Transforming teacher feedback: A checklist for assessing and supporting reading skills, motivation and student agency in oral reading

IF 3.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Karianne Megard Grønli , Bente Rigmor Walgermo , Per Henning Uppstad , Erin Margaret McTigue
{"title":"Transforming teacher feedback: A checklist for assessing and supporting reading skills, motivation and student agency in oral reading","authors":"Karianne Megard Grønli ,&nbsp;Bente Rigmor Walgermo ,&nbsp;Per Henning Uppstad ,&nbsp;Erin Margaret McTigue","doi":"10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Teachers’ supportive feedback is essential for young students’ reading development and academic thriving. In providing feedback on oral reading, however, teachers typically focus on measurable aspects, such as accuracy in word reading, while neglecting other broader competencies that are also crucial for reading development and student agency. The present study investigates how the <em>Read To Me Checklist</em>, a feedback intervention designed to improve the quality of teachers’ feedback across multiple reading dimensions, can also foster student agency in reading. Employing an exploratory mixed-methods design, we gathered detailed insights from teachers regarding their observations, focus areas, and proposed feedback on two recorded cases of students’ readings with contextual information. This occurred before and after a non-intrusive intervention spanning 7–9 weeks, alongside students’ self-reports on agency. The findings suggest that the teachers’ feedback practices became more multifaceted and focused on promoting agency, with an increased emphasis on motivation and comprehension. While the decoding aspect was slightly less prominent in the teachers’ feedback after the intervention, it remained the central aspect in their overall assessment practices. The findings related to agency were supported by combining students’ reports on agency with data on teachers’ beliefs. The intervention provides a cost-effective strategy to expand feedback practices, covering a wider range of reading aspects, including comprehension, motivation, and decoding. This beneficial change in teachers’ feedback is particularly notable for the minimalistic nature of the intervention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10635,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 102377"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X25000426","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Teachers’ supportive feedback is essential for young students’ reading development and academic thriving. In providing feedback on oral reading, however, teachers typically focus on measurable aspects, such as accuracy in word reading, while neglecting other broader competencies that are also crucial for reading development and student agency. The present study investigates how the Read To Me Checklist, a feedback intervention designed to improve the quality of teachers’ feedback across multiple reading dimensions, can also foster student agency in reading. Employing an exploratory mixed-methods design, we gathered detailed insights from teachers regarding their observations, focus areas, and proposed feedback on two recorded cases of students’ readings with contextual information. This occurred before and after a non-intrusive intervention spanning 7–9 weeks, alongside students’ self-reports on agency. The findings suggest that the teachers’ feedback practices became more multifaceted and focused on promoting agency, with an increased emphasis on motivation and comprehension. While the decoding aspect was slightly less prominent in the teachers’ feedback after the intervention, it remained the central aspect in their overall assessment practices. The findings related to agency were supported by combining students’ reports on agency with data on teachers’ beliefs. The intervention provides a cost-effective strategy to expand feedback practices, covering a wider range of reading aspects, including comprehension, motivation, and decoding. This beneficial change in teachers’ feedback is particularly notable for the minimalistic nature of the intervention.
转化教师反馈:一份评估和支持阅读技巧、动机和学生口头阅读能动性的清单
教师的支持性反馈对青年学生的阅读发展和学业发展至关重要。然而,在提供口头阅读反馈时,教师通常关注可测量的方面,如单词阅读的准确性,而忽视了其他对阅读发展和学生代理至关重要的更广泛的能力。摘要本研究旨在探讨“为我朗读”评量表,这一旨在提高教师在多个阅读维度上的反馈质量的反馈干预措施,如何也能促进学生的阅读能动性。采用探索性混合方法设计,我们从教师那里收集了关于他们的观察、关注领域的详细见解,并对两个学生阅读的记录案例提出了反馈意见。这发生在非侵入性干预之前和之后,时间跨度为7-9周,以及学生对代理的自我报告。研究结果表明,教师的反馈实践变得更加多元化,并侧重于促进代理,越来越强调动机和理解。虽然解码方面在干预后的教师反馈中略显不突出,但它仍然是他们整体评估实践的中心方面。学生对代理的报告与教师信念的数据相结合,支持了与代理相关的研究结果。干预提供了一种经济有效的策略来扩展反馈实践,涵盖更广泛的阅读方面,包括理解、动机和解码。教师反馈的这种有益变化尤其值得注意的是干预的极简性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Contemporary Educational Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
16.50
自引率
3.90%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Contemporary Educational Psychology is a scholarly journal that publishes empirical research from various parts of the world. The research aims to substantially advance, extend, or re-envision the ongoing discourse in educational psychology research and practice. To be considered for publication, manuscripts must be well-grounded in a comprehensive theoretical and empirical framework. This framework should raise critical and timely questions that educational psychology currently faces. Additionally, the questions asked should be closely related to the chosen methodological approach, and the authors should provide actionable implications for education research and practice. The journal seeks to publish manuscripts that offer cutting-edge theoretical and methodological perspectives on critical and timely education questions. The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Contents Pages in Education, Australian Educational Index, Current Contents, EBSCOhost, Education Index, ERA, PsycINFO, Sociology of Education Abstracts, PubMed/Medline, BIOSIS Previews, and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信