Antimicrobial efficacy of chlorhexidine-treated surfaces against clinical isolates implicated in nosocomial infections.

IF 2
Georgia Williams, Micheal Alao, Alexander Brooks, Hannah M Doherty, Patrick J Moynihan, Danesh Moradigaravand, Manuel Banzhaf, Felicity de Cogan, Jack A Bryant
{"title":"Antimicrobial efficacy of chlorhexidine-treated surfaces against clinical isolates implicated in nosocomial infections.","authors":"Georgia Williams, Micheal Alao, Alexander Brooks, Hannah M Doherty, Patrick J Moynihan, Danesh Moradigaravand, Manuel Banzhaf, Felicity de Cogan, Jack A Bryant","doi":"10.1099/jmm.0.002025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction.</b> Bacterial infections and antimicrobial resistance are significant threats to global public health, both of which spread through contamination of solid surfaces. We have previously developed an antimicrobial surface technology that directly bonds the broad-spectrum biocide chlorhexidine to steel surfaces. These surfaces were shown to kill bacteria within minutes of contact and to be effective against bacteria evolved in the laboratory for resistance to chlorhexidine in solution.<b>Hypothesis/Gap Statement.</b> We hypothesized that resistance to these surfaces could exist outside of the naive and chlorhexidine-resistant laboratory strains tested previously. We also sought to test whether strains that were resistant to chlorhexidine in solution were also resistant to chlorhexidine-based antimicrobial surfaces.<b>Aim.</b> To test the efficacy of these surfaces against a range of bacteria isolated from the hospital environment and to compare this to the resistance of these bacteria to chlorhexidine in solution or when dissolved in solid media.<b>Methodology.</b> Ninety-one isolates of mixed bacterial species were obtained from Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham. The isolates, along with laboratory strains of <i>Escherichia coli</i>, <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> and <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>, were tested for sensitivity to chlorhexidine-coated steel surfaces in a 30-min exposure simulated splash assay. Resistance to chlorhexidine in solution was also assayed by solid and broth media MIC assays.<b>Results.</b> We demonstrate that within 30 min of incubation, the surfaces reduced the survival of all 91 isolates. Over 85% of these isolates were killed (exhibiting a 7-8 log reduction compared with control surfaces), whilst 12% experienced a 3-4 log reduction. We also show that resistance to the surfaces did not correlate with resistance to freely diffusible chlorhexidine in liquid or solid media.<b>Conclusion.</b> The results demonstrate the efficacy of chlorhexidine-coated surfaces against a broad range of bacterial isolates from the hospital environment and imply the potential for a mode of exposure to dictate the effectiveness of different antimicrobial resistance mechanisms. Future studies should investigate the genetic mechanisms providing resistance to chlorhexidine-coated surfaces and whether these differ in the capacity to provide resistance to chlorhexidine in different modes of exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":94093,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical microbiology","volume":"74 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12188002/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.002025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Bacterial infections and antimicrobial resistance are significant threats to global public health, both of which spread through contamination of solid surfaces. We have previously developed an antimicrobial surface technology that directly bonds the broad-spectrum biocide chlorhexidine to steel surfaces. These surfaces were shown to kill bacteria within minutes of contact and to be effective against bacteria evolved in the laboratory for resistance to chlorhexidine in solution.Hypothesis/Gap Statement. We hypothesized that resistance to these surfaces could exist outside of the naive and chlorhexidine-resistant laboratory strains tested previously. We also sought to test whether strains that were resistant to chlorhexidine in solution were also resistant to chlorhexidine-based antimicrobial surfaces.Aim. To test the efficacy of these surfaces against a range of bacteria isolated from the hospital environment and to compare this to the resistance of these bacteria to chlorhexidine in solution or when dissolved in solid media.Methodology. Ninety-one isolates of mixed bacterial species were obtained from Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham. The isolates, along with laboratory strains of Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus, were tested for sensitivity to chlorhexidine-coated steel surfaces in a 30-min exposure simulated splash assay. Resistance to chlorhexidine in solution was also assayed by solid and broth media MIC assays.Results. We demonstrate that within 30 min of incubation, the surfaces reduced the survival of all 91 isolates. Over 85% of these isolates were killed (exhibiting a 7-8 log reduction compared with control surfaces), whilst 12% experienced a 3-4 log reduction. We also show that resistance to the surfaces did not correlate with resistance to freely diffusible chlorhexidine in liquid or solid media.Conclusion. The results demonstrate the efficacy of chlorhexidine-coated surfaces against a broad range of bacterial isolates from the hospital environment and imply the potential for a mode of exposure to dictate the effectiveness of different antimicrobial resistance mechanisms. Future studies should investigate the genetic mechanisms providing resistance to chlorhexidine-coated surfaces and whether these differ in the capacity to provide resistance to chlorhexidine in different modes of exposure.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

氯己定处理表面对涉及医院感染的临床分离株的抗菌效果。
介绍。细菌感染和抗菌素耐药性是对全球公共卫生的重大威胁,两者都通过固体表面的污染传播。我们之前开发了一种抗菌表面技术,直接将广谱杀菌剂氯己定粘合到钢表面。这些表面被证明在接触几分钟内就能杀死细菌,并对实验室中对溶液中的氯己定产生耐药性的细菌有效。假设/差距语句。我们假设对这些表面的耐药性可能存在于之前测试的原始和氯己定耐药的实验室菌株之外。我们还试图测试对溶液中氯己定耐药的菌株是否也对氯己定基抗菌表面耐药。测试这些表面对从医院环境中分离的一系列细菌的抗性,并将其与这些细菌对溶液或溶解在固体介质中的氯己定的抗性进行比较。从伯明翰伊丽莎白女王医院分离出91株混合菌。在30分钟暴露模拟飞溅试验中,测试了分离物以及大肠杆菌、铜绿假单胞菌和金黄色葡萄球菌的实验室菌株对氯己定涂层钢表面的敏感性。同时采用固体培养基和肉汤培养基MIC法测定溶液中氯己定的耐药性。我们证明,在30分钟的孵育内,表面降低了所有91个分离株的存活率。超过85%的分离株被杀死(与对照表面相比,减少了7-8个对数),而12%的分离株减少了3-4个对数。我们还发现,在液体或固体介质中,对表面的抗性与对自由扩散的氯己定的抗性无关。结果证明了氯己定涂层表面对医院环境中广泛的细菌分离物的有效性,并暗示了一种暴露模式的潜力,以决定不同抗菌素耐药性机制的有效性。未来的研究应探讨对氯己定涂层表面产生抗性的遗传机制,以及这些机制在不同暴露模式下对氯己定产生抗性的能力是否存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信