Investigation and Analysis of the Acceptance of the License Plate–Based Restriction Policy: A Case Study in Hangzhou, China

IF 2 4区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Yexing Yin, Gang Yu, Rongchuan Lin, Sheng Jin, Cheng Xu
{"title":"Investigation and Analysis of the Acceptance of the License Plate–Based Restriction Policy: A Case Study in Hangzhou, China","authors":"Yexing Yin,&nbsp;Gang Yu,&nbsp;Rongchuan Lin,&nbsp;Sheng Jin,&nbsp;Cheng Xu","doi":"10.1155/atr/5512705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>In order to better understand the factors that affect Hangzhou residents’ acceptance of the license plate–based restriction (LPR) policy, new factors such as fairness, family life cycle factors, and preacceptance of alternative measures were added to explore new interactions between different factors. A questionnaire survey was completed among 958 residents of Hangzhou City, and a partial least squares structural equation model (PLS-SEM) was established to analyze the factors that affect the acceptance of the LPR policy. An analysis of socioeconomic attributes is conducted to explore the impact of education, age, and family life cycle factors on the acceptance of the LPR policy. The results indicate that perceived cost-effectiveness, social norms, policy cognition, fairness, important goals, and preacceptance of alternative measures have significant direct effects on the postacceptance of the LPR policy, while fairness and important goals have indirect effects through social norms. Regarding postacceptance, perceived effectiveness can only indirectly affect postacceptance of the LPR policy through policy cognition and perceived cost-effectiveness. Responsibility attribution can only indirectly affect postacceptance through important goals. As the education level and age increase, residents’ acceptance of the LPR policy will decrease; young families without children and families with minor children have lower acceptance of the LPR policy than families with all adult members and elder families without children.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Transportation","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/atr/5512705","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/atr/5512705","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In order to better understand the factors that affect Hangzhou residents’ acceptance of the license plate–based restriction (LPR) policy, new factors such as fairness, family life cycle factors, and preacceptance of alternative measures were added to explore new interactions between different factors. A questionnaire survey was completed among 958 residents of Hangzhou City, and a partial least squares structural equation model (PLS-SEM) was established to analyze the factors that affect the acceptance of the LPR policy. An analysis of socioeconomic attributes is conducted to explore the impact of education, age, and family life cycle factors on the acceptance of the LPR policy. The results indicate that perceived cost-effectiveness, social norms, policy cognition, fairness, important goals, and preacceptance of alternative measures have significant direct effects on the postacceptance of the LPR policy, while fairness and important goals have indirect effects through social norms. Regarding postacceptance, perceived effectiveness can only indirectly affect postacceptance of the LPR policy through policy cognition and perceived cost-effectiveness. Responsibility attribution can only indirectly affect postacceptance through important goals. As the education level and age increase, residents’ acceptance of the LPR policy will decrease; young families without children and families with minor children have lower acceptance of the LPR policy than families with all adult members and elder families without children.

Abstract Image

基于牌照的限行政策接受度调查与分析——以杭州市为例
为了更好地了解影响杭州市居民对车牌限行政策接受度的因素,本研究增加了公平性、家庭生命周期因素和替代措施预接受度等新因素,探索不同因素之间新的相互作用。通过对杭州市958名居民进行问卷调查,建立偏最小二乘结构方程模型(PLS-SEM),分析影响LPR政策接受度的因素。通过社会经济属性分析,探讨教育、年龄和家庭生命周期因素对LPR政策接受度的影响。结果表明,感知成本效益、社会规范、政策认知、公平性、重要目标和替代措施的预接受对LPR政策的后接受有显著的直接影响,而公平性和重要目标通过社会规范对LPR政策的后接受有间接影响。对于后接受,感知有效性只能通过政策认知和感知成本效益间接影响LPR政策的后接受。责任归因只能通过重要目标间接影响后接受。随着受教育程度和年龄的增加,居民对LPR政策的接受程度会降低;没有子女的年轻家庭和有未成年子女的家庭对LPR政策的接受度低于有全部成年成员的家庭和没有子女的老年家庭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Transportation
Journal of Advanced Transportation 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
8.70%
发文量
466
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Transportation (JAT) is a fully peer reviewed international journal in transportation research areas related to public transit, road traffic, transport networks and air transport. It publishes theoretical and innovative papers on analysis, design, operations, optimization and planning of multi-modal transport networks, transit & traffic systems, transport technology and traffic safety. Urban rail and bus systems, Pedestrian studies, traffic flow theory and control, Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) and automated and/or connected vehicles are some topics of interest. Highway engineering, railway engineering and logistics do not fall within the aims and scope of JAT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信