Deep-Learning-Based Computer-Aided Grading of Cervical Spinal Stenosis from MR Images: Accuracy and Clinical Alignment.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Zhiling Wang, Xinquan Chen, Bin Liu, Jinjin Hai, Kai Qiao, Zhen Yuan, Lianjun Yang, Bin Yan, Zhihai Su, Hai Lu
{"title":"Deep-Learning-Based Computer-Aided Grading of Cervical Spinal Stenosis from MR Images: Accuracy and Clinical Alignment.","authors":"Zhiling Wang, Xinquan Chen, Bin Liu, Jinjin Hai, Kai Qiao, Zhen Yuan, Lianjun Yang, Bin Yan, Zhihai Su, Hai Lu","doi":"10.3390/bioengineering12060604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study aims to apply different deep learning convolutional neural network algorithms to assess the grading of cervical spinal stenosis and to evaluate their consistency with clinician grading results as well as clinical manifestations of patients. <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively enrolled 954 patients with cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data and medical records from the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun-Yat Sen University. The Kang grading method for sagittal MR images of the cervical spine and the spinal cord compression ratio for horizontal MR images of the cervical spine were adopted for cervical spinal canal stenosis grading. The collected data were randomly divided into training/validation and test sets. The training/validation sets were processed by various image preprocessing and annotation methods, in which deep learning convolutional networks, including classification, target detection, and key point localization models, were applied. The predictive grading of the test set by the model was finally contrasted with the grading results of the clinicians, and correlation analysis was performed with the clinical manifestations of the patients. <b>Result:</b> The EfficientNet_B5 model achieved a five-fold cross-validated accuracy of 79.45% and near-perfect agreement with clinician grading on the test set (<i>κ</i>= 0.848, 0.822), surpassing resident-clinician consistency (<i>κ</i> = 0.732, 0.702). The model-derived compression ratio (0.45 ± 0.07) did not differ significantly from manual measurements (0.46 ± 0.07). Correlation analysis showed moderate associations between model outputs and clinical symptoms: EfficientNet_B5 grades (<i>r</i> = 0.526) were comparable to clinician assessments (<i>r</i> = 0.517, 0.503) and higher than those of residents (<i>r</i> = 0.457, 0.448). <b>Conclusion:</b> CNN models demonstrate strong performance in the objective, consistent, and efficient grading of cervical spinal stenosis severity, offering potential clinical value in automated diagnostic support.</p>","PeriodicalId":8874,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering","volume":"12 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12189467/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12060604","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to apply different deep learning convolutional neural network algorithms to assess the grading of cervical spinal stenosis and to evaluate their consistency with clinician grading results as well as clinical manifestations of patients. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 954 patients with cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data and medical records from the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun-Yat Sen University. The Kang grading method for sagittal MR images of the cervical spine and the spinal cord compression ratio for horizontal MR images of the cervical spine were adopted for cervical spinal canal stenosis grading. The collected data were randomly divided into training/validation and test sets. The training/validation sets were processed by various image preprocessing and annotation methods, in which deep learning convolutional networks, including classification, target detection, and key point localization models, were applied. The predictive grading of the test set by the model was finally contrasted with the grading results of the clinicians, and correlation analysis was performed with the clinical manifestations of the patients. Result: The EfficientNet_B5 model achieved a five-fold cross-validated accuracy of 79.45% and near-perfect agreement with clinician grading on the test set (κ= 0.848, 0.822), surpassing resident-clinician consistency (κ = 0.732, 0.702). The model-derived compression ratio (0.45 ± 0.07) did not differ significantly from manual measurements (0.46 ± 0.07). Correlation analysis showed moderate associations between model outputs and clinical symptoms: EfficientNet_B5 grades (r = 0.526) were comparable to clinician assessments (r = 0.517, 0.503) and higher than those of residents (r = 0.457, 0.448). Conclusion: CNN models demonstrate strong performance in the objective, consistent, and efficient grading of cervical spinal stenosis severity, offering potential clinical value in automated diagnostic support.

基于深度学习的计算机辅助分级颈椎管狭窄从MR图像:准确性和临床校准。
目的:本研究旨在应用不同的深度学习卷积神经网络算法来评估颈椎管狭窄的分级,并评估其与临床医生分级结果以及患者临床表现的一致性。方法:回顾性收集中山大学第五附属医院954例颈椎磁共振成像(MRI)资料和病历。颈椎矢状面MR图像采用Kang分级法,颈椎水平面MR图像采用脊髓压缩比分级。收集的数据随机分为训练/验证集和测试集。训练/验证集通过各种图像预处理和标注方法进行处理,其中使用深度学习卷积网络,包括分类、目标检测和关键点定位模型。最后将模型对测试集的预测评分与临床医生的评分结果进行对比,并与患者的临床表现进行相关性分析。结果:EfficientNet_B5模型获得了五倍交叉验证的准确率,达到79.45%,与临床医生在测试集上的评分接近完美吻合(κ= 0.848, 0.822),超过了住院医生与临床医生的一致性(κ= 0.732, 0.702)。模型导出的压缩比(0.45±0.07)与人工测量值(0.46±0.07)无显著差异。相关分析显示,模型输出与临床症状之间存在中度相关性:有效率net_b5评分(r = 0.526)与临床医生评估相当(r = 0.517, 0.503),高于居民评估(r = 0.457, 0.448)。结论:CNN模型在客观、一致和有效地评定颈椎管狭窄程度方面表现出色,在自动化诊断支持方面具有潜在的临床价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bioengineering
Bioengineering Chemical Engineering-Bioengineering
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.70%
发文量
661
期刊介绍: Aims Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of bioengineering. It publishes original research papers, comprehensive reviews, communications and case reports. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. All aspects of bioengineering are welcomed from theoretical concepts to education and applications. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, four key features of this Journal: ● We are introducing a new concept in scientific and technical publications “The Translational Case Report in Bioengineering”. It is a descriptive explanatory analysis of a transformative or translational event. Understanding that the goal of bioengineering scholarship is to advance towards a transformative or clinical solution to an identified transformative/clinical need, the translational case report is used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles that may guide other similar transformative/translational undertakings. ● Manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed. ● Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material. ● We also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds. Scope ● Bionics and biological cybernetics: implantology; bio–abio interfaces ● Bioelectronics: wearable electronics; implantable electronics; “more than Moore” electronics; bioelectronics devices ● Bioprocess and biosystems engineering and applications: bioprocess design; biocatalysis; bioseparation and bioreactors; bioinformatics; bioenergy; etc. ● Biomolecular, cellular and tissue engineering and applications: tissue engineering; chromosome engineering; embryo engineering; cellular, molecular and synthetic biology; metabolic engineering; bio-nanotechnology; micro/nano technologies; genetic engineering; transgenic technology ● Biomedical engineering and applications: biomechatronics; biomedical electronics; biomechanics; biomaterials; biomimetics; biomedical diagnostics; biomedical therapy; biomedical devices; sensors and circuits; biomedical imaging and medical information systems; implants and regenerative medicine; neurotechnology; clinical engineering; rehabilitation engineering ● Biochemical engineering and applications: metabolic pathway engineering; modeling and simulation ● Translational bioengineering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信