{"title":"A qualitative investigation of how stutterers perceive social interactions","authors":"Courtney Luckman, Eric S. Jackson","doi":"10.1016/j.jfludis.2025.106137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to examine the social perceptions that stutterers hold about their communication partners with the goal of understanding why some situations are more challenging for stutterers than others.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Fifteen adults who stutter were interviewed for one hour each to explore their perceptions and evaluations of their listeners. The interviews were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants expressed uncertainty about how their listeners would respond to their stuttering. Many reported feeling more discomfort when stuttering around unfamiliar communication partners due to concerns about making a negative first impression. All participants felt judged due to their stuttering, and many experienced pressure to be fluent. Meta-perceptions of communication partners played a crucial role in determining how difficult the social interaction was perceived to be.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study highlights the challenges adults who stutter may face in social situations, revealing the nuanced complexities of stuttering within social interactions. It highlights the significant impact of listener behavior and stutterers’ meta-perceptions on stuttering events. These findings provide a rich analysis of how stutterers interpret social interactions and can form the basis of quantitative investigations into how social perceptions are related to stuttering events.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fluency Disorders","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 106137"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fluency Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094730X25000397","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to examine the social perceptions that stutterers hold about their communication partners with the goal of understanding why some situations are more challenging for stutterers than others.
Method
Fifteen adults who stutter were interviewed for one hour each to explore their perceptions and evaluations of their listeners. The interviews were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.
Results
Participants expressed uncertainty about how their listeners would respond to their stuttering. Many reported feeling more discomfort when stuttering around unfamiliar communication partners due to concerns about making a negative first impression. All participants felt judged due to their stuttering, and many experienced pressure to be fluent. Meta-perceptions of communication partners played a crucial role in determining how difficult the social interaction was perceived to be.
Conclusions
This study highlights the challenges adults who stutter may face in social situations, revealing the nuanced complexities of stuttering within social interactions. It highlights the significant impact of listener behavior and stutterers’ meta-perceptions on stuttering events. These findings provide a rich analysis of how stutterers interpret social interactions and can form the basis of quantitative investigations into how social perceptions are related to stuttering events.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Fluency Disorders provides comprehensive coverage of clinical, experimental, and theoretical aspects of stuttering, including the latest remediation techniques. As the official journal of the International Fluency Association, the journal features full-length research and clinical reports; methodological, theoretical and philosophical articles; reviews; short communications and much more – all readily accessible and tailored to the needs of the professional.