{"title":"Equilibrium model of the impact of renewable portfolio standards and tradable green certificates on China's power supply chain","authors":"Huan Zhang , Sien Chen , Jianli Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.jup.2025.101999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The global shift toward renewable energy has gained momentum as nations strive to address environmental challenges and ensure energy security, with policies such as the Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPSs) and Tradable Green Certificates (TGCs) playing pivotal roles. This study develops a power supply chain network (PSCN) equilibrium model that incorporates variations in renewable energy targets to examine the complex dynamics of how PSCNs are influenced by RPS and TGC policies. The findings reveal that although increasing installed capacity supports greater renewable power consumption within the power mix, the efficiency of this growth is limited, and relying solely on capacity expansion is not a cost-effective strategy. We show that well-calibrated RPSs can effectively boost power generation from renewable energy resources (REPs) and enhance environmental benefits within PSCNs. However, higher RPS targets may reduce the overall profitability of PSCNs, though they contribute positively to environmental improvements. Notably, the social benefits of the supply chain follow a U-shaped pattern as RPS targets, suggesting that determining an optimal target is crucial for maximizing social welfare. Our study highlights the importance of integrating TGC transactions into China's power market under RPSs and the need for proactive policy design to optimize social outcomes and promote REP growth.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23554,"journal":{"name":"Utilities Policy","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 101999"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utilities Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725001146","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The global shift toward renewable energy has gained momentum as nations strive to address environmental challenges and ensure energy security, with policies such as the Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPSs) and Tradable Green Certificates (TGCs) playing pivotal roles. This study develops a power supply chain network (PSCN) equilibrium model that incorporates variations in renewable energy targets to examine the complex dynamics of how PSCNs are influenced by RPS and TGC policies. The findings reveal that although increasing installed capacity supports greater renewable power consumption within the power mix, the efficiency of this growth is limited, and relying solely on capacity expansion is not a cost-effective strategy. We show that well-calibrated RPSs can effectively boost power generation from renewable energy resources (REPs) and enhance environmental benefits within PSCNs. However, higher RPS targets may reduce the overall profitability of PSCNs, though they contribute positively to environmental improvements. Notably, the social benefits of the supply chain follow a U-shaped pattern as RPS targets, suggesting that determining an optimal target is crucial for maximizing social welfare. Our study highlights the importance of integrating TGC transactions into China's power market under RPSs and the need for proactive policy design to optimize social outcomes and promote REP growth.
期刊介绍:
Utilities Policy is deliberately international, interdisciplinary, and intersectoral. Articles address utility trends and issues in both developed and developing economies. Authors and reviewers come from various disciplines, including economics, political science, sociology, law, finance, accounting, management, and engineering. Areas of focus include the utility and network industries providing essential electricity, natural gas, water and wastewater, solid waste, communications, broadband, postal, and public transportation services.
Utilities Policy invites submissions that apply various quantitative and qualitative methods. Contributions are welcome from both established and emerging scholars as well as accomplished practitioners. Interdisciplinary, comparative, and applied works are encouraged. Submissions to the journal should have a clear focus on governance, performance, and/or analysis of public utilities with an aim toward informing the policymaking process and providing recommendations as appropriate. Relevant topics and issues include but are not limited to industry structures and ownership, market design and dynamics, economic development, resource planning, system modeling, accounting and finance, infrastructure investment, supply and demand efficiency, strategic management and productivity, network operations and integration, supply chains, adaptation and flexibility, service-quality standards, benchmarking and metrics, benefit-cost analysis, behavior and incentives, pricing and demand response, economic and environmental regulation, regulatory performance and impact, restructuring and deregulation, and policy institutions.