Multidimensional Performance Assessments in U15 Female Soccer: The Predictive Validity for Different Selection Levels in U17 and Success in Adulthood

IF 3
Daniel Leyhr, Fynn Bergmann, Johannes Raabe, Oliver Höner
{"title":"Multidimensional Performance Assessments in U15 Female Soccer: The Predictive Validity for Different Selection Levels in U17 and Success in Adulthood","authors":"Daniel Leyhr,&nbsp;Fynn Bergmann,&nbsp;Johannes Raabe,&nbsp;Oliver Höner","doi":"10.1002/ejsc.12335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Female players have largely been neglected in soccer-specific talent research. Particularly, prospective studies examining the predictive validity of multidimensional performance factors for different selection levels—especially players' success in adulthood—remain scarce. This prospective cohort study investigated the predictive validity of multidimensional performance factors for the future success of U15 female players (<i>N</i> = 264) participating in the German Football Association's Talent Development program. All players' kicking, tactical, and psychosocial skills, as well as endurance capacity, were evaluated subjectively. They also completed five objective motor tests (sprint, agility [CODS], dribbling, ball control, and juggling). Players' future success was based on their selection for the U17 Bundesliga (43.6% selection rate), U17 Youth National Team (6.4%), and Women's Bundesliga (i.e., professional level in adulthood; 6.1%). Univariate analyses examined performance differences in each predictor between selected and nonselected players. Multivariate analyses determined whether objective predictors, subjective predictors, or a combination thereof offered the best prediction. Univariate results indicate the predictive validity of both assessments, revealing a trend toward larger effect sizes for higher selection levels and differences in predictor relevance. Multivariate models showed that adding subjective to objective predictors led to an increase in explained variance for participation in the U17 Bundesliga (Nagelkerke's <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 16%) and Women's Bundesliga (31%), but not U17 Youth National Team (18%). Sprint performance reached significance across models, whereas the sole significant subjective predictor was tactical skills regarding participation in the Women's Bundesliga. Overall, these findings support the practical value of both assessments, which can likely be increased further via more distinct coach ratings.</p>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":"25 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.12335","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.12335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Female players have largely been neglected in soccer-specific talent research. Particularly, prospective studies examining the predictive validity of multidimensional performance factors for different selection levels—especially players' success in adulthood—remain scarce. This prospective cohort study investigated the predictive validity of multidimensional performance factors for the future success of U15 female players (N = 264) participating in the German Football Association's Talent Development program. All players' kicking, tactical, and psychosocial skills, as well as endurance capacity, were evaluated subjectively. They also completed five objective motor tests (sprint, agility [CODS], dribbling, ball control, and juggling). Players' future success was based on their selection for the U17 Bundesliga (43.6% selection rate), U17 Youth National Team (6.4%), and Women's Bundesliga (i.e., professional level in adulthood; 6.1%). Univariate analyses examined performance differences in each predictor between selected and nonselected players. Multivariate analyses determined whether objective predictors, subjective predictors, or a combination thereof offered the best prediction. Univariate results indicate the predictive validity of both assessments, revealing a trend toward larger effect sizes for higher selection levels and differences in predictor relevance. Multivariate models showed that adding subjective to objective predictors led to an increase in explained variance for participation in the U17 Bundesliga (Nagelkerke's R2 = 16%) and Women's Bundesliga (31%), but not U17 Youth National Team (18%). Sprint performance reached significance across models, whereas the sole significant subjective predictor was tactical skills regarding participation in the Women's Bundesliga. Overall, these findings support the practical value of both assessments, which can likely be increased further via more distinct coach ratings.

Abstract Image

U15女子足球多维表现评价:U17不同选择水平与成年期成功的预测效度
在足球人才研究中,女性球员在很大程度上被忽视了。特别是,对不同选择水平的多维表现因素的预测有效性的前瞻性研究,特别是球员在成年期的成功,仍然很少。本前瞻性队列研究调查了多维表现因素对参加德国足协人才发展计划的U15女球员(N = 264)未来成功的预测效度。所有运动员的踢球、战术、心理技能以及耐力都进行了主观评估。他们还完成了五项客观运动测试(冲刺、敏捷、运球、控球和杂耍)。球员未来的成功取决于他们入选U17德甲(43.6%的入选率)、U17青年国家队(6.4%)和女足德甲(即成年后的职业水平;6.1%)。单变量分析检验了入选球员和非入选球员在每个预测指标上的表现差异。多变量分析确定了客观预测因素、主观预测因素或两者的组合是否提供了最佳预测。单变量结果表明两种评估的预测有效性,揭示了更高选择水平和预测相关性差异的更大效应大小的趋势。多变量模型显示,将主观预测因素加入到客观预测因素中,导致U17德甲(Nagelkerke的R2 = 16%)和女足德甲(31%)的解释方差增加,但U17青年国家队(18%)的解释方差没有增加。短跑成绩在所有模型中都具有显著性,而唯一显著的主观预测因素是参加女足德甲的战术技能。总的来说,这些发现支持了这两种评估的实际价值,这种价值可能会通过更明确的教练评级进一步增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信