings with different formula doses FD and ST consistently preserve the quality of fresh broiler meat during cold storage, with average values of water content ranging from 48.97% to 53.73%, water-holding capacity from 17.52% to 34.30%, cooking loss from 10.03% to 33.19%, pH levels from 4.93 to 5.53, protein content from 14.54% to 17.46%, fat content from 20.55% to 24.21%, and no detectable presence of <i>E. coli</i> and <i>Salmonella</i> sp.</p>","PeriodicalId":14892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"99-105"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12186788/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2025.l876","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate how well fresh broiler meat may be preserved in cold storage using chitosan-stearin as an edible coating.
Materials and methods: A completely randomized design with a 3 x 5 factorial arrangement and three replications was employed. Factor I represented the formula dosage (FD) (FD0 = 0% chitosan + 0% stearin; FD1 = 1.5% chitosan + 1% stearin; FD2 = 3% chitosan + 1% stearin), while Factor II represented storage time (ST) (ST0 = 0 days; ST1 = 3 days; ST2 = 6 days; ST3 = 9 days; ST4 = 12 days).
Results: The results showed that the water content, cooking loss, protein content, and fat content of broiler meat were significantly affected (p < 0.01) by the FD and ST. Nonetheless, no significant difference (p > 0.05) was observed in the meat's ability to hold water. The broiler meat's pH was significantly affected (p < 0.01) by the FD, but it was not significantly affected (p > 0.05) by the ST. Furthermore, no treatment underwent testing, which revealed the presence of Escherichia coli and Salmonella sp.
Conclusion: Chitosan-stearin edible coatings with different formula doses FD and ST consistently preserve the quality of fresh broiler meat during cold storage, with average values of water content ranging from 48.97% to 53.73%, water-holding capacity from 17.52% to 34.30%, cooking loss from 10.03% to 33.19%, pH levels from 4.93 to 5.53, protein content from 14.54% to 17.46%, fat content from 20.55% to 24.21%, and no detectable presence of E. coli and Salmonella sp.