Arshdeep Singh, Daran Rudnick, Daniel D. Snow, Swetabh Patel, Christopher Misar, Christopher Proctor, Laila Puntel, Javed Iqbal
{"title":"Coupling effects of enhanced efficiency fertilizers and nitrogen timing on groundwater quality and maize yield in northeast Nebraska","authors":"Arshdeep Singh, Daran Rudnick, Daniel D. Snow, Swetabh Patel, Christopher Misar, Christopher Proctor, Laila Puntel, Javed Iqbal","doi":"10.1002/saj2.70090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Increasing groundwater nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub>-N) contamination in Nebraska's Bazile Groundwater Management Area poses significant economic, environmental, and public health risks. This 2-year (2021–2022) on-farm study evaluated the effects of nitrogen (N) application timing (preplant vs. split) and source (with and without enhanced efficiency fertilizers [EEFs], including urease inhibitor [UI] and dual inhibitor [DI] combining urease and nitrification inhibitor) on NO<sub>3</sub>-N leaching, maize yield, and return to N with environmental cost (RTN<sub>Env</sub>) in irrigated sandy soils. Six N treatments at 202 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> were compared to a zero-N control: preplant urea, conventional split urea-UAN (urea ammonium nitrate), preplant UI, split UI-UAN, preplant DI, and split DI-UAN. Porous suction cup lysimeters were installed at a depth of 120 cm to collect pore-water samples within the growing seasons. Compared to conventional split urea-UAN, preplant EEFs (preplant UI and preplant DI) reduced nitrate leaching by 75% and increased RTN<sub>Env</sub> by $537 ha<sup>−1</sup> without significantly affecting maize yield. Split EEFs (split UI-UAN and split DI-UAN) reduced NO<sub>3</sub>-N leaching by 31% and increased grain yield by 9.6% compared to preplant Urea in 2021. However, the split EEFs increased NO<sub>3</sub>-N leaching by 139% compared to the preplant EEF treatments, with no corresponding yield improvement. These findings suggest that preplant application of EEFs can substantially reduce NO<sub>3</sub>-N leaching without compromising maize yield while offering greater economic returns in areas affected by groundwater contamination.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"89 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.70090","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.70090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Increasing groundwater nitrate (NO3-N) contamination in Nebraska's Bazile Groundwater Management Area poses significant economic, environmental, and public health risks. This 2-year (2021–2022) on-farm study evaluated the effects of nitrogen (N) application timing (preplant vs. split) and source (with and without enhanced efficiency fertilizers [EEFs], including urease inhibitor [UI] and dual inhibitor [DI] combining urease and nitrification inhibitor) on NO3-N leaching, maize yield, and return to N with environmental cost (RTNEnv) in irrigated sandy soils. Six N treatments at 202 kg N ha−1 were compared to a zero-N control: preplant urea, conventional split urea-UAN (urea ammonium nitrate), preplant UI, split UI-UAN, preplant DI, and split DI-UAN. Porous suction cup lysimeters were installed at a depth of 120 cm to collect pore-water samples within the growing seasons. Compared to conventional split urea-UAN, preplant EEFs (preplant UI and preplant DI) reduced nitrate leaching by 75% and increased RTNEnv by $537 ha−1 without significantly affecting maize yield. Split EEFs (split UI-UAN and split DI-UAN) reduced NO3-N leaching by 31% and increased grain yield by 9.6% compared to preplant Urea in 2021. However, the split EEFs increased NO3-N leaching by 139% compared to the preplant EEF treatments, with no corresponding yield improvement. These findings suggest that preplant application of EEFs can substantially reduce NO3-N leaching without compromising maize yield while offering greater economic returns in areas affected by groundwater contamination.
内布拉斯加州巴齐勒地下水管理区不断增加的地下水硝酸盐(NO3-N)污染构成了重大的经济、环境和公共健康风险。这项为期2年(2021-2022)的农场研究评估了施氮时机(种植前vs分种)和施氮源(使用和不使用高效肥料[EEFs],包括脲酶抑制剂[UI]和脲酶与硝化抑制剂组合的双重抑制剂[DI])对灌溉沙质土壤NO3-N淋溶、玉米产量和环境成本(RTNEnv)的影响。与零氮对照相比,202 kg N ha - 1的6个氮肥处理分别为:预施尿素、常规的硝酸铵尿素- uan、预施UI、预施UI- uan、预施DI和预施DI- uan。在120 cm深度处安装多孔吸盘溶水仪,收集生长季节的孔隙水样本。与传统的分离尿素- uan相比,种植前EEFs(种植前UI和种植前DI)减少了75%的硝酸盐淋溶,增加了537公顷- 1的RTNEnv,而没有显著影响玉米产量。2021年,与种植前尿素相比,分离式EEFs(分离式UI-UAN和分离式DI-UAN)减少了31%的NO3-N淋溶,提高了9.6%的粮食产量。然而,与种植前相比,分离式EEF处理使NO3-N浸出率提高了139%,但没有相应的产量提高。这些发现表明,在受地下水污染影响的地区,种植前施用EEFs可以在不影响玉米产量的情况下显著减少NO3-N淋失,同时提供更高的经济回报。