Diagnostic Performance of ChatGPT-4o in Detecting Hip Fractures on Pelvic X-rays.

IF 1.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Cureus Pub Date : 2025-06-24 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.7759/cureus.86654
Turgut Emre Erdem, Alper Kirilmaz, Ahmet Fevzi Kekec
{"title":"Diagnostic Performance of ChatGPT-4o in Detecting Hip Fractures on Pelvic X-rays.","authors":"Turgut Emre Erdem, Alper Kirilmaz, Ahmet Fevzi Kekec","doi":"10.7759/cureus.86654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hip fractures are a major orthopedic problem, especially in the elderly population. Hip fractures are usually diagnosed by clinical evaluation and imaging, especially X-rays. In recent years, new approaches to fracture detection have emerged with the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning techniques in medical imaging. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ChatGPT-4o, an artificial intelligence model, in diagnosing hip fractures.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A total of 200 anteroposterior pelvic X-ray images were retrospectively analyzed. Half of the images belonged to patients with surgically confirmed hip fractures, including both displaced and non-displaced types, while the other half represented patients with soft tissue trauma and no fractures. Each image was evaluated by ChatGPT-4o through a standardized prompt, and its predictions (fracture vs. no fracture) were compared against the gold standard diagnoses. Diagnostic performance metrics such as sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, Cohen's kappa, and F1 score were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ChatGPT-4o demonstrated an overall accuracy of 82.5% in detecting hip fractures on pelvic radiographs, with a sensitivity of 78.0% and specificity of 87.0%. PPVs and NPVs were 85.7% and 79.8%, respectively. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.825, indicating good discriminative performance. Among 22 false-negative cases, 68.2% were non-displaced fractures, suggesting the model had greater difficulty identifying subtle radiographic findings. Cohen's kappa coefficient was 0.65, showing substantial agreement with actual diagnoses. Chi-square analysis revealed a strong correlation (χ² = 82.59, <i>P</i> < 0.001), while McNemar's test (<i>P</i> = 0.176) showed no significant asymmetry in error distribution.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ChatGPT-4o shows promising accuracy in identifying hip fractures on pelvic X-rays, especially when fractures are displaced. However, its sensitivity drops significantly for non-displaced fractures, leading to many false negatives. This highlights the need for caution when interpreting negative AI results, particularly when clinical suspicion remains high. While not a replacement for expert assessment, ChatGPT-4o may assist in settings with limited specialist access.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":"17 6","pages":"e86654"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12186573/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.86654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Hip fractures are a major orthopedic problem, especially in the elderly population. Hip fractures are usually diagnosed by clinical evaluation and imaging, especially X-rays. In recent years, new approaches to fracture detection have emerged with the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning techniques in medical imaging. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ChatGPT-4o, an artificial intelligence model, in diagnosing hip fractures.

Methodology: A total of 200 anteroposterior pelvic X-ray images were retrospectively analyzed. Half of the images belonged to patients with surgically confirmed hip fractures, including both displaced and non-displaced types, while the other half represented patients with soft tissue trauma and no fractures. Each image was evaluated by ChatGPT-4o through a standardized prompt, and its predictions (fracture vs. no fracture) were compared against the gold standard diagnoses. Diagnostic performance metrics such as sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, Cohen's kappa, and F1 score were calculated.

Results: ChatGPT-4o demonstrated an overall accuracy of 82.5% in detecting hip fractures on pelvic radiographs, with a sensitivity of 78.0% and specificity of 87.0%. PPVs and NPVs were 85.7% and 79.8%, respectively. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.825, indicating good discriminative performance. Among 22 false-negative cases, 68.2% were non-displaced fractures, suggesting the model had greater difficulty identifying subtle radiographic findings. Cohen's kappa coefficient was 0.65, showing substantial agreement with actual diagnoses. Chi-square analysis revealed a strong correlation (χ² = 82.59, P < 0.001), while McNemar's test (P = 0.176) showed no significant asymmetry in error distribution.

Conclusions: ChatGPT-4o shows promising accuracy in identifying hip fractures on pelvic X-rays, especially when fractures are displaced. However, its sensitivity drops significantly for non-displaced fractures, leading to many false negatives. This highlights the need for caution when interpreting negative AI results, particularly when clinical suspicion remains high. While not a replacement for expert assessment, ChatGPT-4o may assist in settings with limited specialist access.

chatgpt - 40在骨盆x线检查髋部骨折中的诊断价值。
髋部骨折是骨科的一个主要问题,尤其是在老年人群中。髋部骨折通常通过临床评估和影像学诊断,尤其是x光。近年来,随着人工智能(AI)和深度学习技术在医学成像中的应用,出现了新的骨折检测方法。在本研究中,我们旨在评估chatgpt - 40(人工智能模型)在诊断髋部骨折中的诊断性能。方法:回顾性分析200张骨盆正位x线片。一半的图像属于手术证实的髋部骨折患者,包括移位型和非移位型,而另一半则代表软组织创伤和无骨折的患者。chatgpt - 40通过标准化提示对每张图像进行评估,并将其预测(骨折与无骨折)与金标准诊断进行比较。计算诊断性能指标,如敏感性、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)、受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线、Cohen’s kappa、F1评分。结果:chatgpt - 40在骨盆x线片上检测髋部骨折的总体准确率为82.5%,敏感性为78.0%,特异性为87.0%。ppv和npv分别为85.7%和79.8%。ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.825,判别效果良好。在22例假阴性病例中,68.2%为非移位性骨折,表明该模型难以识别细微的x线表现。Cohen的kappa系数为0.65,与实际诊断结果基本一致。χ²= 82.59,P < 0.001), McNemar检验(P = 0.176)显示误差分布不对称。结论:chatgpt - 40在骨盆x线上识别髋部骨折方面显示出良好的准确性,特别是当骨折移位时。然而,对于非移位骨折,其灵敏度明显下降,导致许多假阴性。这强调了在解释人工智能阴性结果时需要谨慎,特别是在临床怀疑仍然很高的情况下。虽然不是专家评估的替代品,但chatgpt - 40可以在专家访问有限的情况下提供帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信