Failure of gamma knife radiosurgery for sporadic vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

April N Taniguchi-Lo, Christian M Shannon, Charlotte I Rivers, Shaun A Nguyen, Paul R Lambert
{"title":"Failure of gamma knife radiosurgery for sporadic vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"April N Taniguchi-Lo, Christian M Shannon, Charlotte I Rivers, Shaun A Nguyen, Paul R Lambert","doi":"10.1007/s00405-025-09527-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This review aims to characterize the limitations of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) with investigation of failure rates for primary and salvage (post-surgical) cases, identification of risk factors associated with increased rates of treatment failure, and evaluation adverse outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search (Cochrane Library, PubMed, SCOPUS, and CINAHL) of studies on sporadic vestibular schwannomas treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Primary outcome measures included continuous measures (mean), proportions (%), and relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-three studies (n = 5619 patients) were included. The proportion of GKRS failure for primary (6.4% [95% CI 4.8-7.7]) and salvage treatment (9.0% [5.9-12.8]) did not differ (2.8%, [-0.2-6.9], p = 0.06). When stratified by various thresholds on imaging, an increase of greater than 15% in a tumor's volume was seen 3.2% [2.1-4.6] which was less than rates in other volumetric thresholds of failure (p = 0.0001). Treatment edema identified by brainstem hyperintensity on imaging was the most frequent toxicity (8.8% [7.1-10.8]) with symptomatic management in about 1 in 4 cases. New onset cranial nerve adverse outcomes occurred for trigeminal neuralgia 4.9% [2.8-7.6%], trigeminal numbness 4.3% [2.7-6.2%], and temporary facial paresis 3.2% [1.3-5.9%].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Gamma Knife radiosurgery is an effective treatment for sporadic vestibular schwannomas with low rates of failure. Our findings suggest failure rates are not affected by treatment timing and comparable for the smaller sized tumors. Gamma Knife radiosurgery is safe with minimal adverse outcomes such as cranial nerve dysfunction, required retreatment, or other radiation toxicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":520614,"journal":{"name":"European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09527-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This review aims to characterize the limitations of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) with investigation of failure rates for primary and salvage (post-surgical) cases, identification of risk factors associated with increased rates of treatment failure, and evaluation adverse outcomes.

Methods: A systematic search (Cochrane Library, PubMed, SCOPUS, and CINAHL) of studies on sporadic vestibular schwannomas treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Primary outcome measures included continuous measures (mean), proportions (%), and relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results: Forty-three studies (n = 5619 patients) were included. The proportion of GKRS failure for primary (6.4% [95% CI 4.8-7.7]) and salvage treatment (9.0% [5.9-12.8]) did not differ (2.8%, [-0.2-6.9], p = 0.06). When stratified by various thresholds on imaging, an increase of greater than 15% in a tumor's volume was seen 3.2% [2.1-4.6] which was less than rates in other volumetric thresholds of failure (p = 0.0001). Treatment edema identified by brainstem hyperintensity on imaging was the most frequent toxicity (8.8% [7.1-10.8]) with symptomatic management in about 1 in 4 cases. New onset cranial nerve adverse outcomes occurred for trigeminal neuralgia 4.9% [2.8-7.6%], trigeminal numbness 4.3% [2.7-6.2%], and temporary facial paresis 3.2% [1.3-5.9%].

Conclusion: Gamma Knife radiosurgery is an effective treatment for sporadic vestibular schwannomas with low rates of failure. Our findings suggest failure rates are not affected by treatment timing and comparable for the smaller sized tumors. Gamma Knife radiosurgery is safe with minimal adverse outcomes such as cranial nerve dysfunction, required retreatment, or other radiation toxicity.

伽玛刀放射治疗散发性前庭神经鞘瘤的失败:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:本综述旨在通过调查原发性和抢救性(术后)病例的失败率,确定与治疗失败率增加相关的危险因素,以及评估不良后果,来描述伽玛刀放射手术(GKRS)的局限性。方法:系统检索(Cochrane Library, PubMed, SCOPUS和CINAHL)伽玛刀放射治疗散发性前庭神经鞘瘤的研究,并按照PRISMA指南进行检索。主要结果测量包括连续测量(平均值)、比例(%)和相对危险度(RR), 95%可信区间(CI)。结果:纳入43项研究(n = 5619例患者)。原发性GKRS失败的比例(6.4% [95% CI 4.8-7.7])和抢救治疗(9.0%[5.9-12.8])没有差异(2.8%,[-0.2-6.9],p = 0.06)。当按不同的成像阈值分层时,肿瘤体积增加大于15%的比例为3.2%[2.1-4.6],低于其他体积失败阈值的比例(p = 0.0001)。脑干高显像显示的治疗水肿是最常见的毒性(8.8%[7.1-10.8]),约1 / 4的病例有症状处理。新发颅神经不良事件发生在三叉神经痛4.9%[2.8-7.6%],三叉神经痛4.3%[2.7-6.2%],暂时性面瘫3.2%[1.3-5.9%]。结论:伽玛刀放射治疗散发性前庭神经鞘瘤疗效好,失败率低。我们的研究结果表明,失败率不受治疗时间的影响,并且与较小的肿瘤相当。伽玛刀放射手术是安全的,不良后果最小,如脑神经功能障碍,需要再治疗或其他辐射毒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信