Principal Components for Practice-Oriented Measurement of Running Technique: A Proof-Of-Concept Study

IF 3
Daniel Debertin, Julia Kiebacher, Martin Zhang, Peter Federolf
{"title":"Principal Components for Practice-Oriented Measurement of Running Technique: A Proof-Of-Concept Study","authors":"Daniel Debertin,&nbsp;Julia Kiebacher,&nbsp;Martin Zhang,&nbsp;Peter Federolf","doi":"10.1002/ejsc.70004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aims to construct valid and practically applicable running technique measures using principal component analysis (PCA). We hypothesized that data-driven principal movements (PMs), derived from deliberately instructed opposite technique variations, would significantly distinguish these variations and could serve as quantitative measures of running technique as described by practitioners. 20 experienced runners were instructed to vary 14 distinct running technique elements into two opposing directions (e.g., forward and backward lean for a technique element representing horizontal movements). Elements and their variations were selected based on visual descriptions from practitioners found in running literature. Kinematic data were collected on a treadmill using optical motion capture and analyzed using a PCA-based approach to determine running-specific technique measures per technique element. By combining trials with opposing technique variations, variance in the data was purposefully produced, which in turn caused the resultant principal movements to align with the intended technique element. For all of the 14 technique elements, a valid measure—in the sense that the inputted opposite variations were significantly distinguishable within this measure—could be constructed. The measures could further be applied to the habitual running technique of the group of tested runners. The results of this study demonstrate the construct validity and applicability of the presented approach to measure running technique. This method can provide runners and coaches with valuable feedback and will enable future studies to investigate running technique, quantified through practice-informed measures, in the context of performance, injury risk, or adaptations to equipment.</p>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":"25 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.70004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.70004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to construct valid and practically applicable running technique measures using principal component analysis (PCA). We hypothesized that data-driven principal movements (PMs), derived from deliberately instructed opposite technique variations, would significantly distinguish these variations and could serve as quantitative measures of running technique as described by practitioners. 20 experienced runners were instructed to vary 14 distinct running technique elements into two opposing directions (e.g., forward and backward lean for a technique element representing horizontal movements). Elements and their variations were selected based on visual descriptions from practitioners found in running literature. Kinematic data were collected on a treadmill using optical motion capture and analyzed using a PCA-based approach to determine running-specific technique measures per technique element. By combining trials with opposing technique variations, variance in the data was purposefully produced, which in turn caused the resultant principal movements to align with the intended technique element. For all of the 14 technique elements, a valid measure—in the sense that the inputted opposite variations were significantly distinguishable within this measure—could be constructed. The measures could further be applied to the habitual running technique of the group of tested runners. The results of this study demonstrate the construct validity and applicability of the presented approach to measure running technique. This method can provide runners and coaches with valuable feedback and will enable future studies to investigate running technique, quantified through practice-informed measures, in the context of performance, injury risk, or adaptations to equipment.

Abstract Image

面向实践的跑步技术测量的主成分:概念验证研究
本研究旨在运用主成分分析法(PCA)建构有效且实用的跑步技术措施。我们假设数据驱动的主要动作(pm),来自于刻意指导的相反的技术变化,可以显著地区分这些变化,并且可以作为从业者所描述的跑步技术的定量测量。20名有经验的跑步者被指示将14种不同的跑步技术元素转变成两个相反的方向(例如,向前和向后倾斜代表水平运动的技术元素)。元素和它们的变化是根据跑步文献中发现的实践者的视觉描述来选择的。使用光学运动捕捉技术在跑步机上收集运动数据,并使用基于pca的方法进行分析,以确定每个技术元素的跑步特定技术措施。通过将试验与相反的技术变化相结合,有目的地产生了数据的差异,这反过来又导致了最终的主要动作与预期的技术元素一致。对于所有的14个技术元素,可以构建一个有效的测量-在这个测量中输入的相反变化是显著可区分的。这些措施可以进一步应用于被试跑步者的习惯性跑步技术。研究结果验证了该方法在测量运行技术中的结构有效性和适用性。这种方法可以为跑步者和教练提供有价值的反馈,并将使未来的研究能够调查跑步技术,通过实践信息测量,在表现,受伤风险或设备适应性的背景下进行量化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信