Dosimetric Advantage of Scanning Beam Proton Therapy in Gynecologic Patients Receiving Adjuvant Radiotherapy.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Cancers Pub Date : 2025-06-17 DOI:10.3390/cancers17122010
Rachel B Ger, Jarrod M Lentz, Joshua S Niedzielski, Sujay A Vora, Martin Bues, Danairis Hernandez Morales, Justin D Anderson, Christopher J Kutyreff, Christie A Schulz, Pedro R Lara, Ana K Ridgway, Pamela R Lemish, Justin D Gagneur, Aman Anand
{"title":"Dosimetric Advantage of Scanning Beam Proton Therapy in Gynecologic Patients Receiving Adjuvant Radiotherapy.","authors":"Rachel B Ger, Jarrod M Lentz, Joshua S Niedzielski, Sujay A Vora, Martin Bues, Danairis Hernandez Morales, Justin D Anderson, Christopher J Kutyreff, Christie A Schulz, Pedro R Lara, Ana K Ridgway, Pamela R Lemish, Justin D Gagneur, Aman Anand","doi":"10.3390/cancers17122010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Adjuvant radiation for gynecologic malignancies often exposes organs at risk (OARs), such as the bone marrow, bowel, rectum, and bladder, to radiation, leading to toxicities that impact treatment tolerance and patient quality of life. Scanning proton beam therapy, particularly with Individual Field Simultaneous Optimization (IFSO), may offer dosimetric and biological advantages over volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). This study evaluates the clinical impact of IFSO-based proton planning in post-operative gynecologic cancer patients. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Fourteen patients receiving adjuvant proton therapy to 45 Gy in 25 fractions were retrospectively analyzed. Comparison VMAT plans were generated on the same datasets. Dose-volume metrics for key OARs and normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) were compared using paired statistical tests. Robustness evaluations accounted for setup and range uncertainties. <b>Results:</b> Proton plans significantly reduced dose to bone marrow (V10Gy: 58% vs. 86%, <i>p</i> < 0.00001; V20Gy: 47% vs. 58%, <i>p</i> < 0.00001), small bowel (V20Gy: 21% vs. 56%, <i>p</i> < 0.00001), and femoral heads (left femoral head mean: 11Gy vs. 13Gy, <i>p</i> = 0.032; right femoral head mean: 11Gy vs. 13Gy, <i>p</i> = 0.022). NTCP modeling predicted significantly lower rates of bowel urgency (9.4% vs. 3.3%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and hematologic toxicity (10.2% vs. 4.9%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) with proton therapy. Plans remained robust across uncertainty scenarios. <b>Conclusions:</b> IFSO-based scanning proton therapy provides clinically meaningful sparing of bone marrow and bowel, with the potential to reduce hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicities. These findings support its use in patients receiving adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy, particularly those undergoing extended field treatment or chemotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9681,"journal":{"name":"Cancers","volume":"17 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12190590/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17122010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Adjuvant radiation for gynecologic malignancies often exposes organs at risk (OARs), such as the bone marrow, bowel, rectum, and bladder, to radiation, leading to toxicities that impact treatment tolerance and patient quality of life. Scanning proton beam therapy, particularly with Individual Field Simultaneous Optimization (IFSO), may offer dosimetric and biological advantages over volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). This study evaluates the clinical impact of IFSO-based proton planning in post-operative gynecologic cancer patients. Materials and Methods: Fourteen patients receiving adjuvant proton therapy to 45 Gy in 25 fractions were retrospectively analyzed. Comparison VMAT plans were generated on the same datasets. Dose-volume metrics for key OARs and normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) were compared using paired statistical tests. Robustness evaluations accounted for setup and range uncertainties. Results: Proton plans significantly reduced dose to bone marrow (V10Gy: 58% vs. 86%, p < 0.00001; V20Gy: 47% vs. 58%, p < 0.00001), small bowel (V20Gy: 21% vs. 56%, p < 0.00001), and femoral heads (left femoral head mean: 11Gy vs. 13Gy, p = 0.032; right femoral head mean: 11Gy vs. 13Gy, p = 0.022). NTCP modeling predicted significantly lower rates of bowel urgency (9.4% vs. 3.3%, p < 0.001) and hematologic toxicity (10.2% vs. 4.9%, p < 0.001) with proton therapy. Plans remained robust across uncertainty scenarios. Conclusions: IFSO-based scanning proton therapy provides clinically meaningful sparing of bone marrow and bowel, with the potential to reduce hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicities. These findings support its use in patients receiving adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy, particularly those undergoing extended field treatment or chemotherapy.

扫描束质子治疗在妇科辅助放疗患者中的剂量学优势。
背景/目的:妇科恶性肿瘤的辅助放疗常常使危险器官(OARs),如骨髓、肠、直肠和膀胱暴露在辐射下,导致影响治疗耐受性和患者生活质量的毒性。扫描质子束治疗,特别是单场同步优化(IFSO),可能比体积调制电弧治疗(VMAT)具有剂量学和生物学上的优势。本研究评估基于ifso的质子计划在妇科癌症患者术后的临床影响。材料与方法:回顾性分析14例接受45 Gy辅助质子治疗的25组患者。在相同的数据集上生成比较VMAT计划。使用配对统计检验比较关键OARs的剂量-体积指标和正常组织并发症概率(NTCPs)。稳健性评估考虑了设置和范围的不确定性。结果:质子计划显著降低骨髓剂量(V10Gy: 58% vs. 86%, p < 0.00001;V20Gy: 47% vs. 58%, p < 0.00001),小肠(V20Gy: 21% vs. 56%, p < 0.00001),股骨头(左股骨头平均值:11Gy vs. 13Gy, p = 0.032;右股骨头平均值:11Gy vs. 13Gy, p = 0.022)。NTCP模型预测质子治疗的肠急症发生率(9.4% vs. 3.3%, p < 0.001)和血液学毒性(10.2% vs. 4.9%, p < 0.001)显著降低。在不确定的情况下,计划仍保持稳健。结论:基于ifso的扫描质子治疗提供了具有临床意义的骨髓和肠道保护,具有减少血液学和胃肠道毒性的潜力。这些发现支持其在接受辅助盆腔放疗的患者中的应用,特别是那些接受扩展野治疗或化疗的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancers
Cancers Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
9.60%
发文量
5371
审稿时长
18.07 days
期刊介绍: Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal on oncology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信