Differential Effect of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and SGLT2 Inhibitors on Lower-Extremity Amputation Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study.

Diabetes care Pub Date : 2025-06-25 DOI:10.2337/dc25-0292
Alexander T Hong, Ivan Y Luu, Forest Lin, Laura Shin, Chiu-Hsieh Hsu, Chia-Ding Shih, David G Armstrong, Tze-Woei Tan
{"title":"Differential Effect of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and SGLT2 Inhibitors on Lower-Extremity Amputation Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Alexander T Hong, Ivan Y Luu, Forest Lin, Laura Shin, Chiu-Hsieh Hsu, Chia-Ding Shih, David G Armstrong, Tze-Woei Tan","doi":"10.2337/dc25-0292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the risk of lower-extremity amputations (LEAs) between new users of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) versus sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is).</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used TriNetX, a federated electronic health records network, including adults with type 2 diabetes who initiated GLP-1RAs or SGLT2is between May 2013 and March 2025. Propensity score matching (1:1) was used to balance demographics, comorbidities, medications, and laboratory values. Major (above-ankle) amputation-free survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves, while risks of major and minor LEAs, diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), and mortality were estimated using hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The matched cohorts included 180,740 GLP-1RA and 180,740 SGLT2i recipients. At 3 years, the GLP-1RA cohort was associated with greater major amputation-free survival (99.69% vs. 99.64%, P = 0.001) compared with the SGLT2i cohort. Additionally, GLP-1RA treatment was associated with a lower risk of major LEAs (HR 0.77 [95% CI 0.66, 0.90]), minor LEAs (HR 0.73 [95% CI 0.63, 0.84]), DFUs (HR 0.92 [95% CI 0.87, 0.96]), and mortality (HR 0.66 [95% CI 0.63, 0.69]). Risk reduction for major LEA remained significant in individuals with peripheral artery disease (HR 0.68 [95% CI 0.56, 0.82]) and DFUs (HR 0.70 [95% CI 0.58, 0.84]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GLP-1RA treatment was associated with greater major amputation-free survival compared with SGLT2i in people with type 2 diabetes, particularly in high-risk subgroups. Prospective studies are needed to confirm findings and inform selection of glucose-lowering therapies for people at risk for diabetes-related amputations.</p>","PeriodicalId":93979,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc25-0292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the risk of lower-extremity amputations (LEAs) between new users of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) versus sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is).

Research design and methods: This retrospective cohort study used TriNetX, a federated electronic health records network, including adults with type 2 diabetes who initiated GLP-1RAs or SGLT2is between May 2013 and March 2025. Propensity score matching (1:1) was used to balance demographics, comorbidities, medications, and laboratory values. Major (above-ankle) amputation-free survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves, while risks of major and minor LEAs, diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), and mortality were estimated using hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: The matched cohorts included 180,740 GLP-1RA and 180,740 SGLT2i recipients. At 3 years, the GLP-1RA cohort was associated with greater major amputation-free survival (99.69% vs. 99.64%, P = 0.001) compared with the SGLT2i cohort. Additionally, GLP-1RA treatment was associated with a lower risk of major LEAs (HR 0.77 [95% CI 0.66, 0.90]), minor LEAs (HR 0.73 [95% CI 0.63, 0.84]), DFUs (HR 0.92 [95% CI 0.87, 0.96]), and mortality (HR 0.66 [95% CI 0.63, 0.69]). Risk reduction for major LEA remained significant in individuals with peripheral artery disease (HR 0.68 [95% CI 0.56, 0.82]) and DFUs (HR 0.70 [95% CI 0.58, 0.84]).

Conclusions: GLP-1RA treatment was associated with greater major amputation-free survival compared with SGLT2i in people with type 2 diabetes, particularly in high-risk subgroups. Prospective studies are needed to confirm findings and inform selection of glucose-lowering therapies for people at risk for diabetes-related amputations.

GLP-1受体激动剂和SGLT2抑制剂对2型糖尿病下肢截肢结局的不同影响:一项全国回顾性队列研究
目的:比较新使用胰高血糖素样肽1受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)和钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2is)的患者下肢截肢(LEAs)的风险。研究设计和方法:这项回顾性队列研究使用TriNetX,一个联邦电子健康记录网络,包括在2013年5月至2025年3月期间启动GLP-1RAs或SGLT2is的2型糖尿病成年人。倾向评分匹配(1:1)用于平衡人口统计学、合并症、药物和实验室值。使用Kaplan-Meier曲线评估主要(踝关节以上)无截肢患者的生存率,使用95%置信区间(ci)的风险比(hr)估计主要和次要LEAs、糖尿病足溃疡(DFUs)和死亡率的风险。结果:匹配的队列包括180740名GLP-1RA和180740名SGLT2i接受者。3年时,与SGLT2i组相比,GLP-1RA组的无主要截肢生存率更高(99.69% vs. 99.64%, P = 0.001)。此外,GLP-1RA治疗与较低的主要LEAs (HR 0.77 [95% CI 0.66, 0.90])、次要LEAs (HR 0.73 [95% CI 0.63, 0.84])、DFUs (HR 0.92 [95% CI 0.87, 0.96])和死亡率(HR 0.66 [95% CI 0.63, 0.69])风险相关。外周动脉疾病(HR 0.68 [95% CI 0.56, 0.82])和DFUs (HR 0.70 [95% CI 0.58, 0.84])患者的主要LEA风险降低仍然显著。结论:与SGLT2i相比,GLP-1RA治疗与2型糖尿病患者更大的无截肢生存率相关,特别是在高危亚组中。需要前瞻性研究来证实这些发现,并为糖尿病相关截肢风险人群选择降糖治疗提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
29.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信