The efficacy and safety of kappa opioid receptor (KOR) agonists in patients with uraemic pruritus: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Clinical Kidney Journal Pub Date : 2025-06-23 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1093/ckj/sfaf131
Hanqi Yang, Ming Pei, Jingbo Zhai, Zijun Zhou, Yunze Xing, Qiumei Lan, Yixin Zhu, Xuchen Wang, Bo Yang
{"title":"The efficacy and safety of kappa opioid receptor (KOR) agonists in patients with uraemic pruritus: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Hanqi Yang, Ming Pei, Jingbo Zhai, Zijun Zhou, Yunze Xing, Qiumei Lan, Yixin Zhu, Xuchen Wang, Bo Yang","doi":"10.1093/ckj/sfaf131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Uraemic pruritus (UP) is an increasingly significant health burden. However, current treatments are often unsatisfactory and associated with numerous adverse reactions. Recently, several large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have confirmed that kappa opioid receptor (KOR) agonists, which target the endogenous opioid system, are effective in controlling symptoms. We compared the efficacy and safety of currently available KOR agonists for the treatment of UP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of RCTs to assess the efficacy and safety of KOR agonists in patients with UP. The primary outcomes were pruritus-related scales and adverse events. Two independent reviewers evaluated RCTs for eligibility and extracted relevant data, with discrepancies resolved by consensus or a third reviewer. We utilized a fixed effects model within a Bayesian framework for the NMA. Dichotomous variables were presented as risk ratios (RRs) and continuous variables were merged using standardized mean differences. Statistical analyses were performed using R 4.2.3 and JAGS 4.3.0. The risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2 tool and the certainty of findings was rated according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020169955).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies with 2483 participants were included. Concerning the primary endpoints, difelikefalin at doses of 0.25 µg/kg, 0.5 µg/kg, 1.0 µg/kg and 1.5 µg/kg, nalfurafine at 2.5 µg and 5 µg and nalbuphine at 120 mg were significantly effective in reducing itching severity compared with placebo. For the secondary endpoint, all four doses of difelikefalin were associated with higher rates of adverse events compared with placebo, while other interventions showed rates comparable to those of placebo and did not present statistically significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In summary, difelikefalin at doses of 0.25 µg/kg and 0.5 µg/kg, along with nalfurafine at 0.25 µg/kg and 0.5 µg/kg, can be considered recommended therapeutic options for UP treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10435,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Kidney Journal","volume":"18 6","pages":"sfaf131"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188196/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Kidney Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfaf131","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Uraemic pruritus (UP) is an increasingly significant health burden. However, current treatments are often unsatisfactory and associated with numerous adverse reactions. Recently, several large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have confirmed that kappa opioid receptor (KOR) agonists, which target the endogenous opioid system, are effective in controlling symptoms. We compared the efficacy and safety of currently available KOR agonists for the treatment of UP.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of RCTs to assess the efficacy and safety of KOR agonists in patients with UP. The primary outcomes were pruritus-related scales and adverse events. Two independent reviewers evaluated RCTs for eligibility and extracted relevant data, with discrepancies resolved by consensus or a third reviewer. We utilized a fixed effects model within a Bayesian framework for the NMA. Dichotomous variables were presented as risk ratios (RRs) and continuous variables were merged using standardized mean differences. Statistical analyses were performed using R 4.2.3 and JAGS 4.3.0. The risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2 tool and the certainty of findings was rated according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020169955).

Results: Ten studies with 2483 participants were included. Concerning the primary endpoints, difelikefalin at doses of 0.25 µg/kg, 0.5 µg/kg, 1.0 µg/kg and 1.5 µg/kg, nalfurafine at 2.5 µg and 5 µg and nalbuphine at 120 mg were significantly effective in reducing itching severity compared with placebo. For the secondary endpoint, all four doses of difelikefalin were associated with higher rates of adverse events compared with placebo, while other interventions showed rates comparable to those of placebo and did not present statistically significant differences.

Conclusion: In summary, difelikefalin at doses of 0.25 µg/kg and 0.5 µg/kg, along with nalfurafine at 0.25 µg/kg and 0.5 µg/kg, can be considered recommended therapeutic options for UP treatment.

kappa阿片受体(KOR)激动剂治疗尿毒性瘙痒的疗效和安全性:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。
背景:尿毒性瘙痒症(UP)是一种日益严重的健康负担。然而,目前的治疗往往不令人满意,并伴有许多不良反应。最近,几项大型随机对照试验(RCTs)证实,以内源性阿片系统为靶点的kappa阿片受体(KOR)激动剂可有效控制症状。我们比较了目前可用的KOR激动剂治疗UP的疗效和安全性。方法:我们对随机对照试验进行了系统回顾和网络荟萃分析(NMA),以评估KOR激动剂对UP患者的疗效和安全性。主要结局是瘙痒相关量表和不良事件。两名独立审稿人评估rct的合格性并提取相关数据,差异由共识或第三方审稿人解决。我们在贝叶斯框架内对NMA使用了固定效果模型。二分类变量用风险比(rr)表示,连续变量用标准化平均差合并。采用r4.2.3和JAGS 4.3.0进行统计学分析。使用RoB 2工具评估偏倚风险,并根据分级建议评估、发展和评价标准对结果的确定性进行评级。研究方案已在PROSPERO上注册(CRD42020169955)。结果:纳入10项研究,共2483名受试者。关于主要终点,与安慰剂相比,异花灵剂量为0.25µg/kg、0.5µg/kg、1.0µg/kg和1.5µg/kg,纳氟芬剂量为2.5µg和5µg,纳布啡剂量为120 mg,在减轻瘙痒严重程度方面显着有效。对于次要终点,与安慰剂相比,所有四种剂量的异花蓟林都与更高的不良事件发生率相关,而其他干预措施的发生率与安慰剂相当,没有统计学上的显着差异。结论:综上所述,0.25µg/kg和0.5µg/kg剂量的异花草素,以及0.25µg/kg和0.5µg/kg剂量的纳氟萘芬,可被视为UP治疗的推荐治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Kidney Journal
Clinical Kidney Journal Medicine-Transplantation
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
10.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: About the Journal Clinical Kidney Journal: Clinical and Translational Nephrology (ckj), an official journal of the ERA-EDTA (European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association), is a fully open access, online only journal publishing bimonthly. The journal is an essential educational and training resource integrating clinical, translational and educational research into clinical practice. ckj aims to contribute to a translational research culture among nephrologists and kidney pathologists that helps close the gap between basic researchers and practicing clinicians and promote sorely needed innovation in the Nephrology field. All research articles in this journal have undergone peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信