Diagnostic and prognostic multimodal prediction models in Alzheimer's disease: A scoping review.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Xin Xia, Lukas A Duffner, Christophe Bintener, Angela Bradshaw, Daphné Lamirel, Linus Jönsson
{"title":"Diagnostic and prognostic multimodal prediction models in Alzheimer's disease: A scoping review.","authors":"Xin Xia, Lukas A Duffner, Christophe Bintener, Angela Bradshaw, Daphné Lamirel, Linus Jönsson","doi":"10.1177/13872877251351630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundMultimodal prediction models for Alzheimer's disease (AD) are emerging as promising tools for improving detection and informing prognosis.ObjectiveTo summarize the predictive objectives, constituting predictors and algorithms, and performance of existing multimodal prediction models.MethodsWe performed a systematic literature search in Medline, Embase, and Web of Science up to January 15, 2024, to identify prediction models covering the full spectrum of AD, from the preclinical stage to subjective cognitive decline (SCD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and AD dementia. The predictors, algorithms, and model performance of prediction models were summarized narratively by their predictive objectives. The review protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework (osf.io/zkw6g).ResultsPredicting the future progression from MCI to AD dementia was the most common objective of prediction models for AD. The second most common objective was to classify AD stages (SCD versus MCI versus AD dementia), followed by detecting the presence of amyloid, tau, or neurodegeneration. More than half of the prediction models reported an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve exceeding 0.8 and an accuracy exceeding 70%. However, 66.7% of the prediction models were developed using data from the ADNI study, and only 10.1% of the models went through external validation.ConclusionsExisting multimodal prediction models have mainly focused on the prediction of current or future AD stages and reported good performance. However, these models need to be validated using data other than the data used for model training before being considered for practical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"13872877251351630"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251351630","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundMultimodal prediction models for Alzheimer's disease (AD) are emerging as promising tools for improving detection and informing prognosis.ObjectiveTo summarize the predictive objectives, constituting predictors and algorithms, and performance of existing multimodal prediction models.MethodsWe performed a systematic literature search in Medline, Embase, and Web of Science up to January 15, 2024, to identify prediction models covering the full spectrum of AD, from the preclinical stage to subjective cognitive decline (SCD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and AD dementia. The predictors, algorithms, and model performance of prediction models were summarized narratively by their predictive objectives. The review protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework (osf.io/zkw6g).ResultsPredicting the future progression from MCI to AD dementia was the most common objective of prediction models for AD. The second most common objective was to classify AD stages (SCD versus MCI versus AD dementia), followed by detecting the presence of amyloid, tau, or neurodegeneration. More than half of the prediction models reported an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve exceeding 0.8 and an accuracy exceeding 70%. However, 66.7% of the prediction models were developed using data from the ADNI study, and only 10.1% of the models went through external validation.ConclusionsExisting multimodal prediction models have mainly focused on the prediction of current or future AD stages and reported good performance. However, these models need to be validated using data other than the data used for model training before being considered for practical applications.

阿尔茨海默病的诊断和预后多模态预测模型:范围综述。
阿尔茨海默病(AD)的多模态预测模型正在成为改善检测和告知预后的有前途的工具。目的总结现有多模态预测模型的预测目标、预测因子的构成、算法及性能。方法系统检索截至2024年1月15日的Medline、Embase和Web of Science的文献,以确定涵盖阿尔茨海默病全谱的预测模型,从临床前阶段到主观认知能力下降(SCD)、轻度认知障碍(MCI)和阿尔茨海默病痴呆。根据预测目标,对预测模型的预测因子、算法和模型性能进行了概述。审查方案已在开放科学框架(osf.io/zkw6g)上注册。结果预测从轻度认知损伤到AD痴呆的未来进展是AD预测模型最常见的目标。第二个最常见的目标是对AD分期进行分类(SCD、MCI、AD痴呆),然后检测淀粉样蛋白、tau蛋白或神经变性的存在。超过一半的预测模型报告了接收者工作特征曲线下的面积超过0.8,精度超过70%。然而,66.7%的预测模型是利用ADNI研究的数据建立的,只有10.1%的模型经过了外部验证。结论现有的多模态预测模型主要集中在对当前或未来AD阶段的预测上,且具有较好的预测效果。然而,在考虑实际应用之前,这些模型需要使用用于模型训练的数据以外的数据进行验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信