Does the Default Mode Network Mediate an Ongoing Internal Narrative? An Evaluation of Menon's (2023) Hypothesis.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
David Kemmerer
{"title":"Does the Default Mode Network Mediate an Ongoing Internal Narrative? An Evaluation of Menon's (2023) Hypothesis.","authors":"David Kemmerer","doi":"10.1162/jocn.a.66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The default mode network (DMN) is a collection of interconnected transmodal brain regions that is engaged during internally oriented thought processes. It has been linked with multiple functions, including self-referential judgment, social cognition, episodic memory, and semantic memory. In an effort to identify a unitary overarching purpose of the DMN, Menon [Menon, V. 20 years of the default mode network: A review and synthesis. Neuron, 111, 2469-2487, 2023] proposed that it uses its diverse capacities to create an \"ongoing internal narrative\" that represents dynamically shifting frames of thought and develops ontogenetically from self-directed overt speech during childhood. My aim was to evaluate this hypothesis. The core of the hypothesis is the notion of an ongoing internal narrative, but this is open to different interpretations. If it is interpreted rather narrowly as referring to a story-like stream of inner speech (IS), then Menon's hypothesis faces at least five challenges. First, regarding its developmental assumptions, research suggests that IS does not originate from self-directed overt speech. Second, there are huge individual differences in the frequency of IS, which implies that if the DMN does mediate an internal narrative, this narrative is not ongoing for everyone; instead, its rate of occurrence varies greatly across the population. Third, rodents and nonhuman primates possess a putative DMN, but they lack language and hence also IS, so the function of their DMN is left unclear. Fourth, IS often has a condensed, note-like form rather than being experienced as a full-fledged narrative. And fifth, so far only a couple neuroscientific studies support DMN engagement during IS. It is also possible, however, to interpret Menon's key notion of an ongoing internal narrative more broadly as involving a coherent sequence of situation models that are strongly influenced by language but not completely dependent on it. This interpretation not only obviates most of the problems just mentioned but also brings Menon's hypothesis more in line with other recent proposals regarding the DMN. Further work is needed, however, to refine and test this version of the hypothesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":51081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.a.66","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The default mode network (DMN) is a collection of interconnected transmodal brain regions that is engaged during internally oriented thought processes. It has been linked with multiple functions, including self-referential judgment, social cognition, episodic memory, and semantic memory. In an effort to identify a unitary overarching purpose of the DMN, Menon [Menon, V. 20 years of the default mode network: A review and synthesis. Neuron, 111, 2469-2487, 2023] proposed that it uses its diverse capacities to create an "ongoing internal narrative" that represents dynamically shifting frames of thought and develops ontogenetically from self-directed overt speech during childhood. My aim was to evaluate this hypothesis. The core of the hypothesis is the notion of an ongoing internal narrative, but this is open to different interpretations. If it is interpreted rather narrowly as referring to a story-like stream of inner speech (IS), then Menon's hypothesis faces at least five challenges. First, regarding its developmental assumptions, research suggests that IS does not originate from self-directed overt speech. Second, there are huge individual differences in the frequency of IS, which implies that if the DMN does mediate an internal narrative, this narrative is not ongoing for everyone; instead, its rate of occurrence varies greatly across the population. Third, rodents and nonhuman primates possess a putative DMN, but they lack language and hence also IS, so the function of their DMN is left unclear. Fourth, IS often has a condensed, note-like form rather than being experienced as a full-fledged narrative. And fifth, so far only a couple neuroscientific studies support DMN engagement during IS. It is also possible, however, to interpret Menon's key notion of an ongoing internal narrative more broadly as involving a coherent sequence of situation models that are strongly influenced by language but not completely dependent on it. This interpretation not only obviates most of the problems just mentioned but also brings Menon's hypothesis more in line with other recent proposals regarding the DMN. Further work is needed, however, to refine and test this version of the hypothesis.

默认模式网络是否调解正在进行的内部叙述?对Menon(2023)假说的评价
默认模式网络(DMN)是在内部导向思维过程中参与的相互关联的跨模式大脑区域的集合。它与多种功能有关,包括自我参照判断、社会认知、情景记忆和语义记忆。在努力确定DMN的一个统一的总体目的,Menon [Menon, V.]默认模式网络的20年:回顾和综合。神经元,111,2469-2487,2023]提出,它使用其多样化的能力来创建一个“持续的内部叙事”,代表动态变化的思维框架,并从儿童时期自我导向的公开语言发展到个体。我的目的是评估这个假设。该假说的核心是一个持续的内部叙事的概念,但这是开放的不同解释。如果将其狭义地解释为指一种类似故事的内在言语流(is),那么Menon的假设至少面临五个挑战。首先,关于其发展假设,研究表明IS并非起源于自我导向的公开言论。其次,IS的频率存在巨大的个体差异,这意味着如果DMN确实调解了内部叙事,那么这种叙事并不是对每个人都持续进行的;相反,它的发生率在人群中差异很大。第三,啮齿类动物和非人类灵长类动物拥有一个假定的DMN,但它们没有语言,因此也没有IS,因此它们的DMN的功能尚不清楚。第四,IS通常是一种浓缩的、类似笔记的形式,而不是一种完整的叙述。第五,到目前为止,只有几项神经科学研究支持IS期间DMN的参与。然而,也有可能将Menon关于持续的内部叙述的关键概念更广泛地解释为涉及受语言强烈影响但不完全依赖于语言的连贯的情景模型序列。这种解释不仅消除了刚才提到的大部分问题,而且使Menon的假设与最近其他关于DMN的建议更加一致。然而,需要进一步的工作来完善和检验这一假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.10%
发文量
151
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience investigates brain–behavior interaction and promotes lively interchange among the mind sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信