Further evidence of depressive symptomatology profile predicting treatment outcome.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Maria Luca, Antonina Luca, Alessandro Serretti
{"title":"Further evidence of depressive symptomatology profile predicting treatment outcome.","authors":"Maria Luca, Antonina Luca, Alessandro Serretti","doi":"10.1080/13651501.2025.2519530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-response to treatment is a major problem in Major Depressive Disorder. The identification of predictors of poor outcome could improve treatment strategies. Overall baseline severity is one of the strongest predictors, but the specific symptoms profile is poorly investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Baseline symptoms scores of 1533 depressed patients were assessed through the 30-item Inventory for Depressive Symptomatology, Clinician-rated (IDS-C<sub>30</sub>), as part of the Sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression (STAR*D) trial. Treatment outcomes were assessed after treatment with citalopram. We tested IDS-C<sub>30</sub> individual items associated with non-response in the whole sample and sex-stratified subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sadness, sleep disturbances and lassitude were predictors of outcome in the whole sample. Females showed higher scores at many somatic domains (i.e., aches and pain), the latter relating to poor outcome. Anhedonic features, albeit with sex-specific differences, were associated with poor outcome across all study groups, along with depression severity and suicidal thoughts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings further refine the observation that specific baseline symptomatology profiles are related to poor response in depressed individuals. This finding may inform at a clinical level for personalised treatment. The sex-specific differences suggest a thorough assessment of depressive features at the very first approach with the depressed patient.</p><p><strong>Keypoints: </strong>Sadness, sleep disturbances and reduced energy are strong predictors of poor outcome in depressed individualsSomatic complaints may be stronger predictors among females compared to malesAnhedonic features relate to non-response.</p>","PeriodicalId":14351,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":"144-151"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13651501.2025.2519530","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Non-response to treatment is a major problem in Major Depressive Disorder. The identification of predictors of poor outcome could improve treatment strategies. Overall baseline severity is one of the strongest predictors, but the specific symptoms profile is poorly investigated.

Methods: Baseline symptoms scores of 1533 depressed patients were assessed through the 30-item Inventory for Depressive Symptomatology, Clinician-rated (IDS-C30), as part of the Sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression (STAR*D) trial. Treatment outcomes were assessed after treatment with citalopram. We tested IDS-C30 individual items associated with non-response in the whole sample and sex-stratified subgroups.

Results: Sadness, sleep disturbances and lassitude were predictors of outcome in the whole sample. Females showed higher scores at many somatic domains (i.e., aches and pain), the latter relating to poor outcome. Anhedonic features, albeit with sex-specific differences, were associated with poor outcome across all study groups, along with depression severity and suicidal thoughts.

Conclusions: Our findings further refine the observation that specific baseline symptomatology profiles are related to poor response in depressed individuals. This finding may inform at a clinical level for personalised treatment. The sex-specific differences suggest a thorough assessment of depressive features at the very first approach with the depressed patient.

Keypoints: Sadness, sleep disturbances and reduced energy are strong predictors of poor outcome in depressed individualsSomatic complaints may be stronger predictors among females compared to malesAnhedonic features relate to non-response.

抑郁症症状分析预测治疗结果的进一步证据。
背景:治疗无效是重度抑郁症的一个主要问题。确定不良预后的预测因素可以改善治疗策略。总体基线严重程度是最强的预测因素之一,但具体的症状概况调查甚少。方法:通过30项临床抑郁症状量表(IDS-C30)评估1533名抑郁症患者的基线症状评分,作为缓解抑郁的测序治疗方案(STAR*D)试验的一部分。用西酞普兰治疗后评估治疗结果。我们在整个样本和按性别分层的亚组中测试了与无反应相关的IDS-C30个体项目。结果:悲伤、睡眠障碍和倦怠是整个样本预后的预测因子。女性在许多身体领域(如疼痛)表现出更高的分数,后者与糟糕的结果有关。尽管存在性别差异,但在所有的研究小组中,快乐缺乏特征与不良结果、抑郁严重程度和自杀念头有关。结论:我们的研究结果进一步完善了特定基线症状谱与抑郁症患者不良反应相关的观察结果。这一发现可能在临床层面为个性化治疗提供信息。性别特异性差异表明,在与抑郁症患者的第一次接触时,需要对抑郁症特征进行彻底的评估。重点:悲伤、睡眠障碍和精力不足是抑郁症患者预后不良的有力预测因素。与男性相比,女性的躯体抱怨可能是更强的预测因素。快感缺乏特征与无反应有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice provides an international forum for communication among health professionals with clinical, academic and research interests in psychiatry. The journal gives particular emphasis to papers that integrate the findings of academic research into realities of clinical practice. Focus on the practical aspects of managing and treating patients. Essential reading for the busy psychiatrist, trainee and interested physician. Includes original research papers, comprehensive review articles and short communications. Key words: Psychiatry, Neuropsychopharmacology, Mental health, Neuropsychiatry, Clinical Neurophysiology, Psychophysiology, Psychotherapy, Addiction, Schizophrenia, Depression, Bipolar Disorders and Anxiety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信