Validation of the Asian Midface Volume Deficit Severity Scale.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Jingyu Li, Lei Pan, Qing Yun, Jinyu Xia, Linna Wang, Xiaodong Shen, Shaoli Chi, Hongxia Zou, Yanyan Zhao, Sufan Wu
{"title":"Validation of the Asian Midface Volume Deficit Severity Scale.","authors":"Jingyu Li, Lei Pan, Qing Yun, Jinyu Xia, Linna Wang, Xiaodong Shen, Shaoli Chi, Hongxia Zou, Yanyan Zhao, Sufan Wu","doi":"10.1007/s00266-025-04723-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anatomical differences in facial aging and aesthetic needs of Asian and Caucasian individuals have led to disparate clinical rejuvenation strategies using filler augmentation for midface volume deficits. Therefore, the Asian Midface Volume Deficit Severity Scale (AMVDSS) by LBTD (Lanzhou Biotechnique Development Co, Ltd) was developed to objectively assess midface volume deficits and clinical outcomes of Asian individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four observers independently rated randomized photographs (front, left and right 45°, left and right 90°) of 65 patients during two sessions with a 2-week interval using the AMVDSS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All participants were Asian (18 male and 47 female participants; mean age, 40.9 years; range, 20-76 years). Interobserver agreement was substantial to almost perfect for the left (weighted κ, 0.778-0.907) and right (weighted κ, 0.774-0.938) during the first session; it was almost perfect for the left (weighted κ, 0.844-0.907) and right (weighted κ, 0.805-0.876) during the second session. Interobserver agreement was 76.9% to 90.8% and 76.9% to 93.9% for the left and right, respectively, during the first session; it was 84.6% to 90.8% and 81.5% to 87.7% for the left and right, respectively, during the second session. Intraobserver agreement was \"almost perfect\" for both the left (weighted κ, 0.950; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.923-0.977) and right (weighted κ, 0.954; 95% CI 0.928-0.980). Exact intraobserver agreement was 95.0% (range, 90.8-100.0%) for the left; it was 95.4% (range, 94.9-96.9%) for the right.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AMVDSS by LBTD could be used to reliably assess midface volume deficits or volume changes after dermal filler injections.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence ii: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.</p>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-025-04723-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anatomical differences in facial aging and aesthetic needs of Asian and Caucasian individuals have led to disparate clinical rejuvenation strategies using filler augmentation for midface volume deficits. Therefore, the Asian Midface Volume Deficit Severity Scale (AMVDSS) by LBTD (Lanzhou Biotechnique Development Co, Ltd) was developed to objectively assess midface volume deficits and clinical outcomes of Asian individuals.

Methods: Four observers independently rated randomized photographs (front, left and right 45°, left and right 90°) of 65 patients during two sessions with a 2-week interval using the AMVDSS.

Results: All participants were Asian (18 male and 47 female participants; mean age, 40.9 years; range, 20-76 years). Interobserver agreement was substantial to almost perfect for the left (weighted κ, 0.778-0.907) and right (weighted κ, 0.774-0.938) during the first session; it was almost perfect for the left (weighted κ, 0.844-0.907) and right (weighted κ, 0.805-0.876) during the second session. Interobserver agreement was 76.9% to 90.8% and 76.9% to 93.9% for the left and right, respectively, during the first session; it was 84.6% to 90.8% and 81.5% to 87.7% for the left and right, respectively, during the second session. Intraobserver agreement was "almost perfect" for both the left (weighted κ, 0.950; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.923-0.977) and right (weighted κ, 0.954; 95% CI 0.928-0.980). Exact intraobserver agreement was 95.0% (range, 90.8-100.0%) for the left; it was 95.4% (range, 94.9-96.9%) for the right.

Conclusions: The AMVDSS by LBTD could be used to reliably assess midface volume deficits or volume changes after dermal filler injections.

Level of evidence ii: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

亚洲中面体积缺陷严重程度量表的验证。
背景:亚洲人和白种人在面部衰老和审美需求上的解剖差异导致了不同的临床年轻化策略,使用填充物增加中脸体积缺陷。因此,LBTD(兰州生物技术开发有限公司)开发了亚洲中脸体积缺陷严重程度量表(AMVDSS),以客观评估亚洲个体的中脸体积缺陷和临床结果。方法:使用AMVDSS, 4名观察员独立评价65例患者的随机照片(前后45°,左右90°,左右90°),每隔2周进行两次治疗。结果:所有参与者均为亚洲人(男性18人,女性47人;平均年龄40.9岁;范围:20-76年)。在第一次会议期间,观察者之间的一致性基本达到几乎完美的左(加权κ, 0.778-0.907)和右(加权κ, 0.774-0.938);在第二次会话中,左侧(加权κ, 0.844-0.907)和右侧(加权κ, 0.805-0.876)几乎是完美的。第一届会议期间,左派和右派的观察员间共识率分别为76.9%对90.8%和76.9%对93.9%;在第二次会议中,左派和右派的支持率分别为84.6% ~ 90.8%和81.5% ~ 87.7%。观察者内部的一致是“几乎完美”的左侧(加权κ, 0.950;95%置信区间[CI] 0.923-0.977)和右(加权κ, 0.954;95% ci 0.928-0.980)。左侧的准确观察者一致性为95.0%(范围,90.8-100.0%);正确答案为95.4%(范围94.9-96.9%)。结论:基于LBTD的AMVDSS可以可靠地评估真皮填充剂注射后的中脸体积缺损或体积变化。证据等级ii:本刊要求作者为每篇文章指定证据等级。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者说明www.springer.com/00266。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
479
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP). Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信