Are Cannabis-Based Medicines a Useful Treatment for Neuropathic Pain? A Systematic Review.

IF 4.8 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Biomolecules Pub Date : 2025-06-04 DOI:10.3390/biom15060816
Nawaf Almuntashiri, Basma M El Sharazly, Wayne G Carter
{"title":"Are Cannabis-Based Medicines a Useful Treatment for Neuropathic Pain? A Systematic Review.","authors":"Nawaf Almuntashiri, Basma M El Sharazly, Wayne G Carter","doi":"10.3390/biom15060816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neuropathic pain is a chronic disorder that arises from damaged or malfunctioning nerves. Hypersensitivity to stimuli, also known as hyperalgesia, can cause a person to experience pain from non-painful stimuli, termed allodynia. Cannabis-based medicines (CBMs) may provide new treatment options to manage neuropathic pain. A review of the relevant studies was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of CBMs in treating neuropathic pain. Scientific literature was systematically searched from January 2003 to December 2024 using the Web of Science Core Collection, PubMed, and MEDLINE. A total of 22 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified that considered the use of 1',1'-dimethylheptyl-Δ<sup>8</sup>-tetrahydrocannabinol-11-oic acid (CT-3), Δ<sup>9</sup>-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC), cannabidiol (CBD), combinations of Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC with CBD, and cannabidivarin for treatment of neuropathic pain. Significant reductions in pain were reported in 15 studies focused on the treatment of multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injuries, diabetic neuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia, HIV-associated sensory neuropathy, peripheral neuropathic pain, complex regional pain syndrome, chronic radicular neuropathic pain, and peripheral neuropathy of the lower extremities. These positive outcomes often adopted personalized and adjusted dosing strategies. By contrast, seven RCTs observed no significant pain relief compared to placebo, although some had minor improvements in secondary outcomes, such as mood and sleep. Collectively, CBM treatments may improve pain scores, but study limitations such as small sample sizes and study durations, high placebo response rates, and trial unblinding because of the psychoactive effects of cannabinoids all hinder data interpretation and the extrapolation to chronic pain conditions. Hence, future RCTs will need to have larger numbers and be more extended studies that explore optimal dosing and delivery methods and identify patient subgroups that are most likely to benefit. While CBMs show potential, their current use balances modest benefits against possible adverse effects and variable outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8943,"journal":{"name":"Biomolecules","volume":"15 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12190838/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomolecules","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15060816","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neuropathic pain is a chronic disorder that arises from damaged or malfunctioning nerves. Hypersensitivity to stimuli, also known as hyperalgesia, can cause a person to experience pain from non-painful stimuli, termed allodynia. Cannabis-based medicines (CBMs) may provide new treatment options to manage neuropathic pain. A review of the relevant studies was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of CBMs in treating neuropathic pain. Scientific literature was systematically searched from January 2003 to December 2024 using the Web of Science Core Collection, PubMed, and MEDLINE. A total of 22 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified that considered the use of 1',1'-dimethylheptyl-Δ8-tetrahydrocannabinol-11-oic acid (CT-3), Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC), cannabidiol (CBD), combinations of Δ9-THC with CBD, and cannabidivarin for treatment of neuropathic pain. Significant reductions in pain were reported in 15 studies focused on the treatment of multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injuries, diabetic neuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia, HIV-associated sensory neuropathy, peripheral neuropathic pain, complex regional pain syndrome, chronic radicular neuropathic pain, and peripheral neuropathy of the lower extremities. These positive outcomes often adopted personalized and adjusted dosing strategies. By contrast, seven RCTs observed no significant pain relief compared to placebo, although some had minor improvements in secondary outcomes, such as mood and sleep. Collectively, CBM treatments may improve pain scores, but study limitations such as small sample sizes and study durations, high placebo response rates, and trial unblinding because of the psychoactive effects of cannabinoids all hinder data interpretation and the extrapolation to chronic pain conditions. Hence, future RCTs will need to have larger numbers and be more extended studies that explore optimal dosing and delivery methods and identify patient subgroups that are most likely to benefit. While CBMs show potential, their current use balances modest benefits against possible adverse effects and variable outcomes.

大麻类药物是神经性疼痛的有效治疗方法吗?系统评价。
神经性疼痛是一种由神经损伤或功能障碍引起的慢性疾病。对刺激的超敏性,也被称为痛觉过敏,可以导致一个人从非痛觉刺激中经历疼痛,称为异常性疼痛。基于大麻的药物(CBMs)可能为神经性疼痛的治疗提供新的选择。通过对相关研究的回顾,评价CBMs治疗神经性疼痛的有效性。从2003年1月到2024年12月,使用Web of Science Core Collection、PubMed和MEDLINE系统地检索了科学文献。共有22项随机对照试验(rct)考虑使用1',1'-二甲基heptyl-Δ8-tetrahydrocannabinol-11-oic酸(CT-3), Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC),大麻二酚(CBD), Δ9-THC与CBD联合使用,以及大麻二酚治疗神经性疼痛。有15项研究报道了疼痛的显著减轻,这些研究集中在多发性硬化症、脊髓损伤、糖尿病性神经病变、疱疹后神经痛、hiv相关感觉神经病变、周围神经性疼痛、复杂区域疼痛综合征、慢性神经根性疼痛和下肢周围神经病变的治疗上。这些积极结果通常采用个性化和调整剂量策略。相比之下,与安慰剂相比,7项随机对照试验没有观察到明显的疼痛缓解,尽管一些次要结果有轻微的改善,如情绪和睡眠。总的来说,CBM治疗可能会改善疼痛评分,但研究的局限性,如小样本量和研究持续时间,高安慰剂反应率,以及由于大麻素的精神活性作用而导致的试验解盲,都阻碍了数据解释和对慢性疼痛状况的外推。因此,未来的随机对照试验需要有更大的数量和更广泛的研究,以探索最佳剂量和给药方法,并确定最有可能受益的患者亚组。虽然信任措施显示出潜力,但它们目前的使用平衡了适度的效益与可能的不利影响和可变的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomolecules
Biomolecules Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Biology
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
3.60%
发文量
1640
审稿时长
18.28 days
期刊介绍: Biomolecules (ISSN 2218-273X) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal focusing on biogenic substances and their biological functions, structures, interactions with other molecules, and their microenvironment as well as biological systems. Biomolecules publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications.  Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信