Emoji Are Not All Created Equal: The Effects of Emoji Variations on Brand Attitudes, Product Quality Expectations and Trial Intentions

IF 7.6 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Qi Deng, Lindsay McShane
{"title":"Emoji Are Not All Created Equal: The Effects of Emoji Variations on Brand Attitudes, Product Quality Expectations and Trial Intentions","authors":"Qi Deng,&nbsp;Lindsay McShane","doi":"10.1111/ijcs.70088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Contributing to a burgeoning area of research on the nuanced effects of emojis in brand communications, the current research builds understanding of two dominant forms of emoji role—emojis as text reinforcement and emojis as text substitution—and their downstream effects. Across three studies, we examine how emoji roles differentially interact with message features to influence brand-level outcomes (brand attitudes, product quality expectations and consumers' willingness to try a brand's product) through their effects on processing fluency. We find robust evidence that substitution emojis elicit more negative brand-level outcomes than reinforcement emojis both when the emoji has low congruence with the text and when the complexity of the text in the message is high, and that these effects are mediated by processing fluency. These findings deepen our understanding of emojis' effects in brand communications and provide practical guidance for digital marketers regarding how to effectively leverage emojis.</p>","PeriodicalId":48192,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Consumer Studies","volume":"49 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijcs.70088","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Consumer Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijcs.70088","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Contributing to a burgeoning area of research on the nuanced effects of emojis in brand communications, the current research builds understanding of two dominant forms of emoji role—emojis as text reinforcement and emojis as text substitution—and their downstream effects. Across three studies, we examine how emoji roles differentially interact with message features to influence brand-level outcomes (brand attitudes, product quality expectations and consumers' willingness to try a brand's product) through their effects on processing fluency. We find robust evidence that substitution emojis elicit more negative brand-level outcomes than reinforcement emojis both when the emoji has low congruence with the text and when the complexity of the text in the message is high, and that these effects are mediated by processing fluency. These findings deepen our understanding of emojis' effects in brand communications and provide practical guidance for digital marketers regarding how to effectively leverage emojis.

Abstract Image

表情符号并不都是平等的:表情符号变化对品牌态度、产品质量期望和试用意图的影响
对于表情符号在品牌传播中的微妙影响的研究正在蓬勃发展,目前的研究建立了对表情符号的两种主要形式——作为文本强化的表情符号和作为文本替代的表情符号——及其下游效应的理解。在三项研究中,我们研究了表情符号角色如何通过对处理流畅性的影响,与信息特征进行不同的互动,从而影响品牌层面的结果(品牌态度、产品质量期望和消费者尝试品牌产品的意愿)。我们发现强有力的证据表明,当表情符号与文本的一致性较低以及信息中文本的复杂性较高时,替代表情符号比强化表情符号会引发更多的负面品牌水平结果,并且这些影响是由处理流畅性介导的。这些发现加深了我们对表情符号在品牌传播中的作用的理解,并为数字营销人员提供了如何有效利用表情符号的实用指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
23.20%
发文量
119
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Consumer Studies is a scholarly platform for consumer research, welcoming academic and research papers across all realms of consumer studies. Our publication showcases articles of global interest, presenting cutting-edge research from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信