Prosodic disambiguation of the Mandarin discourse marker Fanzheng (“anyway”): A corpus-based study of functional asymmetry at utterance peripheries

IF 1.8 1区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Yi Shan , Weiwei Chu
{"title":"Prosodic disambiguation of the Mandarin discourse marker Fanzheng (“anyway”): A corpus-based study of functional asymmetry at utterance peripheries","authors":"Yi Shan ,&nbsp;Weiwei Chu","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.06.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the prosody-pragmatics interface of the Mandarin Chinese discourse marker (DM) <em>fanzheng</em> in spontaneous conversation, focusing on how prosodic features contribute to its functional differentiation at the left and right peripheries of utterances. Using data from the CABank Mandarin CallFriend Mainland Corpus, we conducted a comparative analysis of 322 tokens of <em>fanzheng</em>, examining their distribution, prosodic characteristics, and pragmatic functions. Our findings reveal a significant distributional asymmetry, with 82 % of tokens occurring at the left periphery and 12 % at the right periphery. This asymmetry correlates with distinct functional roles, supporting the concept of functional asymmetry in DMs. Prosodic analysis across multiple variables (duration, tempo, intensity, and pause duration) showed significant differences between left- and right-periphery tokens. Based on these differences, we constructed a prosody-periphery model that achieved 97 % accuracy in classifying <em>fanzheng</em> tokens, demonstrating the potential of prosodic features in disambiguating DM functions. The study contributes to the growing body of research on the prosody-pragmatics interface by providing empirical evidence for the role of prosody in disambiguating DM functions and offering a replicable methodology for investigating other DMs. Our findings align with previous research on DM prosody across languages while also highlighting language-specific factors that influence DM usage. This research has implications for language pedagogy, natural language processing, and future studies in discourse analysis. It underscores the need for further cross-linguistic research to explore potential universal patterns in the prosody-pragmatics interface of DMs and calls for investigating the intentional exploitation of prosodic ambiguity in communication strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pragmatics","volume":"245 ","pages":"Pages 84-100"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037821662500147X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the prosody-pragmatics interface of the Mandarin Chinese discourse marker (DM) fanzheng in spontaneous conversation, focusing on how prosodic features contribute to its functional differentiation at the left and right peripheries of utterances. Using data from the CABank Mandarin CallFriend Mainland Corpus, we conducted a comparative analysis of 322 tokens of fanzheng, examining their distribution, prosodic characteristics, and pragmatic functions. Our findings reveal a significant distributional asymmetry, with 82 % of tokens occurring at the left periphery and 12 % at the right periphery. This asymmetry correlates with distinct functional roles, supporting the concept of functional asymmetry in DMs. Prosodic analysis across multiple variables (duration, tempo, intensity, and pause duration) showed significant differences between left- and right-periphery tokens. Based on these differences, we constructed a prosody-periphery model that achieved 97 % accuracy in classifying fanzheng tokens, demonstrating the potential of prosodic features in disambiguating DM functions. The study contributes to the growing body of research on the prosody-pragmatics interface by providing empirical evidence for the role of prosody in disambiguating DM functions and offering a replicable methodology for investigating other DMs. Our findings align with previous research on DM prosody across languages while also highlighting language-specific factors that influence DM usage. This research has implications for language pedagogy, natural language processing, and future studies in discourse analysis. It underscores the need for further cross-linguistic research to explore potential universal patterns in the prosody-pragmatics interface of DMs and calls for investigating the intentional exploitation of prosodic ambiguity in communication strategies.
普通话话语标记“反正”的韵律消歧:基于语料库的话语外围功能不对称研究
本研究探讨了普通话话语标记语“饭正”在自发对话中的韵律-语用界面,重点探讨了韵律特征如何影响其在话语左右外围的功能分化。本文利用CABank普通话CallFriend大陆语料库数据,对322个繁正语词进行了对比分析,考察了它们的分布、韵律特征和语用功能。我们的研究结果揭示了显著的分布不对称性,82%的标记发生在左外周,12%发生在右外周。这种不对称与不同的功能角色相关,支持DMs中功能不对称的概念。跨多个变量(持续时间、节奏、强度和停顿时间)的韵律分析显示,左右外围标记之间存在显著差异。基于这些差异,我们构建了一个韵律-外围模型,该模型对梵语标记的分类准确率达到97%,证明了韵律特征在消歧DM函数中的潜力。该研究为韵律在消歧义DM功能中的作用提供了经验证据,并为研究其他DM提供了可复制的方法,从而促进了韵律-语用界面的研究。我们的研究结果与之前的跨语言DM韵律研究一致,同时也强调了影响DM使用的语言特定因素。本研究对语言教育学、自然语言处理和语篇分析的未来研究具有重要意义。该研究强调需要进一步的跨语言研究来探索韵律语用界面中潜在的普遍模式,并呼吁研究韵律歧义在交际策略中的有意利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
18.80%
发文量
219
期刊介绍: Since 1977, the Journal of Pragmatics has provided a forum for bringing together a wide range of research in pragmatics, including cognitive pragmatics, corpus pragmatics, experimental pragmatics, historical pragmatics, interpersonal pragmatics, multimodal pragmatics, sociopragmatics, theoretical pragmatics and related fields. Our aim is to publish innovative pragmatic scholarship from all perspectives, which contributes to theories of how speakers produce and interpret language in different contexts drawing on attested data from a wide range of languages/cultures in different parts of the world. The Journal of Pragmatics also encourages work that uses attested language data to explore the relationship between pragmatics and neighbouring research areas such as semantics, discourse analysis, conversation analysis and ethnomethodology, interactional linguistics, sociolinguistics, linguistic anthropology, media studies, psychology, sociology, and the philosophy of language. Alongside full-length articles, discussion notes and book reviews, the journal welcomes proposals for high quality special issues in all areas of pragmatics which make a significant contribution to a topical or developing area at the cutting-edge of research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信