Clearer flow, lower glow: Reassessing water valuation amid water quality improvement

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Xun Fan , Mengdi Liu , Bing Zhang , Qianqian Wang
{"title":"Clearer flow, lower glow: Reassessing water valuation amid water quality improvement","authors":"Xun Fan ,&nbsp;Mengdi Liu ,&nbsp;Bing Zhang ,&nbsp;Qianqian Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There is an implicit assumption in most regulatory analyses that baseline environmental conditions are static. In developing countries, rapid environmental improvements resulting from regulation can amplify the biases created by this assumption. This paper is the first attempt to link water quality as a baseline environmental condition with the marginal value of clean water. Leveraging positive shocks to water quality through the dissemination of water quality information to governments in an experiment in China, this paper estimates the effect of water quality on willingness to pay (WTP) for clean water. With an instrumental variable (IV) model, we find that a one-unit increase in water quality index would lead to an approximate 34.2 % decrease in WTP for clean water. Our findings highlight the diminishing marginal value of clean water in developing countries with tightening regulations and rapidly improving water quality. This suggests that overlooking the relationship between water quality and marginal value of clean water may lead to an overestimation of policy benefits. In addition, we provide suggestive evidence that our findings of a negative WTP effect are likely attributable to the reduction in perceived water quality risks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"115 ","pages":"Article 108056"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525002537","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is an implicit assumption in most regulatory analyses that baseline environmental conditions are static. In developing countries, rapid environmental improvements resulting from regulation can amplify the biases created by this assumption. This paper is the first attempt to link water quality as a baseline environmental condition with the marginal value of clean water. Leveraging positive shocks to water quality through the dissemination of water quality information to governments in an experiment in China, this paper estimates the effect of water quality on willingness to pay (WTP) for clean water. With an instrumental variable (IV) model, we find that a one-unit increase in water quality index would lead to an approximate 34.2 % decrease in WTP for clean water. Our findings highlight the diminishing marginal value of clean water in developing countries with tightening regulations and rapidly improving water quality. This suggests that overlooking the relationship between water quality and marginal value of clean water may lead to an overestimation of policy benefits. In addition, we provide suggestive evidence that our findings of a negative WTP effect are likely attributable to the reduction in perceived water quality risks.
水流更清,辉光更低:水质改善中的水价值重估
在大多数监管分析中有一个隐含的假设,即基线环境条件是静态的。在发展中国家,监管带来的环境迅速改善可能会放大这种假设造成的偏见。本文首次尝试将水质作为基准环境条件与净水边际值联系起来。在中国的一项实验中,通过向政府传播水质信息,利用对水质的正面冲击,估计了水质对净水支付意愿(WTP)的影响。利用工具变量(IV)模型,我们发现水质指数每增加一个单位,净水WTP就会减少34.2%。我们的研究结果强调了清洁水在发展中国家的边际价值递减,这些国家的监管越来越严格,水质迅速改善。这表明忽视水质与清洁水边际价值之间的关系可能导致对政策效益的高估。此外,我们提供了启发性的证据,表明我们的负面WTP效应的发现可能归因于感知水质风险的降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信