{"title":"Effect of Human Disturbance on Feeding Behavior and Activity Time Budget of Lesser Adjutant Stork Leptoptilos javanicus (Horsfield, 1821) in Nepal","authors":"Santosh Bajagain, Jhamak Bahadur Karki, Yajna Prasad Timilsina, Menuka Maharjan, Aavas Pradhan, Nabaraj Pudasaini, Prashant Rokka, Surendra Maharjan","doi":"10.1002/ece3.71643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding how animals allocate their time among essential behaviors such as foraging, self-maintenance, and reproduction is critical for effective conservation, especially in human-modified landscapes. The study investigated how Lesser Adjutant Storks (<i>Leptoptilos javanicus</i>) adjust their behavior in response to human disturbance in the Janakinagar-Murtiya Important Bird and Biodiversity Area of Nepal. Using the Focal Animal Sampling method, we captured 600 min of video footage along road transects during the summer of 2023 and winter of 2024. The analysis revealed significant seasonal shifts. During the summer, vigilance dominated the activity budget (47.18%), while feeding was comparatively low (15.06%). In contrast, during winter, storks prioritized feeding (30.33%) over vigilance (23.32%). Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn's post hoc tests confirmed that both feeding and vigilance varied significantly across seasons (<i>p</i> < 0.05), suggesting that species adjust their time budgets based on resource availability and predation risk. Moreover, multinomial regression analysis indicated that human disturbance significantly influenced vigilance, with storks in high disturbance areas displaying greater vigilance than those in low disturbance areas (<i>p</i> < 0.05). These findings were further supported by a Likelihood Ratio Test (LRT = 263.82, df = 6, <i>p</i> < 0.05), confirming that disturbance level had a significant effect on behavioral variation. Collectively, the study suggests that vigilance behavior increases in both frequency and intensity under higher disturbance, potentially at the cost of feeding time and energy intake. This underscores the importance of minimizing human disturbance and conserving critical foraging habitats to support the long-term survival of the Lesser Adjutant Stork population in increasingly human-dominated landscapes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11467,"journal":{"name":"Ecology and Evolution","volume":"15 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ece3.71643","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.71643","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Understanding how animals allocate their time among essential behaviors such as foraging, self-maintenance, and reproduction is critical for effective conservation, especially in human-modified landscapes. The study investigated how Lesser Adjutant Storks (Leptoptilos javanicus) adjust their behavior in response to human disturbance in the Janakinagar-Murtiya Important Bird and Biodiversity Area of Nepal. Using the Focal Animal Sampling method, we captured 600 min of video footage along road transects during the summer of 2023 and winter of 2024. The analysis revealed significant seasonal shifts. During the summer, vigilance dominated the activity budget (47.18%), while feeding was comparatively low (15.06%). In contrast, during winter, storks prioritized feeding (30.33%) over vigilance (23.32%). Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn's post hoc tests confirmed that both feeding and vigilance varied significantly across seasons (p < 0.05), suggesting that species adjust their time budgets based on resource availability and predation risk. Moreover, multinomial regression analysis indicated that human disturbance significantly influenced vigilance, with storks in high disturbance areas displaying greater vigilance than those in low disturbance areas (p < 0.05). These findings were further supported by a Likelihood Ratio Test (LRT = 263.82, df = 6, p < 0.05), confirming that disturbance level had a significant effect on behavioral variation. Collectively, the study suggests that vigilance behavior increases in both frequency and intensity under higher disturbance, potentially at the cost of feeding time and energy intake. This underscores the importance of minimizing human disturbance and conserving critical foraging habitats to support the long-term survival of the Lesser Adjutant Stork population in increasingly human-dominated landscapes.
期刊介绍:
Ecology and Evolution is the peer reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of research in all areas of ecology, evolution and conservation science. The journal gives priority to quality research reports, theoretical or empirical, that develop our understanding of organisms and their diversity, interactions between them, and the natural environment.
Ecology and Evolution gives prompt and equal consideration to papers reporting theoretical, experimental, applied and descriptive work in terrestrial and aquatic environments. The journal will consider submissions across taxa in areas including but not limited to micro and macro ecological and evolutionary processes, characteristics of and interactions between individuals, populations, communities and the environment, physiological responses to environmental change, population genetics and phylogenetics, relatedness and kin selection, life histories, systematics and taxonomy, conservation genetics, extinction, speciation, adaption, behaviour, biodiversity, species abundance, macroecology, population and ecosystem dynamics, and conservation policy.