Jingyu Li, Lei Pan, Qing Yun, Jinyu Xia, Linna Wang, Xiaodong Shen, Shaoli Chi, Hongxia Zou, Yanyan Zhao, Sufan Wu
{"title":"Validation of the Asian Midface Volume Deficit Severity Scale.","authors":"Jingyu Li, Lei Pan, Qing Yun, Jinyu Xia, Linna Wang, Xiaodong Shen, Shaoli Chi, Hongxia Zou, Yanyan Zhao, Sufan Wu","doi":"10.1007/s00266-025-04723-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anatomical differences in facial aging and aesthetic needs of Asian and Caucasian individuals have led to disparate clinical rejuvenation strategies using filler augmentation for midface volume deficits. Therefore, the Asian Midface Volume Deficit Severity Scale (AMVDSS) by LBTD (Lanzhou Biotechnique Development Co, Ltd) was developed to objectively assess midface volume deficits and clinical outcomes of Asian individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four observers independently rated randomized photographs (front, left and right 45°, left and right 90°) of 65 patients during two sessions with a 2-week interval using the AMVDSS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All participants were Asian (18 male and 47 female participants; mean age, 40.9 years; range, 20-76 years). Interobserver agreement was substantial to almost perfect for the left (weighted κ, 0.778-0.907) and right (weighted κ, 0.774-0.938) during the first session; it was almost perfect for the left (weighted κ, 0.844-0.907) and right (weighted κ, 0.805-0.876) during the second session. Interobserver agreement was 76.9% to 90.8% and 76.9% to 93.9% for the left and right, respectively, during the first session; it was 84.6% to 90.8% and 81.5% to 87.7% for the left and right, respectively, during the second session. Intraobserver agreement was \"almost perfect\" for both the left (weighted κ, 0.950; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.923-0.977) and right (weighted κ, 0.954; 95% CI 0.928-0.980). Exact intraobserver agreement was 95.0% (range, 90.8-100.0%) for the left; it was 95.4% (range, 94.9-96.9%) for the right.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AMVDSS by LBTD could be used to reliably assess midface volume deficits or volume changes after dermal filler injections.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence ii: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.</p>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-025-04723-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Anatomical differences in facial aging and aesthetic needs of Asian and Caucasian individuals have led to disparate clinical rejuvenation strategies using filler augmentation for midface volume deficits. Therefore, the Asian Midface Volume Deficit Severity Scale (AMVDSS) by LBTD (Lanzhou Biotechnique Development Co, Ltd) was developed to objectively assess midface volume deficits and clinical outcomes of Asian individuals.
Methods: Four observers independently rated randomized photographs (front, left and right 45°, left and right 90°) of 65 patients during two sessions with a 2-week interval using the AMVDSS.
Results: All participants were Asian (18 male and 47 female participants; mean age, 40.9 years; range, 20-76 years). Interobserver agreement was substantial to almost perfect for the left (weighted κ, 0.778-0.907) and right (weighted κ, 0.774-0.938) during the first session; it was almost perfect for the left (weighted κ, 0.844-0.907) and right (weighted κ, 0.805-0.876) during the second session. Interobserver agreement was 76.9% to 90.8% and 76.9% to 93.9% for the left and right, respectively, during the first session; it was 84.6% to 90.8% and 81.5% to 87.7% for the left and right, respectively, during the second session. Intraobserver agreement was "almost perfect" for both the left (weighted κ, 0.950; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.923-0.977) and right (weighted κ, 0.954; 95% CI 0.928-0.980). Exact intraobserver agreement was 95.0% (range, 90.8-100.0%) for the left; it was 95.4% (range, 94.9-96.9%) for the right.
Conclusions: The AMVDSS by LBTD could be used to reliably assess midface volume deficits or volume changes after dermal filler injections.
Level of evidence ii: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
期刊介绍:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP).
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships.
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.