Measurement accuracy and practicality of 15O-gas PET using a high-sensitivity whole-body PET/CT scanner

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Wataru Omasa, Keiichi Matsumoto, Keiji Shimizu, Nobuyuki Ohara, Masanori Goto, Kota Maekawa, Go Akamatsu, Yasuhiko Ikari, Michio Senda, Tomohiko Yamane
{"title":"Measurement accuracy and practicality of 15O-gas PET using a high-sensitivity whole-body PET/CT scanner","authors":"Wataru Omasa,&nbsp;Keiichi Matsumoto,&nbsp;Keiji Shimizu,&nbsp;Nobuyuki Ohara,&nbsp;Masanori Goto,&nbsp;Kota Maekawa,&nbsp;Go Akamatsu,&nbsp;Yasuhiko Ikari,&nbsp;Michio Senda,&nbsp;Tomohiko Yamane","doi":"10.1007/s12149-025-02073-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p><sup>15</sup>O-gas PET allows for the quantitative measurement of cerebral circulation and metabolism. However, the administration of high radioactivity doses raises concerns about count losses, particularly when using high-sensitivity whole-body PET/CT scanners equipped with BGO detectors. Therefore, optimizing the administration dose is crucial. This study aims to evaluate the validity of <sup>15</sup>O-gas PET performed with such scanners.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A 3D-PET/CT scanner, Discovery IQ, which has a 5-ring configuration with a 26 cm axial field of view, was used. A 100 mL saline pack containing <sup>11</sup>C at 460 MBq was placed on a 3D Hoffman brain phantom (HBP) filled with <sup>18</sup>F at 5.0 kBq/mL, and dynamic scans were performed. The quantitative capability of measured radioactivity in the HBP was evaluated. Subsequently, the HBP filled with <sup>18</sup>F at 5.0 kBq/mL was equipped with a gas mask system, and <sup>15</sup>O-gas was administered at flow rates ranging from 3000 MBq/min, decreasing in 500 MBq/min increments, while dynamic scans were performed. The quantitative accuracy of radioactivity in HBP and count rate characteristics were evaluated. To confirm the feasibility of the <sup>15</sup>O-gas PET method in the clinical situations both practically and quantitatively, cerebral blood-flow (CBF) values obtained via PET and SPECT were compared in 10 patients with cerebrovascular diseases. CBF was calculated by the autoradiography method. Analyses included standard brain transformation and alignment, followed by averaging CBF values from 26 brain regions for comparison.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The measured radioactivity in the HBP approached the true value as the radioactivity of <sup>11</sup>C in the saline pack decreased. To achieve a quantitative error within ± 5%, the radioactivity of <sup>11</sup>C needed to be below 40 MBq. Similarly, for <sup>15</sup>O-gas PET, an administration rate below 1000 MBq/min was needed to maintain quantitative accuracy within ± 5%. When exceeding 1500 MBq/min, random events surpassed 50%, compromising reliability. The correlation coefficient between PET and SPECT-derived CBF was 0.39 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). After excluding two outliers, it improved to 0.71 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), indicating a strong correlation. PET-measured CBF tended to be higher than SPECT.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These findings suggest that an administration rate of 800 MBq/min for <sup>15</sup>O-gas provides acceptable quantitative parameters for cerebral circulation and metabolism.</p><p>Clinical component of this study was registered at the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/) as # UMIN000046761.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8007,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Nuclear Medicine","volume":"39 10","pages":"1124 - 1134"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12149-025-02073-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

15O-gas PET allows for the quantitative measurement of cerebral circulation and metabolism. However, the administration of high radioactivity doses raises concerns about count losses, particularly when using high-sensitivity whole-body PET/CT scanners equipped with BGO detectors. Therefore, optimizing the administration dose is crucial. This study aims to evaluate the validity of 15O-gas PET performed with such scanners.

