The impact of changing diagnostic criteria on disability in a Brazilian multiple sclerosis cohort.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-25 DOI:10.1055/s-0045-1809662
Felipe Toscano Lins de Menezes, Jéssica Monique Dias Alencar, Alexandre Bussinger Lopes, Leizian de Souza Amorim, Raquel Paiva Portugal, Flávia Timbó Albuquerque, Natasha Pryanca de Araújo Bessa, Larissa Sabino Ferreira Vicente, Nilton Amorim de Souza, Denis Bernardi Bichuetti, Enedina Maria Lobato de Oliveira
{"title":"The impact of changing diagnostic criteria on disability in a Brazilian multiple sclerosis cohort.","authors":"Felipe Toscano Lins de Menezes, Jéssica Monique Dias Alencar, Alexandre Bussinger Lopes, Leizian de Souza Amorim, Raquel Paiva Portugal, Flávia Timbó Albuquerque, Natasha Pryanca de Araújo Bessa, Larissa Sabino Ferreira Vicente, Nilton Amorim de Souza, Denis Bernardi Bichuetti, Enedina Maria Lobato de Oliveira","doi":"10.1055/s-0045-1809662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Updating multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnostic criteria over recent decades may have impacted disability progression.To assess the effects of the passage of time and changes in diagnostic criteria on disability.A retrospective study of Brazilian people with relapsing-remitting MS from 1994 to 2019. Descriptive analysis compared three periods based on admission: Epoch 1 (1994-2001), 2 (2002-2010), and 3 (2011-2019). Cox regressions were performed for the outcomes of the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) 6.0 and conversion to secondary progressive MS (SPMS). We compared the three Epochs in sequence, the Poser with all McDonald criteria combined, and Poser versus each McDonald criteria (2001, 2005, 2010, and 2017). A multivariate logistic regression assessed the impact of diagnostic criteria on patients reaching EDSS 6.0.Time to diagnosis and treatment decreased across Epochs. For reaching EDSS 6.0, the Cox regression indicated a hazard ratio (HR) 63% lower for Epoch 3 compared with 1, an HR 50% lower for the McDonald criteria combined, and an HR 65% lower for McDonald 2010 compared with Poser. Regarding the conversion to SPMS, the HR was 53% lower for Epoch 3, 48% lower for the McDonald criteria combined, and 64% lower for McDonald 2010. The multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that incomplete recovery of initial symptoms was the main prognostic factor for reaching EDSS 6.0. However, transitioning diagnostic criteria from Poser to McDonald 2001 and 2005 decreased these odds by 54%.Newer diagnostic criteria have reduced the likelihood of reaching EDSS 6.0 and converting to SPMS over the past 25 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":8694,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria","volume":"83 6","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12196560/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1809662","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Updating multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnostic criteria over recent decades may have impacted disability progression.To assess the effects of the passage of time and changes in diagnostic criteria on disability.A retrospective study of Brazilian people with relapsing-remitting MS from 1994 to 2019. Descriptive analysis compared three periods based on admission: Epoch 1 (1994-2001), 2 (2002-2010), and 3 (2011-2019). Cox regressions were performed for the outcomes of the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) 6.0 and conversion to secondary progressive MS (SPMS). We compared the three Epochs in sequence, the Poser with all McDonald criteria combined, and Poser versus each McDonald criteria (2001, 2005, 2010, and 2017). A multivariate logistic regression assessed the impact of diagnostic criteria on patients reaching EDSS 6.0.Time to diagnosis and treatment decreased across Epochs. For reaching EDSS 6.0, the Cox regression indicated a hazard ratio (HR) 63% lower for Epoch 3 compared with 1, an HR 50% lower for the McDonald criteria combined, and an HR 65% lower for McDonald 2010 compared with Poser. Regarding the conversion to SPMS, the HR was 53% lower for Epoch 3, 48% lower for the McDonald criteria combined, and 64% lower for McDonald 2010. The multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that incomplete recovery of initial symptoms was the main prognostic factor for reaching EDSS 6.0. However, transitioning diagnostic criteria from Poser to McDonald 2001 and 2005 decreased these odds by 54%.Newer diagnostic criteria have reduced the likelihood of reaching EDSS 6.0 and converting to SPMS over the past 25 years.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

巴西多发性硬化症队列中改变诊断标准对残疾的影响。
近几十年来,多发性硬化症(MS)诊断标准的更新可能影响了残疾的进展。评估时间的推移和诊断标准的变化对残疾的影响。1994年至2019年巴西复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者的回顾性研究描述性分析比较了三个时期:第1时期(1994-2001)、第2时期(2002-2010)和第3时期(2011-2019)。扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS) 6.0和转化为继发性进展性多发性硬化症(SPMS)的结果进行Cox回归。我们按顺序比较了三个时代,Poser与所有麦当劳标准的组合,Poser与每个麦当劳标准的对比(2001年、2005年、2010年和2017年)。多变量logistic回归评估诊断标准对达到EDSS 6.0的患者的影响。诊断和治疗的时间在各个时期都有所减少。达到EDSS 6.0时,Cox回归表明,Epoch 3的风险比(HR)比1低63%,McDonald标准综合风险比(HR)比1低50%,McDonald 2010的风险比(HR)比Poser低65%。关于向SPMS的转换,Epoch 3的HR降低了53%,McDonald标准组合的HR降低了48%,McDonald 2010的HR降低了64%。多因素logistic回归分析显示,初始症状不完全恢复是EDSS达到6.0的主要预后因素。然而,2001年和2005年将诊断标准从Poser转换为McDonald,使这些几率降低了54%。在过去的25年里,更新的诊断标准降低了达到EDSS 6.0并转化为SPMS的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
262
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria is the official journal of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology. The mission of the journal is to provide neurologists, specialists and researchers in Neurology and related fields with open access to original articles (clinical and translational research), editorials, reviews, historical papers, neuroimages and letters about published manuscripts. It also publishes the consensus and guidelines on Neurology, as well as educational and scientific material from the different scientific departments of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology. The ultimate goals of the journal are to contribute to advance knowledge in the areas of Neurology and Neuroscience, and to provide valuable material for training and continuing education for neurologists and other health professionals working in the area. These goals might contribute to improving care for patients with neurological diseases. We aim to be the best Neuroscience journal in Latin America within the peer review system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信