Healthcare Providers' Perceptions of Vulnerability to Domestic Sex Trafficking in Ontario: A Qualitative Study.

IF 2.5 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Health Services Insights Pub Date : 2025-06-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11786329251348295
Corinne Rogers, Soumyaa Veerakumar Subramanium, Rhonelle Bruder, Robin Mason, Janice Du Mont
{"title":"Healthcare Providers' Perceptions of Vulnerability to Domestic Sex Trafficking in Ontario: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Corinne Rogers, Soumyaa Veerakumar Subramanium, Rhonelle Bruder, Robin Mason, Janice Du Mont","doi":"10.1177/11786329251348295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Domestic sex trafficking is a prevalent health and human rights issue in Ontario, Canada. Although providers working in healthcare settings are uniquely positioned to identify and care for individuals who are sex trafficked, they may be hampered by a limited understanding of who is vulnerable to being sex trafficked and, thereby, fail to recognize those in need of support.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This qualitative study, part of a larger program of research, sought to apply critical social theory, and intersectionality to explore providers' perceptions of who is vulnerable to domestic sex trafficking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-one healthcare providers of diverse identities and professional backgrounds were interviewed, using open-ended semi-structured questions, between November 2022 and February 2023. The interviews were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis framework and organized by a modified Taxonomy of Vulnerability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three themes were generated: Traumatic history, social identities and relationships, and structural determinants. Providers consistently identified being female as a vulnerability to domestic sex trafficking. Few providers referenced the intersections of being female with other sociodemographic characteristics or acknowledged the complex ways in which larger systems have perpetuated the marginalization and inequitable status of some persons.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings emphasize the urgent need to understand vulnerability as more than just an individual condition. Further, provider training must cultivate critical consciousness to recognize the contextual roots of vulnerability and how the role and socialization processes of larger systems in perpetuating vulnerabilities differently across individuals' lives.</p>","PeriodicalId":12876,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Insights","volume":"18 ","pages":"11786329251348295"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188056/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329251348295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Domestic sex trafficking is a prevalent health and human rights issue in Ontario, Canada. Although providers working in healthcare settings are uniquely positioned to identify and care for individuals who are sex trafficked, they may be hampered by a limited understanding of who is vulnerable to being sex trafficked and, thereby, fail to recognize those in need of support.

Objectives: This qualitative study, part of a larger program of research, sought to apply critical social theory, and intersectionality to explore providers' perceptions of who is vulnerable to domestic sex trafficking.

Methods: Thirty-one healthcare providers of diverse identities and professional backgrounds were interviewed, using open-ended semi-structured questions, between November 2022 and February 2023. The interviews were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis framework and organized by a modified Taxonomy of Vulnerability.

Results: Three themes were generated: Traumatic history, social identities and relationships, and structural determinants. Providers consistently identified being female as a vulnerability to domestic sex trafficking. Few providers referenced the intersections of being female with other sociodemographic characteristics or acknowledged the complex ways in which larger systems have perpetuated the marginalization and inequitable status of some persons.

Conclusion: The findings emphasize the urgent need to understand vulnerability as more than just an individual condition. Further, provider training must cultivate critical consciousness to recognize the contextual roots of vulnerability and how the role and socialization processes of larger systems in perpetuating vulnerabilities differently across individuals' lives.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

安大略省医疗服务提供者对家庭性交易脆弱性的看法:一项定性研究。
背景:国内性贩运是加拿大安大略省一个普遍存在的健康和人权问题。虽然在卫生保健机构工作的提供者在识别和照顾被性贩运的个人方面处于独特的地位,但他们可能由于对哪些人容易被性贩运的了解有限而受到阻碍,从而无法识别需要支持的人。目的:这个定性研究是一个更大的研究项目的一部分,试图应用批判性社会理论和交叉性来探索提供者对谁容易受到国内性贩运的看法。方法:在2022年11月至2023年2月期间,采用开放式半结构化问题对31名不同身份和专业背景的医疗保健提供者进行了访谈。访谈采用Braun和Clarke的反思性主题分析框架进行分析,并采用修改后的脆弱性分类法进行组织。结果:产生了三个主题:创伤历史,社会身份和关系,以及结构决定因素。服务提供者始终认为女性是家庭性交易的弱势群体。很少有提供者提到女性与其他社会人口特征的交集,或承认较大的制度以复杂的方式使某些人长期处于边缘地位和不平等地位。结论:研究结果强调了迫切需要理解脆弱性不仅仅是一种个体状况。此外,提供者培训必须培养批判性意识,以认识脆弱性的背景根源,以及大系统在个人生活中使脆弱性永续存在的作用和社会化过程如何不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Services Insights
Health Services Insights HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信