Tech collaboration & digital inclusion: Reshaping global trade in the age of climate policy

IF 4.9 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Muhammad Saeed Meo , Alvena Anees
{"title":"Tech collaboration & digital inclusion: Reshaping global trade in the age of climate policy","authors":"Muhammad Saeed Meo ,&nbsp;Alvena Anees","doi":"10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The unrestrained carbon emissions emanating from international trade are ominously threatening environmental quality; however, this pressing issue remains understudied, underscoring the imperative for robust investigation and informed policy responses. In response to this imperative, the current study delves into the impact of international technological collaboration (IC) and digital inclusion (DIGI) on U.S. trade-embodied emissions. The study further assesses whether Climate Policy Stringency (CPS) alters the impact of IC and DIGI on U.S. trade-embodied emissions. Using quarterly data covering the period from 2000 to 2021, the study employs a time-varying rolling-window bootstrap (RWB) approach. The results affirm that IC and DIGI reduce U.S. trade-embodied emissions. Furthermore, moderation analysis confirms that CPS intensifies IC’s negative effect on trade-embodied emissions. Surprisingly, CPS fails to significantly moderate the DIGI-emissions linkage. To validate the findings, a robustness check is conducted using the Quantile-Quantile Regression (QQR) approach, and the results align with those obtained through the rolling-window bootstrap method. Additionally, the findings reveal an asymmetrical association between the variables under consideration. These outcomes hold crucial policy implications for U.S. policymakers. It is recommended that U.S. officials actively promote and support collaborative research and development initiatives with other nations to facilitate the exchange of environmentally sustainable technologies. Moreover, policies aimed at bolstering digital inclusion across sectors should be implemented to ensure that the benefits of technological advancements reach a broader population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34478,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Futures","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100890"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Futures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666188825004551","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The unrestrained carbon emissions emanating from international trade are ominously threatening environmental quality; however, this pressing issue remains understudied, underscoring the imperative for robust investigation and informed policy responses. In response to this imperative, the current study delves into the impact of international technological collaboration (IC) and digital inclusion (DIGI) on U.S. trade-embodied emissions. The study further assesses whether Climate Policy Stringency (CPS) alters the impact of IC and DIGI on U.S. trade-embodied emissions. Using quarterly data covering the period from 2000 to 2021, the study employs a time-varying rolling-window bootstrap (RWB) approach. The results affirm that IC and DIGI reduce U.S. trade-embodied emissions. Furthermore, moderation analysis confirms that CPS intensifies IC’s negative effect on trade-embodied emissions. Surprisingly, CPS fails to significantly moderate the DIGI-emissions linkage. To validate the findings, a robustness check is conducted using the Quantile-Quantile Regression (QQR) approach, and the results align with those obtained through the rolling-window bootstrap method. Additionally, the findings reveal an asymmetrical association between the variables under consideration. These outcomes hold crucial policy implications for U.S. policymakers. It is recommended that U.S. officials actively promote and support collaborative research and development initiatives with other nations to facilitate the exchange of environmentally sustainable technologies. Moreover, policies aimed at bolstering digital inclusion across sectors should be implemented to ensure that the benefits of technological advancements reach a broader population.
技术合作与数字包容:在气候政策时代重塑全球贸易
国际贸易产生的无节制的碳排放对环境质量构成了严重威胁;然而,这一紧迫的问题仍未得到充分的研究,强调了强有力的调查和知情的政策反应的必要性。为了应对这一迫切需要,本研究深入研究了国际技术合作(IC)和数字包容(DIGI)对美国贸易排放的影响。该研究进一步评估了气候政策严格性(CPS)是否会改变IC和DIGI对美国贸易排放的影响。该研究使用了2000年至2021年的季度数据,采用了时变滚动窗自举(RWB)方法。结果证实,IC和DIGI减少了美国的贸易排放。此外,适度分析证实,CPS加剧了国际贸易对贸易隐含排放的负面影响。令人惊讶的是,CPS未能显著缓和数字与排放的联系。为了验证这些发现,使用分位数-分位数回归(QQR)方法进行了稳健性检查,结果与通过滚动窗口自举方法获得的结果一致。此外,研究结果揭示了所考虑的变量之间的不对称关联。这些结果对美国决策者具有重要的政策意义。建议美国官员积极推动和支持与其他国家的合作研究与开发计划,以促进环境可持续技术的交流。此外,应实施旨在加强跨部门数字包容的政策,以确保技术进步的好处惠及更广泛的人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainable Futures
Sustainable Futures Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
34
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable Futures: is a journal focused on the intersection of sustainability, environment and technology from various disciplines in social sciences, and their larger implications for corporation, government, education institutions, regions and society both at present and in the future. It provides an advanced platform for studies related to sustainability and sustainable development in society, economics, environment, and culture. The scope of the journal is broad and encourages interdisciplinary research, as well as welcoming theoretical and practical research from all methodological approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信