How much additive mortality is needed to suppress an outbreak?—A neglected question in forest insect pest management

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Rob C. Johns, S. Edwards, D. T. Quiring, G. Moreau, M. Stastny
{"title":"How much additive mortality is needed to suppress an outbreak?—A neglected question in forest insect pest management","authors":"Rob C. Johns,&nbsp;S. Edwards,&nbsp;D. T. Quiring,&nbsp;G. Moreau,&nbsp;M. Stastny","doi":"10.1111/aab.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The concepts of compensation and additive mortality form the ecological basis for understanding animal population responses to exploitation by humans. In the context of pest management, compensation is a density-dependent response that allows populations to offset control-related mortality, often via increased survival or reinvasion. Additive mortality, in contrast, accrues when a population's compensatory capacity is insufficient to offset losses, resulting in a net reduction in population size or growth rate. These concepts are rarely considered in forest insect pest management, which tends to emphasise short-term plant protection over long-term population control. We used published life table data for a major native forest insect defoliator, the spruce budworm (<i>Choristoneura fumiferana</i> [Lepidoptera: Tortricidae]) to simulate the amount of additive mortality required to suppress an outbreak. Simulations also assessed how the failure to account for different compensatory responses could hinder successful control. Our results suggest that only relatively modest amounts of additive mortality (perhaps as low as approximately 8%–18%) may be needed to stop spruce budworm from outbreaking, with immigration being the strongest potential compensatory hindrance to outbreak suppression. Many of the compensatory responses that thwarted outbreak suppression in the past (e.g., low detection efficiency, immigration, indiscriminate killing of predators and parasitoids) have contemporary solutions that could increase additive mortality and thereby enhance the feasibility of population control strategies for native forest insect pests. Our results suggest that some native forest insect pests may require relatively little additive mortality to suppress outbreaks if compensation-limiting strategies are used. Incorporating theoretical and strategic frameworks used in vertebrate population management could advance the development of native insect population control programmes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7977,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Applied Biology","volume":"187 1","pages":"111-120"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aab.70003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Applied Biology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aab.70003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concepts of compensation and additive mortality form the ecological basis for understanding animal population responses to exploitation by humans. In the context of pest management, compensation is a density-dependent response that allows populations to offset control-related mortality, often via increased survival or reinvasion. Additive mortality, in contrast, accrues when a population's compensatory capacity is insufficient to offset losses, resulting in a net reduction in population size or growth rate. These concepts are rarely considered in forest insect pest management, which tends to emphasise short-term plant protection over long-term population control. We used published life table data for a major native forest insect defoliator, the spruce budworm (Choristoneura fumiferana [Lepidoptera: Tortricidae]) to simulate the amount of additive mortality required to suppress an outbreak. Simulations also assessed how the failure to account for different compensatory responses could hinder successful control. Our results suggest that only relatively modest amounts of additive mortality (perhaps as low as approximately 8%–18%) may be needed to stop spruce budworm from outbreaking, with immigration being the strongest potential compensatory hindrance to outbreak suppression. Many of the compensatory responses that thwarted outbreak suppression in the past (e.g., low detection efficiency, immigration, indiscriminate killing of predators and parasitoids) have contemporary solutions that could increase additive mortality and thereby enhance the feasibility of population control strategies for native forest insect pests. Our results suggest that some native forest insect pests may require relatively little additive mortality to suppress outbreaks if compensation-limiting strategies are used. Incorporating theoretical and strategic frameworks used in vertebrate population management could advance the development of native insect population control programmes.

Abstract Image

需要多少附加死亡率才能抑制疫情?——森林病虫害治理中被忽视的问题
补偿和累加性死亡的概念构成了理解动物种群对人类开发反应的生态学基础。在有害生物管理方面,补偿是一种依赖于密度的反应,使种群能够抵消与控制有关的死亡率,通常是通过增加生存或再次入侵。相反,当人口的补偿能力不足以抵消损失时,就会产生累加性死亡率,导致人口规模或增长率的净减少。在森林虫害管理中很少考虑到这些概念,这种管理往往强调短期的植物保护,而不是长期的人口控制。我们使用一种主要的原生森林昆虫,云杉budworm (Choristoneura fumiferana[鳞翅目:蛾科])的公开生命表数据来模拟抑制暴发所需的附加死亡率。模拟还评估了未能解释不同的补偿反应如何阻碍成功的控制。我们的研究结果表明,可能只需要相对适度的附加死亡率(可能低至约8%-18%)就可以阻止云杉budworm的爆发,而移民是抑制爆发的最大潜在补偿性障碍。过去阻碍了疫情抑制的许多补偿性应对措施(例如,检测效率低、移民、不分皂白地杀死捕食者和拟寄生虫)有了现代解决办法,可以增加累加性死亡率,从而提高原生森林害虫种群控制战略的可行性。我们的研究结果表明,如果使用补偿限制策略,一些原生森林害虫可能需要相对较少的附加死亡率来抑制爆发。结合脊椎动物种群管理中使用的理论和战略框架可以促进本地昆虫种群控制规划的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Applied Biology
Annals of Applied Biology 生物-农业综合
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Applied Biology is an international journal sponsored by the Association of Applied Biologists. The journal publishes original research papers on all aspects of applied research on crop production, crop protection and the cropping ecosystem. The journal is published both online and in six printed issues per year. Annals papers must contribute substantially to the advancement of knowledge and may, among others, encompass the scientific disciplines of: Agronomy Agrometeorology Agrienvironmental sciences Applied genomics Applied metabolomics Applied proteomics Biodiversity Biological control Climate change Crop ecology Entomology Genetic manipulation Molecular biology Mycology Nematology Pests Plant pathology Plant breeding & genetics Plant physiology Post harvest biology Soil science Statistics Virology Weed biology Annals also welcomes reviews of interest in these subject areas. Reviews should be critical surveys of the field and offer new insights. All papers are subject to peer review. Papers must usually contribute substantially to the advancement of knowledge in applied biology but short papers discussing techniques or substantiated results, and reviews of current knowledge of interest to applied biologists will be considered for publication. Papers or reviews must not be offered to any other journal for prior or simultaneous publication and normally average seven printed pages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信