Critical components of 'Early Intervention in Psychosis': national retrospective cohort study.

Ryan Williams,Ed Penington,Veenu Gupta,Alan Quirk,Apostolos Tsiachristas,Michelle Rickett,Carolyn A Chew-Graham,David Shiers,Paul French,Belinda Lennox,Alex Bottle,Mike J Crawford
{"title":"Critical components of 'Early Intervention in Psychosis': national retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Ryan Williams,Ed Penington,Veenu Gupta,Alan Quirk,Apostolos Tsiachristas,Michelle Rickett,Carolyn A Chew-Graham,David Shiers,Paul French,Belinda Lennox,Alex Bottle,Mike J Crawford","doi":"10.1192/bjp.2025.126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nPsychotic disorders are severe mental health conditions frequently associated with long-term disability, reduced quality of life and premature mortality. Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) services aim to provide timely, comprehensive packages of care for people with psychotic disorders. However, it is not clear which components of EIP services contribute most to the improved outcomes they achieve.\r\n\r\nAIMS\r\nWe aimed to identify associations between specific components of EIP care and clinically significant outcomes for individuals treated for early psychosis in England.\r\n\r\nMETHOD\r\nThis national retrospective cohort study of 14 874 EIP individuals examined associations between 12 components of EIP care and outcomes over a 3-year follow-up period, by linking data from the National Clinical Audit of Psychosis (NCAP) to routine health outcome data held by NHS England. The primary outcome was time to relapse, defined as psychiatric inpatient admission or referral to a crisis resolution (home treatment) team. Secondary outcomes included duration of admissions, detention under the Mental Health Act, emergency department and general hospital attendances and mortality. We conducted multilevel regression analyses incorporating demographic and service-level covariates.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nSmaller care coordinator case-loads and the use of clozapine for eligible people were associated with reduced relapse risk. Physical health interventions were associated with reductions in mortality risk. Other components, such as cognitive-behavioural therapy for psychosis (CBTp), showed associations with improvements in secondary outcomes.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nSmaller case-loads should be prioritised and protected in EIP service design and delivery. Initiatives to improve the uptake of clozapine should be integrated into EIP care. Other components, such as CBTp and physical health interventions, may have specific benefits for those eligible. These findings highlight impactful components of care and should guide resource allocation to optimise EIP service delivery.","PeriodicalId":22495,"journal":{"name":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"55 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2025.126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Psychotic disorders are severe mental health conditions frequently associated with long-term disability, reduced quality of life and premature mortality. Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) services aim to provide timely, comprehensive packages of care for people with psychotic disorders. However, it is not clear which components of EIP services contribute most to the improved outcomes they achieve. AIMS We aimed to identify associations between specific components of EIP care and clinically significant outcomes for individuals treated for early psychosis in England. METHOD This national retrospective cohort study of 14 874 EIP individuals examined associations between 12 components of EIP care and outcomes over a 3-year follow-up period, by linking data from the National Clinical Audit of Psychosis (NCAP) to routine health outcome data held by NHS England. The primary outcome was time to relapse, defined as psychiatric inpatient admission or referral to a crisis resolution (home treatment) team. Secondary outcomes included duration of admissions, detention under the Mental Health Act, emergency department and general hospital attendances and mortality. We conducted multilevel regression analyses incorporating demographic and service-level covariates. RESULTS Smaller care coordinator case-loads and the use of clozapine for eligible people were associated with reduced relapse risk. Physical health interventions were associated with reductions in mortality risk. Other components, such as cognitive-behavioural therapy for psychosis (CBTp), showed associations with improvements in secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Smaller case-loads should be prioritised and protected in EIP service design and delivery. Initiatives to improve the uptake of clozapine should be integrated into EIP care. Other components, such as CBTp and physical health interventions, may have specific benefits for those eligible. These findings highlight impactful components of care and should guide resource allocation to optimise EIP service delivery.
“精神病早期干预”的关键组成部分:国家回顾性队列研究。
精神障碍是一种严重的精神健康状况,通常与长期残疾、生活质量下降和过早死亡有关。精神病早期干预(EIP)服务旨在为精神病患者提供及时、全面的一揽子护理。然而,目前尚不清楚EIP服务的哪些组成部分对其实现的改进结果贡献最大。目的:我们的目的是确定EIP护理的特定组成部分与英国早期精神病治疗个体的临床显著结果之间的关联。方法通过将国家精神病临床审计(NCAP)的数据与英国国民健康服务体系(NHS)的常规健康结果数据联系起来,对14874名EIP患者进行了为期3年的随访,研究了EIP护理的12个组成部分与结果之间的关系。主要结果是复发时间,定义为精神病住院或转介到危机解决(家庭治疗)团队。次要结果包括住院时间、根据《精神卫生法》被拘留的时间、急诊室和综合医院的就诊率和死亡率。我们进行了包含人口统计和服务水平协变量的多水平回归分析。结果:较小的护理协调员病例负荷和对符合条件的人使用氯氮平与降低复发风险相关。身体健康干预措施与降低死亡风险有关。其他组成部分,如精神病认知行为疗法(CBTp),显示出与次要结果改善有关。结论在EIP服务设计和提供中,应优先考虑和保护小病例量。应将改善氯氮平吸收的举措纳入EIP护理。其他组成部分,如CBTp和身体健康干预措施,可能对符合条件的人有特殊好处。这些发现突出了保健的有效组成部分,并应指导资源分配,以优化EIP服务的提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信