Methods

A 3D-PET/CT scanner, Discovery IQ, which has a 5-ring configuration with a 26 cm axial field of view, was used. A 100 mL saline pack containing 11C at 460 MBq was placed on a 3D Hoffman brain phantom (HBP) filled with 18F at 5.0 kBq/mL, and dynamic scans were performed. The quantitative capability of measured radioactivity in the HBP was evaluated. Subsequently, the HBP filled with 18F at 5.0 kBq/mL was equipped with a gas mask system, and 15O-gas was administered at flow rates ranging from 3000 MBq/min, decreasing in 500 MBq/min increments, while dynamic scans were performed. The quantitative accuracy of radioactivity in HBP and count rate characteristics were evaluated. To confirm the feasibility of the 15O-gas PET method in the clinical situations both practically and quantitatively, cerebral blood-flow (CBF) values obtained via PET and SPECT were compared in 10 patients with cerebrovascular diseases. CBF was calculated by the autoradiography method. Analyses included standard brain transformation and alignment, followed by averaging CBF values from 26 brain regions for comparison.

Results

The measured radioactivity in the HBP approached the true value as the radioactivity of 11C in the saline pack decreased. To achieve a quantitative error within ± 5%, the radioactivity of 11C needed to be below 40 MBq. Similarly, for 15O-gas PET, an administration rate below 1000 MBq/min was needed to maintain quantitative accuracy within ± 5%. When exceeding 1500 MBq/min, random events surpassed 50%, compromising reliability. The correlation coefficient between PET and SPECT-derived CBF was 0.39 (p < 0.001). After excluding two outliers, it improved to 0.71 (p < 0.001), indicating a strong correlation. PET-measured CBF tended to be higher than SPECT.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that an administration rate of 800 MBq/min for 15O-gas provides acceptable quantitative parameters for cerebral circulation and metabolism.

Clinical component of this study was registered at the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/) as # UMIN000046761.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用高灵敏度全身PET/CT扫描仪测量15o -气PET的精度和实用性。
目的:15o -气PET可以定量测量脑循环和代谢。然而,高放射性剂量的管理引起了对计数损失的担忧,特别是在使用配备BGO探测器的高灵敏度全身PET/CT扫描仪时。因此,优化给药剂量至关重要。本研究旨在评估用这种扫描仪进行的15O-gas PET的有效性。方法:采用Discovery IQ型5环轴向视野26 cm的3D-PET/CT扫描仪。将含11C (460 MBq)的100ml生理盐水包置于填充18F (5.0 kBq/mL)的3D Hoffman脑幻影(HBP)上,进行动态扫描。对HBP中放射性测量的定量能力进行了评价。随后,在HBP中填充5.0 kBq/mL的18F,并配备防毒面具系统,以3000 MBq/min的流速给药15o气体,以500 MBq/min的流速递减,同时进行动态扫描。评价了HBP中放射性的定量准确性和计数率特征。为了从实际和定量上证实15o气相PET方法在临床中的可行性,我们对10例脑血管疾病患者进行了PET和SPECT脑血流量(CBF)值的比较。采用放射自显影法计算脑血流。分析包括标准的脑转换和对齐,然后平均26个脑区域的CBF值进行比较。结果:随着生理盐水包中11C的放射性降低,HBP的放射性测量值逐渐接近真实值。为了实现±5%以内的定量误差,11C的放射性需要低于40 MBq。同样,对于15O-gas PET,需要低于1000 MBq/min的给药速率才能保持±5%的定量精度。当超过1500mbq /min时,随机事件超过50%,可靠性降低。PET与spect衍生CBF的相关系数为0.39 (p)。结论:这些结果表明,800 MBq/min的给药速率为15O-gas提供了可接受的脑循环和代谢定量参数。本研究的临床部分已在UMIN临床试验注册中心(www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/)注册为# UMIN000046761。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Nuclear Medicine
Annals of Nuclear Medicine 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
111
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Nuclear Medicine is an official journal of the Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine. It develops the appropriate application of radioactive substances and stable nuclides in the field of medicine. The journal promotes the exchange of ideas and information and research in nuclear medicine and includes the medical application of radionuclides and related subjects. It presents original articles, short communications, reviews and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信