Redefining the Use of Regorafenib and Trifluridine/Tipiracil Without Bevacizumab in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Findings from the ReTrITA Study.
Carlo Signorelli, Maria Alessandra Calegari, Annunziato Anghelone, Alessandro Passardi, Chiara Gallio, Alessandro Bittoni, Jessica Lucchetti, Lorenzo Angotti, Emanuela Di Giacomo, Ina Valeria Zurlo, Cristina Morelli, Emanuela Dell'Aquila, Adele Artemi, Donatello Gemma, Alessandra Emiliani, Marta Ribelli, Domenico Cristiano Corsi, Giulia Arrivi, Federica Mazzuca, Federica Zoratto, Mario Giovanni Chilelli, Marta Schirripa, Francesco Schietroma, Maria Grazia Morandi, Fiorenza Santamaria, Manuela Dettori, Antonella Cosimati, Rosa Saltarelli, Alessandro Minelli, Emanuela Lucci-Cordisco, Michele Basso
{"title":"Redefining the Use of Regorafenib and Trifluridine/Tipiracil Without Bevacizumab in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Findings from the ReTrITA Study.","authors":"Carlo Signorelli, Maria Alessandra Calegari, Annunziato Anghelone, Alessandro Passardi, Chiara Gallio, Alessandro Bittoni, Jessica Lucchetti, Lorenzo Angotti, Emanuela Di Giacomo, Ina Valeria Zurlo, Cristina Morelli, Emanuela Dell'Aquila, Adele Artemi, Donatello Gemma, Alessandra Emiliani, Marta Ribelli, Domenico Cristiano Corsi, Giulia Arrivi, Federica Mazzuca, Federica Zoratto, Mario Giovanni Chilelli, Marta Schirripa, Francesco Schietroma, Maria Grazia Morandi, Fiorenza Santamaria, Manuela Dettori, Antonella Cosimati, Rosa Saltarelli, Alessandro Minelli, Emanuela Lucci-Cordisco, Michele Basso","doi":"10.3390/cancers17122037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Regorafenib (R) and trifluridine/tipiracil (T) are approved treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in refractory cases. However, the optimal sequencing of these agents is unknown. The ReTrITA study planned to assess the real-world efficacy of R and T, administered either sequentially or as monotherapy, in a large Italian multicentre population. <i>Methods:</i> This retrospective observational analysis comprised 1156 mCRC patients treated between 2012 and 2023 at 17 Italian cancer centres. Patients were divided into four groups: sequential T/R (<i>n</i> = 261), sequential R/T (<i>n</i> = 155), R monotherapy (<i>n</i> = 313), and T monotherapy (<i>n</i> = 427). The primary objectives were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary goals being disease control rate, objective response rate, and treatment-related toxicity. <i>Results:</i> The monotherapy cohorts showed no significant difference in OS (R: 5.0 months; T: 5.9 months; <i>p</i> = 0.8371) or PFS (R: 3.2 months; T: 3.3 months; <i>p</i> = 0.6531). Compared to T/R, the sequential R/T group had significantly better outcomes: median OS was 16.6 vs. 12.6 months (HR = 0.67; <i>p</i> = 0.0004), and median PFS was 11.5 vs. 8.5 months (HR = 0.60; <i>p</i> < 0.0001). The survival advantage of R/T was consistent across clinical subgroups. The toxicity profiles were comparable with known safety data, with a lower prevalence of neutropenia reported in the R/T sequence. <i>Conclusions:</i> ReTrITA confirms the efficacy of R and T as monotherapies and provides compelling real-world evidence that the R/T sequence improves survival in refractory mCRC. These findings support a regorafenib-first approach in patients who are eligible, and they emphasise the need for future research into combination strategies and comparisons with newer drugs such as fruquintinib.</p>","PeriodicalId":9681,"journal":{"name":"Cancers","volume":"17 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12191189/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17122037","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Regorafenib (R) and trifluridine/tipiracil (T) are approved treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in refractory cases. However, the optimal sequencing of these agents is unknown. The ReTrITA study planned to assess the real-world efficacy of R and T, administered either sequentially or as monotherapy, in a large Italian multicentre population. Methods: This retrospective observational analysis comprised 1156 mCRC patients treated between 2012 and 2023 at 17 Italian cancer centres. Patients were divided into four groups: sequential T/R (n = 261), sequential R/T (n = 155), R monotherapy (n = 313), and T monotherapy (n = 427). The primary objectives were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary goals being disease control rate, objective response rate, and treatment-related toxicity. Results: The monotherapy cohorts showed no significant difference in OS (R: 5.0 months; T: 5.9 months; p = 0.8371) or PFS (R: 3.2 months; T: 3.3 months; p = 0.6531). Compared to T/R, the sequential R/T group had significantly better outcomes: median OS was 16.6 vs. 12.6 months (HR = 0.67; p = 0.0004), and median PFS was 11.5 vs. 8.5 months (HR = 0.60; p < 0.0001). The survival advantage of R/T was consistent across clinical subgroups. The toxicity profiles were comparable with known safety data, with a lower prevalence of neutropenia reported in the R/T sequence. Conclusions: ReTrITA confirms the efficacy of R and T as monotherapies and provides compelling real-world evidence that the R/T sequence improves survival in refractory mCRC. These findings support a regorafenib-first approach in patients who are eligible, and they emphasise the need for future research into combination strategies and comparisons with newer drugs such as fruquintinib.
期刊介绍:
Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal on oncology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.