Equilibrium model of the impact of renewable portfolio standards and tradable green certificates on China's power supply chain

IF 3.8 3区 经济学 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Huan Zhang , Sien Chen , Jianli Jiang
{"title":"Equilibrium model of the impact of renewable portfolio standards and tradable green certificates on China's power supply chain","authors":"Huan Zhang ,&nbsp;Sien Chen ,&nbsp;Jianli Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.jup.2025.101999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The global shift toward renewable energy has gained momentum as nations strive to address environmental challenges and ensure energy security, with policies such as the Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPSs) and Tradable Green Certificates (TGCs) playing pivotal roles. This study develops a power supply chain network (PSCN) equilibrium model that incorporates variations in renewable energy targets to examine the complex dynamics of how PSCNs are influenced by RPS and TGC policies. The findings reveal that although increasing installed capacity supports greater renewable power consumption within the power mix, the efficiency of this growth is limited, and relying solely on capacity expansion is not a cost-effective strategy. We show that well-calibrated RPSs can effectively boost power generation from renewable energy resources (REPs) and enhance environmental benefits within PSCNs. However, higher RPS targets may reduce the overall profitability of PSCNs, though they contribute positively to environmental improvements. Notably, the social benefits of the supply chain follow a U-shaped pattern as RPS targets, suggesting that determining an optimal target is crucial for maximizing social welfare. Our study highlights the importance of integrating TGC transactions into China's power market under RPSs and the need for proactive policy design to optimize social outcomes and promote REP growth.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23554,"journal":{"name":"Utilities Policy","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 101999"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utilities Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725001146","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global shift toward renewable energy has gained momentum as nations strive to address environmental challenges and ensure energy security, with policies such as the Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPSs) and Tradable Green Certificates (TGCs) playing pivotal roles. This study develops a power supply chain network (PSCN) equilibrium model that incorporates variations in renewable energy targets to examine the complex dynamics of how PSCNs are influenced by RPS and TGC policies. The findings reveal that although increasing installed capacity supports greater renewable power consumption within the power mix, the efficiency of this growth is limited, and relying solely on capacity expansion is not a cost-effective strategy. We show that well-calibrated RPSs can effectively boost power generation from renewable energy resources (REPs) and enhance environmental benefits within PSCNs. However, higher RPS targets may reduce the overall profitability of PSCNs, though they contribute positively to environmental improvements. Notably, the social benefits of the supply chain follow a U-shaped pattern as RPS targets, suggesting that determining an optimal target is crucial for maximizing social welfare. Our study highlights the importance of integrating TGC transactions into China's power market under RPSs and the need for proactive policy design to optimize social outcomes and promote REP growth.
可再生能源投资组合标准与可交易绿色证书对中国电力供应链影响的均衡模型
随着各国努力应对环境挑战和确保能源安全,全球向可再生能源的转变势头强劲,可再生能源投资组合标准(RPSs)和可交易绿色证书(TGCs)等政策发挥了关键作用。本研究建立了一个电力供应链网络(PSCN)平衡模型,该模型包含可再生能源目标的变化,以研究RPS和TGC政策如何影响PSCN的复杂动态。研究结果表明,尽管装机容量的增加支持了可再生能源在电力结构中的更大消费,但这种增长的效率是有限的,而且仅仅依靠装机容量扩张并不是一种具有成本效益的策略。研究表明,校准良好的可再生能源发电系统可以有效地促进可再生能源发电,并提高可再生能源发电系统内的环境效益。然而,较高的RPS目标可能会降低PSCNs的总体盈利能力,尽管它们对环境改善作出了积极贡献。值得注意的是,供应链的社会效益作为RPS目标呈u型分布,这表明确定最优目标对于实现社会福利最大化至关重要。我们的研究强调了在可再生能源制度下,将可再生能源交易整合到中国电力市场的重要性,以及积极的政策设计以优化社会结果和促进可再生能源增长的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Utilities Policy
Utilities Policy ENERGY & FUELS-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Utilities Policy is deliberately international, interdisciplinary, and intersectoral. Articles address utility trends and issues in both developed and developing economies. Authors and reviewers come from various disciplines, including economics, political science, sociology, law, finance, accounting, management, and engineering. Areas of focus include the utility and network industries providing essential electricity, natural gas, water and wastewater, solid waste, communications, broadband, postal, and public transportation services. Utilities Policy invites submissions that apply various quantitative and qualitative methods. Contributions are welcome from both established and emerging scholars as well as accomplished practitioners. Interdisciplinary, comparative, and applied works are encouraged. Submissions to the journal should have a clear focus on governance, performance, and/or analysis of public utilities with an aim toward informing the policymaking process and providing recommendations as appropriate. Relevant topics and issues include but are not limited to industry structures and ownership, market design and dynamics, economic development, resource planning, system modeling, accounting and finance, infrastructure investment, supply and demand efficiency, strategic management and productivity, network operations and integration, supply chains, adaptation and flexibility, service-quality standards, benchmarking and metrics, benefit-cost analysis, behavior and incentives, pricing and demand response, economic and environmental regulation, regulatory performance and impact, restructuring and deregulation, and policy institutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信