Lying flat city and rat race city: Chinese cities’ land development strategies

Nannan Xu
{"title":"Lying flat city and rat race city: Chinese cities’ land development strategies","authors":"Nannan Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.ugj.2025.05.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A characteristic feature of China’s urbanization is the active role of city governments in organizing and financing land development. Through this process, local governments capture trillions of yuan in land value annually, channeling these revenues into urban infrastructure—a phenomenon widely known as land finance. While existing studies have extensively documented the socio-economic effects of land finance, less attention has been paid to its institutional origins, particularly how local governments shaped its development. This article adopts a historical institutionalist approach to examine the formation of land and infrastructure development institutions in Chongqing and Beijing since the late 1990s. By comparing these two contrasting cases, the study reveals what efforts city governments could make to create an active land development strategy, and how the strategy could remain passive without these efforts. This article argues that entrepreneurial municipalism best characterises Chinese city governments’ strategic efforts in land development. Key efforts include: setting ambitious urban development goals, centralising land management authority, and providing political and economic support to public asset corporations of land and infrastructure development. Revealing these efforts might help cities in other developing countries to devise their land development strategies for capturing land value in rapid urbanisation and industrialisation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101266,"journal":{"name":"Urban Governance","volume":"5 2","pages":"Pages 155-168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2664328625000312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A characteristic feature of China’s urbanization is the active role of city governments in organizing and financing land development. Through this process, local governments capture trillions of yuan in land value annually, channeling these revenues into urban infrastructure—a phenomenon widely known as land finance. While existing studies have extensively documented the socio-economic effects of land finance, less attention has been paid to its institutional origins, particularly how local governments shaped its development. This article adopts a historical institutionalist approach to examine the formation of land and infrastructure development institutions in Chongqing and Beijing since the late 1990s. By comparing these two contrasting cases, the study reveals what efforts city governments could make to create an active land development strategy, and how the strategy could remain passive without these efforts. This article argues that entrepreneurial municipalism best characterises Chinese city governments’ strategic efforts in land development. Key efforts include: setting ambitious urban development goals, centralising land management authority, and providing political and economic support to public asset corporations of land and infrastructure development. Revealing these efforts might help cities in other developing countries to devise their land development strategies for capturing land value in rapid urbanisation and industrialisation.
平地城市与竞争激烈的城市:中国城市的土地开发战略
中国城市化的一个特征是城市政府在组织和资助土地开发方面的积极作用。通过这一过程,地方政府每年获得数万亿元的土地价值,将这些收入用于城市基础设施建设,这种现象被广泛称为土地财政。虽然现有的研究广泛记录了土地财政的社会经济影响,但对其制度起源的关注较少,特别是地方政府如何影响其发展。本文采用历史制度主义的研究方法,考察了20世纪90年代末以来重庆和北京土地和基础设施开发制度的形成。通过比较这两个对比案例,研究揭示了城市政府可以做出哪些努力来制定积极的土地开发战略,以及如果没有这些努力,该战略如何保持被动。本文认为,创业型市政主义是中国城市政府在土地开发方面的战略努力的最佳特征。主要工作包括:制定雄心勃勃的城市发展目标,集中土地管理权,向土地和基础设施发展的公共资产公司提供政治和经济支持。揭示这些努力可能有助于其他发展中国家的城市制定土地开发战略,以便在快速城市化和工业化中获取土地价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信