Karianne Megard Grønli , Bente Rigmor Walgermo , Per Henning Uppstad , Erin Margaret McTigue
{"title":"Transforming teacher feedback: A checklist for assessing and supporting reading skills, motivation and student agency in oral reading","authors":"Karianne Megard Grønli , Bente Rigmor Walgermo , Per Henning Uppstad , Erin Margaret McTigue","doi":"10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Teachers’ supportive feedback is essential for young students’ reading development and academic thriving. In providing feedback on oral reading, however, teachers typically focus on measurable aspects, such as accuracy in word reading, while neglecting other broader competencies that are also crucial for reading development and student agency. The present study investigates how the <em>Read To Me Checklist</em>, a feedback intervention designed to improve the quality of teachers’ feedback across multiple reading dimensions, can also foster student agency in reading. Employing an exploratory mixed-methods design, we gathered detailed insights from teachers regarding their observations, focus areas, and proposed feedback on two recorded cases of students’ readings with contextual information. This occurred before and after a non-intrusive intervention spanning 7–9 weeks, alongside students’ self-reports on agency. The findings suggest that the teachers’ feedback practices became more multifaceted and focused on promoting agency, with an increased emphasis on motivation and comprehension. While the decoding aspect was slightly less prominent in the teachers’ feedback after the intervention, it remained the central aspect in their overall assessment practices. The findings related to agency were supported by combining students’ reports on agency with data on teachers’ beliefs. The intervention provides a cost-effective strategy to expand feedback practices, covering a wider range of reading aspects, including comprehension, motivation, and decoding. This beneficial change in teachers’ feedback is particularly notable for the minimalistic nature of the intervention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10635,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 102377"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X25000426","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Teachers’ supportive feedback is essential for young students’ reading development and academic thriving. In providing feedback on oral reading, however, teachers typically focus on measurable aspects, such as accuracy in word reading, while neglecting other broader competencies that are also crucial for reading development and student agency. The present study investigates how the Read To Me Checklist, a feedback intervention designed to improve the quality of teachers’ feedback across multiple reading dimensions, can also foster student agency in reading. Employing an exploratory mixed-methods design, we gathered detailed insights from teachers regarding their observations, focus areas, and proposed feedback on two recorded cases of students’ readings with contextual information. This occurred before and after a non-intrusive intervention spanning 7–9 weeks, alongside students’ self-reports on agency. The findings suggest that the teachers’ feedback practices became more multifaceted and focused on promoting agency, with an increased emphasis on motivation and comprehension. While the decoding aspect was slightly less prominent in the teachers’ feedback after the intervention, it remained the central aspect in their overall assessment practices. The findings related to agency were supported by combining students’ reports on agency with data on teachers’ beliefs. The intervention provides a cost-effective strategy to expand feedback practices, covering a wider range of reading aspects, including comprehension, motivation, and decoding. This beneficial change in teachers’ feedback is particularly notable for the minimalistic nature of the intervention.
期刊介绍:
Contemporary Educational Psychology is a scholarly journal that publishes empirical research from various parts of the world. The research aims to substantially advance, extend, or re-envision the ongoing discourse in educational psychology research and practice. To be considered for publication, manuscripts must be well-grounded in a comprehensive theoretical and empirical framework. This framework should raise critical and timely questions that educational psychology currently faces. Additionally, the questions asked should be closely related to the chosen methodological approach, and the authors should provide actionable implications for education research and practice. The journal seeks to publish manuscripts that offer cutting-edge theoretical and methodological perspectives on critical and timely education questions.
The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Contents Pages in Education, Australian Educational Index, Current Contents, EBSCOhost, Education Index, ERA, PsycINFO, Sociology of Education Abstracts, PubMed/Medline, BIOSIS Previews, and others.