Closing in on a Consensus in Identifying, Assessing and Diagnosing Children With Cerebral Visual Impairment.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Acta Paediatrica Pub Date : 2025-06-25 DOI:10.1111/apa.70200
Barbro Lindquist, Christina Westerberg
{"title":"Closing in on a Consensus in Identifying, Assessing and Diagnosing Children With Cerebral Visual Impairment.","authors":"Barbro Lindquist, Christina Westerberg","doi":"10.1111/apa.70200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Lack of global consensus regarding CVI makes assessment and research more difficult. Our aim is to describe current consensus and evident methods for how to identify, assess and diagnose CVI in children.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data-based search on reviews and papers published 2014-2023.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The seven reviews and 23 papers reviewed here jointly convey a broad knowledge on CVI including its definition, assessment tools, and evidence-based methods to diagnose this condition. The definition of CVI as a verifiable visual dysfunction that cannot be attributed to disorders of the anterior visual pathways, or any potentially co-occurring ocular impairment was confirmed. Assessment tools based on Dutton's CVI questionnaire were identified as being most relevant. A diagnosis of CVI should be assessed and established by a multidisciplinary team, following a cognitive assessment. A magnetic resonance imaging scan in addition to the ophthalmological examination can be valuable but is optional and is not on its own sufficient for diagnosis. The neuropsychological assessment must further include tests of visual and visuospatial perception. All assessments should be in co-operation with caregivers and teachers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This scoping review demonstrates satisfactory evidence and consensus needed in order to proceed with general recommendations for assessment and diagnosis of CVI.</p>","PeriodicalId":55562,"journal":{"name":"Acta Paediatrica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Paediatrica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.70200","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Lack of global consensus regarding CVI makes assessment and research more difficult. Our aim is to describe current consensus and evident methods for how to identify, assess and diagnose CVI in children.

Method: Data-based search on reviews and papers published 2014-2023.

Result: The seven reviews and 23 papers reviewed here jointly convey a broad knowledge on CVI including its definition, assessment tools, and evidence-based methods to diagnose this condition. The definition of CVI as a verifiable visual dysfunction that cannot be attributed to disorders of the anterior visual pathways, or any potentially co-occurring ocular impairment was confirmed. Assessment tools based on Dutton's CVI questionnaire were identified as being most relevant. A diagnosis of CVI should be assessed and established by a multidisciplinary team, following a cognitive assessment. A magnetic resonance imaging scan in addition to the ophthalmological examination can be valuable but is optional and is not on its own sufficient for diagnosis. The neuropsychological assessment must further include tests of visual and visuospatial perception. All assessments should be in co-operation with caregivers and teachers.

Conclusion: This scoping review demonstrates satisfactory evidence and consensus needed in order to proceed with general recommendations for assessment and diagnosis of CVI.

在识别、评估和诊断儿童脑视觉障碍方面达成共识。
目的:缺乏关于CVI的全球共识使得评估和研究更加困难。我们的目的是描述目前的共识和明确的方法,如何识别,评估和诊断儿童CVI。方法:基于数据检索2014-2023年发表的综述和论文。结果:本文回顾的7篇综述和23篇论文共同传达了关于CVI的广泛知识,包括其定义、评估工具和基于证据的诊断方法。CVI的定义是一种可证实的视觉功能障碍,不能归因于前视通路障碍,或任何潜在的共同发生的眼部损害。基于Dutton CVI问卷的评估工具被认为是最相关的。CVI的诊断应在认知评估后由多学科团队评估和建立。除了眼科检查外,磁共振成像扫描可能是有价值的,但这是可选的,并且本身不足以诊断。神经心理学评估必须进一步包括视觉和视觉空间感知的测试。所有评估应与护理人员和教师合作进行。结论:本综述展示了令人满意的证据和共识,以便对CVI的评估和诊断提出一般性建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Paediatrica
Acta Paediatrica 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
384
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Paediatrica is a peer-reviewed monthly journal at the forefront of international pediatric research. It covers both clinical and experimental research in all areas of pediatrics including: neonatal medicine developmental medicine adolescent medicine child health and environment psychosomatic pediatrics child health in developing countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信