The effect of unit portion size and food weight cues on visual and tactile intended consumption assessments

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Bingxue Li, Xiangling Zhuang, Guojie Ma
{"title":"The effect of unit portion size and food weight cues on visual and tactile intended consumption assessments","authors":"Bingxue Li,&nbsp;Xiangling Zhuang,&nbsp;Guojie Ma","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Obesity is a global health issue and one of the leading causes of chronic disease. In the current food environment, portion size is a key factor contributing to obesity, as its increase leads to a corresponding rise in food intake. This phenomenon is known as the “portion size effect”. Understanding how people estimate their food intake is crucial in combating this issue. People typically estimate their intake based on food portion sizes before eating, and this intended consumption closely correlates with actual intake. Therefore, adjusting the assessment of intended consumption could influence actual intake, moderating the portion size effect. This study investigated the impact of unit portion size and weight cues in evaluating intended consumption through visual and tactile assessments. Thirty-two participants completed 48 assessments by viewing food images in a visual task, and another 48 assessments by touching foods in a tactile task. The results indicated that intended consumption was greater for large unit portion sizes in both visual and tactile tasks. However, when participants were provided with food weight cues, their intended consumption increased for smaller portion sizes and decreased for larger portion sizes, partially mitigating the portion size effect. In addition, there are differences between visual and tactile assessment modalities, with higher intended consumption in the tactile assessment task. This study revealed that both weight cues and sensory models could influence intended consumption, and these should be further used to promote healthy eating.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 105625"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325002009","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Obesity is a global health issue and one of the leading causes of chronic disease. In the current food environment, portion size is a key factor contributing to obesity, as its increase leads to a corresponding rise in food intake. This phenomenon is known as the “portion size effect”. Understanding how people estimate their food intake is crucial in combating this issue. People typically estimate their intake based on food portion sizes before eating, and this intended consumption closely correlates with actual intake. Therefore, adjusting the assessment of intended consumption could influence actual intake, moderating the portion size effect. This study investigated the impact of unit portion size and weight cues in evaluating intended consumption through visual and tactile assessments. Thirty-two participants completed 48 assessments by viewing food images in a visual task, and another 48 assessments by touching foods in a tactile task. The results indicated that intended consumption was greater for large unit portion sizes in both visual and tactile tasks. However, when participants were provided with food weight cues, their intended consumption increased for smaller portion sizes and decreased for larger portion sizes, partially mitigating the portion size effect. In addition, there are differences between visual and tactile assessment modalities, with higher intended consumption in the tactile assessment task. This study revealed that both weight cues and sensory models could influence intended consumption, and these should be further used to promote healthy eating.
单位份量和食物重量提示对视觉和触觉预期消费评估的影响
肥胖是一个全球性的健康问题,也是慢性疾病的主要原因之一。在当前的食物环境中,份量是导致肥胖的一个关键因素,因为份量的增加会导致食物摄入量的相应增加。这种现象被称为“份量效应”。了解人们如何估计他们的食物摄入量对于解决这个问题至关重要。人们通常根据饭前的食物份量来估计自己的摄入量,而这一预期摄入量与实际摄入量密切相关。因此,调整预期摄入量的评估可能会影响实际摄入量,从而缓和份量效应。本研究通过视觉和触觉评估调查了单位份量和重量线索在评估预期消费中的影响。32名参与者在视觉任务中通过观看食物图像完成48项评估,另外48项在触觉任务中通过触摸食物完成评估。结果表明,在视觉和触觉任务中,大单位份量的预期消耗量都更大。然而,当参与者提供食物重量线索时,他们的预期摄入量在小份量时增加,在大份量时减少,部分减轻了份量效应。此外,视觉评估与触觉评估存在差异,触觉评估任务的预期消耗更高。这项研究表明,体重线索和感官模型都可以影响预期的摄入量,这些应该进一步用于促进健康饮食。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信