Comparison of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy and Surgery for Stage I Lung Cancer: A Multidisciplinary Cohort Study Utilizing Propensity Score Overlap Weighting and AI-Based CT Imaging Analysis.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Cancers Pub Date : 2025-06-17 DOI:10.3390/cancers17122015
Eun Hye Lee, Young Joo Suh, Jong Won Park, Jisu Moon, Sangjoon Park, Chang Geol Lee, Hong In Yoon, Byung Jo Park, Jin Gu Lee, Dae Joon Kim, Seung Hyun Yong, Sang Hoon Lee, Chang Young Lee, Jaeho Cho, Eun Young Kim
{"title":"Comparison of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy and Surgery for Stage I Lung Cancer: A Multidisciplinary Cohort Study Utilizing Propensity Score Overlap Weighting and AI-Based CT Imaging Analysis.","authors":"Eun Hye Lee, Young Joo Suh, Jong Won Park, Jisu Moon, Sangjoon Park, Chang Geol Lee, Hong In Yoon, Byung Jo Park, Jin Gu Lee, Dae Joon Kim, Seung Hyun Yong, Sang Hoon Lee, Chang Young Lee, Jaeho Cho, Eun Young Kim","doi":"10.3390/cancers17122015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> With rising life expectancy and widespread lung cancer screening, early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) incidence has increased. While surgery is the standard treatment for operable stage I NSCLC, many patients are ineligible due to age or comorbidities. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has achieved good primary tumor control rates and overall survival. This study compares the outcomes of SBRT and surgery for stage I NSCLC using propensity score overlap-weighted dataset. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective study analyzed clinical stage I NSCLC patients treated at a tertiary hospital from 2012 to 2021. Baseline differences between SBRT and surgery groups were adjusted using overlap weighting. AI-based CT analysis (CT AI-CAD) assessed tumor characteristics, verified by radiologists. Primary outcomes were 5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence and overall survival, with subgroup analyses based on tumor features. <b>Results:</b> Of 1474 patients, 1258 underwent surgery, and 216 received SBRT. After overlap weighting, baseline characteristics were well balanced. The 5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence and OS showed no statistically significant differences between SBRT and surgery groups (recurrence: 16.2% vs. 16.1%; OS: 80.5% vs. 82.9%). Further AI-based CT subgroup analysis showed no significant differences in recurrence rates across tumor features. A solid tumor diameter associated with a significant increase in recurrence was identified as 16.6 mm for SBRT and 18.6 mm for surgery. <b>Conclusions:</b> After overlap weighting, SBRT and surgery showed no statistically significant differences in treatment outcomes in stage I NSCLC. These findings may help guide the timing and selection of safe and effective treatment approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":9681,"journal":{"name":"Cancers","volume":"17 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12190411/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17122015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With rising life expectancy and widespread lung cancer screening, early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) incidence has increased. While surgery is the standard treatment for operable stage I NSCLC, many patients are ineligible due to age or comorbidities. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has achieved good primary tumor control rates and overall survival. This study compares the outcomes of SBRT and surgery for stage I NSCLC using propensity score overlap-weighted dataset. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed clinical stage I NSCLC patients treated at a tertiary hospital from 2012 to 2021. Baseline differences between SBRT and surgery groups were adjusted using overlap weighting. AI-based CT analysis (CT AI-CAD) assessed tumor characteristics, verified by radiologists. Primary outcomes were 5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence and overall survival, with subgroup analyses based on tumor features. Results: Of 1474 patients, 1258 underwent surgery, and 216 received SBRT. After overlap weighting, baseline characteristics were well balanced. The 5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence and OS showed no statistically significant differences between SBRT and surgery groups (recurrence: 16.2% vs. 16.1%; OS: 80.5% vs. 82.9%). Further AI-based CT subgroup analysis showed no significant differences in recurrence rates across tumor features. A solid tumor diameter associated with a significant increase in recurrence was identified as 16.6 mm for SBRT and 18.6 mm for surgery. Conclusions: After overlap weighting, SBRT and surgery showed no statistically significant differences in treatment outcomes in stage I NSCLC. These findings may help guide the timing and selection of safe and effective treatment approaches.

立体定向放疗和手术治疗I期肺癌的比较:一项多学科队列研究,利用倾向评分重叠加权和基于人工智能的CT成像分析。
背景:随着预期寿命的提高和肺癌筛查的广泛开展,早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的发病率有所增加。虽然手术是可手术I期非小细胞肺癌的标准治疗方法,但由于年龄或合并症,许多患者不适合手术。立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)取得了良好的原发肿瘤控制率和总生存率。本研究使用倾向评分重叠加权数据集比较了SBRT和手术治疗I期NSCLC的结果。方法:回顾性分析某三级医院2012 - 2021年收治的I期非小细胞肺癌患者。使用重叠加权调整SBRT组和手术组之间的基线差异。基于人工智能的CT分析(CT AI-CAD)评估肿瘤特征,由放射科医生验证。主要结局是5年累积复发率和总生存率,并根据肿瘤特征进行亚组分析。结果:1474例患者中,1258例接受了手术,216例接受了SBRT。重叠加权后,基线特征得到很好的平衡。5年累积复发率和OS在SBRT组和手术组之间无统计学差异(复发率:16.2% vs. 16.1%;OS: 80.5% vs. 82.9%)。进一步的基于人工智能的CT亚组分析显示,不同肿瘤特征的复发率没有显著差异。与复发显著增加相关的实体瘤直径被确定为SBRT为16.6 mm,手术为18.6 mm。结论:重叠加权后,SBRT与手术治疗I期NSCLC的治疗结果无统计学差异。这些发现可能有助于指导时机和选择安全有效的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancers
Cancers Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
9.60%
发文量
5371
审稿时长
18.07 days
期刊介绍: Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal on oncology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信