Axial Skeletal Assessment in Osteoporosis Using Radiofrequency Echographic Multi-spectrometry: Diagnostic Performance, Clinical Utility, and Future Directions.

IF 1 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Cureus Pub Date : 2025-06-23 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.7759/cureus.86625
Mohammed As'ad
{"title":"Axial Skeletal Assessment in Osteoporosis Using Radiofrequency Echographic Multi-spectrometry: Diagnostic Performance, Clinical Utility, and Future Directions.","authors":"Mohammed As'ad","doi":"10.7759/cureus.86625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Osteoporosis, a prevalent skeletal disorder, necessitates accurate and accessible diagnostic tools for effective disease management and fracture prevention. While dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) remains the clinical standard for bone mineral density (BMD) assessment, its limitations, including ionizing radiation exposure and susceptibility to artifacts, underscore the need for alternative technologies. Ultrasound-based methods have emerged as promising radiation-free alternatives, with radiofrequency echographic multi-spectrometry (REMS) representing a significant advancement in axial skeleton assessment, specifically at the lumbar spine and proximal femur. REMS analyzes unfiltered radiofrequency ultrasound signals, providing not only BMD estimates but also a novel fragility score (FS), which reflects bone quality and microarchitectural integrity. This review critically evaluates the underlying principles, diagnostic performance, and clinical applications of REMS. It compares REMS with DXA, quantitative computed tomography (QCT), and trabecular bone score (TBS), highlighting REMS's potential advantages in artifact-prone scenarios and specific populations, including children and patients with secondary osteoporosis. The clinical utility of REMS in fracture risk prediction and therapy monitoring is explored alongside its operational precision, cost-effectiveness, and portability. In addition, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) within REMS software has enhanced its capacity for artifact exclusion and automated spectral interpretation, improving usability and reproducibility. Current limitations, such as the need for broader validation and guideline inclusion, are identified, and future research directions are proposed. These include multicenter validation studies, development of pediatric and secondary osteoporosis reference models, and deeper evaluation of AI-driven enhancements. REMS offers a compelling, non-ionizing alternative for axial bone health assessment and may significantly advance the diagnostic landscape for osteoporosis care.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":"17 6","pages":"e86625"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12185786/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.86625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Osteoporosis, a prevalent skeletal disorder, necessitates accurate and accessible diagnostic tools for effective disease management and fracture prevention. While dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) remains the clinical standard for bone mineral density (BMD) assessment, its limitations, including ionizing radiation exposure and susceptibility to artifacts, underscore the need for alternative technologies. Ultrasound-based methods have emerged as promising radiation-free alternatives, with radiofrequency echographic multi-spectrometry (REMS) representing a significant advancement in axial skeleton assessment, specifically at the lumbar spine and proximal femur. REMS analyzes unfiltered radiofrequency ultrasound signals, providing not only BMD estimates but also a novel fragility score (FS), which reflects bone quality and microarchitectural integrity. This review critically evaluates the underlying principles, diagnostic performance, and clinical applications of REMS. It compares REMS with DXA, quantitative computed tomography (QCT), and trabecular bone score (TBS), highlighting REMS's potential advantages in artifact-prone scenarios and specific populations, including children and patients with secondary osteoporosis. The clinical utility of REMS in fracture risk prediction and therapy monitoring is explored alongside its operational precision, cost-effectiveness, and portability. In addition, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) within REMS software has enhanced its capacity for artifact exclusion and automated spectral interpretation, improving usability and reproducibility. Current limitations, such as the need for broader validation and guideline inclusion, are identified, and future research directions are proposed. These include multicenter validation studies, development of pediatric and secondary osteoporosis reference models, and deeper evaluation of AI-driven enhancements. REMS offers a compelling, non-ionizing alternative for axial bone health assessment and may significantly advance the diagnostic landscape for osteoporosis care.

使用射频超声多光谱法评估骨质疏松症的轴向骨骼:诊断性能、临床应用和未来方向。
骨质疏松症是一种常见的骨骼疾病,需要准确和可获得的诊断工具来有效地管理疾病和预防骨折。虽然双能x射线吸收仪(DXA)仍然是骨矿物质密度(BMD)评估的临床标准,但其局限性,包括电离辐射暴露和对人工制品的易感性,强调了对替代技术的需求。基于超声的方法已经成为有前途的无辐射替代方法,射频超声多光谱(REMS)代表了轴向骨骼评估的重大进步,特别是在腰椎和股骨近端。REMS分析未经过滤的射频超声信号,不仅提供BMD估计,还提供新的脆性评分(FS),反映骨质量和微结构完整性。这篇综述批判性地评估了REMS的基本原理、诊断性能和临床应用。该研究将REMS与DXA、定量计算机断层扫描(QCT)和骨小梁评分(TBS)进行了比较,强调了REMS在容易出现伪影的情况和特定人群(包括儿童和继发性骨质疏松症患者)中的潜在优势。REMS在骨折风险预测和治疗监测方面的临床应用,以及其操作精度、成本效益和便携性。此外,人工智能(AI)在REMS软件中的集成增强了其排除伪像和自动光谱解释的能力,提高了可用性和再现性。目前的局限性,如需要更广泛的验证和指南纳入,并提出了未来的研究方向。这些包括多中心验证研究、儿科和继发性骨质疏松参考模型的开发,以及对人工智能驱动的增强功能的更深入评估。REMS为轴骨健康评估提供了一种令人信服的非电离替代方法,并可能显著推进骨质疏松症护理的诊断前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信