Iterative Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC for Peritoneal Metastases from Primary Appendiceal and Colorectal Cancers: An Observational Study.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Cancers Pub Date : 2025-06-17 DOI:10.3390/cancers17122014
Andrew M Fleming, Owen M Clark, Jaewon J Lee, Kristen Dougherty, Leah E Hendrick, Jordan Raine, Ian Solsky, Paxton V Dickson, Evan S Glazer, David Shibata, Elizabeth Gleeson, Gitonga Munene, Jeremiah L Deneve
{"title":"Iterative Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC for Peritoneal Metastases from Primary Appendiceal and Colorectal Cancers: An Observational Study.","authors":"Andrew M Fleming, Owen M Clark, Jaewon J Lee, Kristen Dougherty, Leah E Hendrick, Jordan Raine, Ian Solsky, Paxton V Dickson, Evan S Glazer, David Shibata, Elizabeth Gleeson, Gitonga Munene, Jeremiah L Deneve","doi":"10.3390/cancers17122014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Peritoneal relapse after cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is common. Repeat CRS/HIPEC offers the potential for long-term survival in the appropriately selected patient. <b>Methods</b>: We performed a retrospective review of a single institution database to assess perioperative outcomes after repeat CRS/HIPEC for appendiceal (pAC) and colorectal (pCRC) cancers. Kaplan-Meier and Cox estimates were used to assess survival. <b>Results</b>: Of 157 patients, 103 patients underwent initial CRS/HIPEC for pAC (<i>n</i> = 67) or pCRC (<i>n</i> = 36) histologies. Twenty-seven pAC patients (27/67, 40%) and 23/36 pCRC patients (63%) developed disease recurrence. Relapsed patients had a higher burden of disease (PCI), operative length and blood loss and received adjuvant chemotherapy (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). Nine of the 27 relapsed pAC patients and 5 of the 13 relapsed pCRC patients underwent repeat CRS/HIPEC. The median time to repeat CRS/HIPEC was 18 months (4-26 months), and a CCR-0 and CCR-1 were achieved in 79% and 21%, respectively. The 1-, 3- and 5-year OS for pAC patients who underwent repeat CRS/HIPEC was 88.9%, 88.9% and 77.8%, and the 1- and 3-year OS for pCRC patients was 100% and 25%, respectively. Repeat CRS/HIPEC for pAC was associated with significant improvement in OS (<i>p</i> = 0.03), while for pCRC, no significant difference was observed (<i>p</i> = 0.99). <b>Conclusions</b>: Repeat CRS/HIPEC for isolated peritoneal recurrence is safe and offers the potential for long-term survival. Patient selection is key to ensure optimal cytoreduction when considering repeat CRS/HIPEC.</p>","PeriodicalId":9681,"journal":{"name":"Cancers","volume":"17 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12191129/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17122014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Peritoneal relapse after cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is common. Repeat CRS/HIPEC offers the potential for long-term survival in the appropriately selected patient. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of a single institution database to assess perioperative outcomes after repeat CRS/HIPEC for appendiceal (pAC) and colorectal (pCRC) cancers. Kaplan-Meier and Cox estimates were used to assess survival. Results: Of 157 patients, 103 patients underwent initial CRS/HIPEC for pAC (n = 67) or pCRC (n = 36) histologies. Twenty-seven pAC patients (27/67, 40%) and 23/36 pCRC patients (63%) developed disease recurrence. Relapsed patients had a higher burden of disease (PCI), operative length and blood loss and received adjuvant chemotherapy (all p < 0.05). Nine of the 27 relapsed pAC patients and 5 of the 13 relapsed pCRC patients underwent repeat CRS/HIPEC. The median time to repeat CRS/HIPEC was 18 months (4-26 months), and a CCR-0 and CCR-1 were achieved in 79% and 21%, respectively. The 1-, 3- and 5-year OS for pAC patients who underwent repeat CRS/HIPEC was 88.9%, 88.9% and 77.8%, and the 1- and 3-year OS for pCRC patients was 100% and 25%, respectively. Repeat CRS/HIPEC for pAC was associated with significant improvement in OS (p = 0.03), while for pCRC, no significant difference was observed (p = 0.99). Conclusions: Repeat CRS/HIPEC for isolated peritoneal recurrence is safe and offers the potential for long-term survival. Patient selection is key to ensure optimal cytoreduction when considering repeat CRS/HIPEC.

反复细胞减少手术和HIPEC治疗原发性阑尾癌和结直肠癌的腹膜转移:一项观察性研究。
背景:细胞减少和腹腔热化疗(CRS/HIPEC)后腹膜复发是常见的。在适当选择的患者中,重复CRS/HIPEC提供了长期生存的潜力。方法:我们对单一机构数据库进行回顾性分析,以评估阑尾(pAC)和结直肠癌(pCRC)重复CRS/HIPEC后的围手术期结果。Kaplan-Meier和Cox估计用于评估生存率。结果:157例患者中,103例患者因pAC (n = 67)或pCRC (n = 36)组织学接受了初始CRS/HIPEC检查。27例pAC患者(27/ 67,40%)和23/36例pCRC患者(63%)出现疾病复发。复发患者的疾病负担(PCI)、手术时间、出血量较高,且接受辅助化疗(p < 0.05)。27例复发pAC患者中的9例和13例复发pCRC患者中的5例接受了重复CRS/HIPEC。重复CRS/HIPEC的中位时间为18个月(4-26个月),达到CCR-0和CCR-1的比例分别为79%和21%。pAC患者接受重复CRS/HIPEC的1年、3年和5年OS分别为88.9%、88.9%和77.8%,pCRC患者的1年和3年OS分别为100%和25%。对于pAC,重复CRS/HIPEC与OS的显著改善相关(p = 0.03),而对于pCRC,没有观察到显著差异(p = 0.99)。结论:重复CRS/HIPEC治疗孤立性腹膜复发是安全的,并具有长期生存的潜力。当考虑重复CRS/HIPEC时,患者选择是确保最佳细胞减少的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancers
Cancers Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
9.60%
发文量
5371
审稿时长
18.07 days
期刊介绍: Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal on oncology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信