Improving Subjective Well-Being Through EMDR Therapy among PTSD Patients in Jordan: A Quasi-Experimental Study.

Q1 Psychology
Chronic Stress Pub Date : 2025-06-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/24705470251352627
Rabia H Haddad, Malena M Price, Razan Haddad, Ashraf J Abuejheisheh, Younis H Abuhashish, Ayman M Hamdan-Mansour
{"title":"Improving Subjective Well-Being Through EMDR Therapy among PTSD Patients in Jordan: A Quasi-Experimental Study.","authors":"Rabia H Haddad, Malena M Price, Razan Haddad, Ashraf J Abuejheisheh, Younis H Abuhashish, Ayman M Hamdan-Mansour","doi":"10.1177/24705470251352627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Numerous man-made and naturally occurring incidents cause human suffering, both psychologically and mentally. Such circumstances endanger people's emotional, physical, and social well-being if left untreated or if appropriate intervention is delayed. This trial examines the effectiveness of an Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) intervention on improving the subjective well-being of patients with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in Jordan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The current trial employed the quasi-experimental, interrupted time series design. This includes measuring the subjective well-being (SWB) three times: once before intervention (pre-test) and twice after the intervention (post-tests), including immediately and one-month follow-ups for both the intervention and control group. 70 patients (35 patients for each group) were recruited from a specialized psychiatric trauma healing center in Jordan. The primary outcome variable was measured using the World Health Organization- Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The statistical analysis of repeated measures using ANCOVA revealed significant differences across all time points within subjects [<i>F (</i> <sub>1, 56)</sub> = 5.18, <i>p</i> = .027]. The covariate effect was not controlled and showed statistically significant differences in the SWB across all time points in both interventional and control groups (between subjects) (<i>F</i> <sub>1,56</sub> = 12.41,<i>p</i> = .001). There were no statistical differences in the total mean score of SWB correlated with sociodemographics and health-related factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results suggest that EMDR may be an effective, pragmatic, and acceptable intervention for increasing SWB in patients with PTSD in Jordan. Findings support the continued investment in and adoption of EMDR among participants affected by trauma in the Arab World.</p>","PeriodicalId":52315,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Stress","volume":"9 ","pages":"24705470251352627"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12185944/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Stress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24705470251352627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Numerous man-made and naturally occurring incidents cause human suffering, both psychologically and mentally. Such circumstances endanger people's emotional, physical, and social well-being if left untreated or if appropriate intervention is delayed. This trial examines the effectiveness of an Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) intervention on improving the subjective well-being of patients with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in Jordan.

Methods: The current trial employed the quasi-experimental, interrupted time series design. This includes measuring the subjective well-being (SWB) three times: once before intervention (pre-test) and twice after the intervention (post-tests), including immediately and one-month follow-ups for both the intervention and control group. 70 patients (35 patients for each group) were recruited from a specialized psychiatric trauma healing center in Jordan. The primary outcome variable was measured using the World Health Organization- Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5).

Results: The statistical analysis of repeated measures using ANCOVA revealed significant differences across all time points within subjects [F ( 1, 56) = 5.18, p = .027]. The covariate effect was not controlled and showed statistically significant differences in the SWB across all time points in both interventional and control groups (between subjects) (F 1,56 = 12.41,p = .001). There were no statistical differences in the total mean score of SWB correlated with sociodemographics and health-related factors.

Conclusion: The results suggest that EMDR may be an effective, pragmatic, and acceptable intervention for increasing SWB in patients with PTSD in Jordan. Findings support the continued investment in and adoption of EMDR among participants affected by trauma in the Arab World.

通过EMDR治疗改善约旦PTSD患者的主观幸福感:一项准实验研究。
背景:许多人为和自然发生的事件给人类造成心理和精神上的痛苦。如果不加以治疗或拖延适当的干预,这种情况会危及人们的情感、身体和社会福祉。本试验探讨了眼动脱敏和再处理(EMDR)干预在改善约旦创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)患者主观幸福感方面的有效性。方法:本试验采用准实验、间断时间序列设计。这包括测量主观幸福感(SWB)三次:干预前一次(前测试)和干预后两次(后测试),包括干预组和对照组的立即和一个月的随访。70例患者(每组35例)从约旦一家专门的精神创伤治疗中心招募。主要结果变量使用世界卫生组织五幸福指数(WHO-5)进行测量。结果:使用ANCOVA进行重复测量的统计分析显示,受试者各时间点之间存在显著差异[F (1,56) = 5.18, p = 0.027]。协变量效应未得到控制,并显示干预组和对照组(受试者之间)在所有时间点的主观幸福感差异具有统计学意义(f1,56 = 12.41,p = .001)。主观幸福感总平均分与社会人口统计学和健康相关因素的相关性无统计学差异。结论:在约旦,EMDR可能是一种有效、实用和可接受的干预措施,可以增加PTSD患者的主观幸福感。调查结果支持在阿拉伯世界受创伤影响的参与者中继续投资和采用EMDR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chronic Stress
Chronic Stress Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信