Stefano Moro, Salvatore Valente, Martina Arcioni, Fabio Falsone, Danilo Scannella, Michele Luca Geraci, Manfredi Di Lorenzo, Giacomo Milisenda, Fabrizio Serena, Francesco Colloca
{"title":"Living on the Extinction Edge: Resilience to Fishing and Rebound Potential of the Mediterranean Elasmobranchs","authors":"Stefano Moro, Salvatore Valente, Martina Arcioni, Fabio Falsone, Danilo Scannella, Michele Luca Geraci, Manfredi Di Lorenzo, Giacomo Milisenda, Fabrizio Serena, Francesco Colloca","doi":"10.1111/faf.12911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mediterranean elasmobranchs are experiencing significant declines due to intense fishing activities, making the region a global hotspot for elasmobranch conservation concerns. These declines are worsened by limited fisheries data, constraining stock assessments and evidence‐based management. Demographic models based on life history parameters (e.g., survival rate, age‐at‐maturity, litter size and longevity) offer critical alternatives for estimating population productivity in data‐poor contexts. In this study, we estimated the intrinsic rate of population increase () for 82 stocks across 51 species of Mediterranean sharks and rays to assess their relative capacity for recovery under hypothetical sustainable exploitation scenarios. Using demographic modelling and updated life history data, we provide a comparative analysis of species‐specific productivity and identify those with the lowest recovery potential. Many IUCN‐listed threatened species exhibited very low rebound potential, highlighting their vulnerability to fishing. Significant data gaps, especially for pelagic and deep‐sea taxa, underscore the need for targeted life history research. Our results also showed how the rebound potential can provide valuable insight for data‐deficient species, supporting informed assessments with limited biological input. Furthermore, we confirmed that age‐at‐maturity is a valid proxy of when other parameters are unavailable. This study delivers a comprehensive, regional‐scale productivity baseline for Mediterranean elasmobranchs, providing essential input for prioritising species‐specific conservation actions, guiding fishery policy development and improving regional compliance with international conservation frameworks. By addressing critical data limitations, our approach enhances the scientific foundation necessary for the sustainable management and recovery of shark and ray populations in the Mediterranean Sea.","PeriodicalId":169,"journal":{"name":"Fish and Fisheries","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fish and Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12911","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Mediterranean elasmobranchs are experiencing significant declines due to intense fishing activities, making the region a global hotspot for elasmobranch conservation concerns. These declines are worsened by limited fisheries data, constraining stock assessments and evidence‐based management. Demographic models based on life history parameters (e.g., survival rate, age‐at‐maturity, litter size and longevity) offer critical alternatives for estimating population productivity in data‐poor contexts. In this study, we estimated the intrinsic rate of population increase () for 82 stocks across 51 species of Mediterranean sharks and rays to assess their relative capacity for recovery under hypothetical sustainable exploitation scenarios. Using demographic modelling and updated life history data, we provide a comparative analysis of species‐specific productivity and identify those with the lowest recovery potential. Many IUCN‐listed threatened species exhibited very low rebound potential, highlighting their vulnerability to fishing. Significant data gaps, especially for pelagic and deep‐sea taxa, underscore the need for targeted life history research. Our results also showed how the rebound potential can provide valuable insight for data‐deficient species, supporting informed assessments with limited biological input. Furthermore, we confirmed that age‐at‐maturity is a valid proxy of when other parameters are unavailable. This study delivers a comprehensive, regional‐scale productivity baseline for Mediterranean elasmobranchs, providing essential input for prioritising species‐specific conservation actions, guiding fishery policy development and improving regional compliance with international conservation frameworks. By addressing critical data limitations, our approach enhances the scientific foundation necessary for the sustainable management and recovery of shark and ray populations in the Mediterranean Sea.
期刊介绍:
Fish and Fisheries adopts a broad, interdisciplinary approach to the subject of fish biology and fisheries. It draws contributions in the form of major synoptic papers and syntheses or meta-analyses that lay out new approaches, re-examine existing findings, methods or theory, and discuss papers and commentaries from diverse areas. Focal areas include fish palaeontology, molecular biology and ecology, genetics, biochemistry, physiology, ecology, behaviour, evolutionary studies, conservation, assessment, population dynamics, mathematical modelling, ecosystem analysis and the social, economic and policy aspects of fisheries where they are grounded in a scientific approach. A paper in Fish and Fisheries must draw upon all key elements of the existing literature on a topic, normally have a broad geographic and/or taxonomic scope, and provide general points which make it compelling to a wide range of readers whatever their geographical location. So, in short, we aim to publish articles that make syntheses of old or synoptic, long-term or spatially widespread data, introduce or consolidate fresh concepts or theory, or, in the Ghoti section, briefly justify preliminary, new synoptic ideas. Please note that authors of submissions not meeting this mandate will be directed to the appropriate primary literature.