{"title":"Diagnostic and prognostic multimodal prediction models in Alzheimer's disease: A scoping review.","authors":"Xin Xia, Lukas A Duffner, Christophe Bintener, Angela Bradshaw, Daphné Lamirel, Linus Jönsson","doi":"10.1177/13872877251351630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundMultimodal prediction models for Alzheimer's disease (AD) are emerging as promising tools for improving detection and informing prognosis.ObjectiveTo summarize the predictive objectives, constituting predictors and algorithms, and performance of existing multimodal prediction models.MethodsWe performed a systematic literature search in Medline, Embase, and Web of Science up to January 15, 2024, to identify prediction models covering the full spectrum of AD, from the preclinical stage to subjective cognitive decline (SCD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and AD dementia. The predictors, algorithms, and model performance of prediction models were summarized narratively by their predictive objectives. The review protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework (osf.io/zkw6g).ResultsPredicting the future progression from MCI to AD dementia was the most common objective of prediction models for AD. The second most common objective was to classify AD stages (SCD versus MCI versus AD dementia), followed by detecting the presence of amyloid, tau, or neurodegeneration. More than half of the prediction models reported an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve exceeding 0.8 and an accuracy exceeding 70%. However, 66.7% of the prediction models were developed using data from the ADNI study, and only 10.1% of the models went through external validation.ConclusionsExisting multimodal prediction models have mainly focused on the prediction of current or future AD stages and reported good performance. However, these models need to be validated using data other than the data used for model training before being considered for practical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"13872877251351630"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251351630","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundMultimodal prediction models for Alzheimer's disease (AD) are emerging as promising tools for improving detection and informing prognosis.ObjectiveTo summarize the predictive objectives, constituting predictors and algorithms, and performance of existing multimodal prediction models.MethodsWe performed a systematic literature search in Medline, Embase, and Web of Science up to January 15, 2024, to identify prediction models covering the full spectrum of AD, from the preclinical stage to subjective cognitive decline (SCD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and AD dementia. The predictors, algorithms, and model performance of prediction models were summarized narratively by their predictive objectives. The review protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework (osf.io/zkw6g).ResultsPredicting the future progression from MCI to AD dementia was the most common objective of prediction models for AD. The second most common objective was to classify AD stages (SCD versus MCI versus AD dementia), followed by detecting the presence of amyloid, tau, or neurodegeneration. More than half of the prediction models reported an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve exceeding 0.8 and an accuracy exceeding 70%. However, 66.7% of the prediction models were developed using data from the ADNI study, and only 10.1% of the models went through external validation.ConclusionsExisting multimodal prediction models have mainly focused on the prediction of current or future AD stages and reported good performance. However, these models need to be validated using data other than the data used for model training before being considered for practical applications.
阿尔茨海默病(AD)的多模态预测模型正在成为改善检测和告知预后的有前途的工具。目的总结现有多模态预测模型的预测目标、预测因子的构成、算法及性能。方法系统检索截至2024年1月15日的Medline、Embase和Web of Science的文献,以确定涵盖阿尔茨海默病全谱的预测模型,从临床前阶段到主观认知能力下降(SCD)、轻度认知障碍(MCI)和阿尔茨海默病痴呆。根据预测目标,对预测模型的预测因子、算法和模型性能进行了概述。审查方案已在开放科学框架(osf.io/zkw6g)上注册。结果预测从轻度认知损伤到AD痴呆的未来进展是AD预测模型最常见的目标。第二个最常见的目标是对AD分期进行分类(SCD、MCI、AD痴呆),然后检测淀粉样蛋白、tau蛋白或神经变性的存在。超过一半的预测模型报告了接收者工作特征曲线下的面积超过0.8,精度超过70%。然而,66.7%的预测模型是利用ADNI研究的数据建立的,只有10.1%的模型经过了外部验证。结论现有的多模态预测模型主要集中在对当前或未来AD阶段的预测上,且具有较好的预测效果。然而,在考虑实际应用之前,这些模型需要使用用于模型训练的数据以外的数据进行验证。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.