Dehiscence of Cruroplasty after Gastric Sleeve: Prevention Based on Proper Surgical Technique.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Yeray Trujillo Loli, Camila Luna Centeno, Armando Romeo, William Kondo, Juan Pablo Aparco, Alexandra Puruguay Haro
{"title":"Dehiscence of Cruroplasty after Gastric Sleeve: Prevention Based on Proper Surgical Technique.","authors":"Yeray Trujillo Loli, Camila Luna Centeno, Armando Romeo, William Kondo, Juan Pablo Aparco, Alexandra Puruguay Haro","doi":"10.1089/lap.2025.0097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> To identify the safest and most effective knot-tying sequences for cruroplasty after gastric sleeve surgery, aiming to reduce recurrence risk. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> A total of 38 knot-tying sequences were tested using a dynamometer and nonabsorbable sutures. These were divided into four groups: Silk 0 (8 sequences), Silk 2/0 (12), Nylon 1 (12), and Polypropylene 2/0 (14). Each sequence was randomly selected and evaluated based on the average tensile strength of 10 tied knots. <b><i>Results:</i></b> For Silk 2/0, the strongest sequences were H3H2a (46.39 N) and H2H1aH1aH1aH1a (45.89 N); the weakest were SSbSb (22.28 N) and SSbSbSb (24.18 N). For Silk 0, H3H2a (72.44 N) and H3H2s (70.48 N) were most resistant, while H1H1sH1sH1sH1s (56.6 N) had the lowest strength. With Nylon 1, H2H1sH1sH1sH1sH1s and H2H1aH1aH1aH1aH1aH1a had the highest strengths; SSbSbSb (29.38 N) was weakest. Polypropylene 2/0 sequences showed consistent strength, with H2H1aH1aH1aH1a (48.91 N) being the strongest. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> For Silks 0 and 2/0, at least three half-knots (H1H1H1) are recommended. Starting with a double knot (H2) offers no added benefit. Slip knots should include a minimum of five throws. For Nylon 1, six-throw sequences are optimal; fewer than four throws are not recommended. Polypropylene 2/0 showed uniform performance across sequences. Knot symmetry did not significantly affect strength in any group. All recommended sequences exceed the 43 N threshold needed to prevent cruroplasty dehiscence under normal intra-abdominal pressures.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2025.0097","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify the safest and most effective knot-tying sequences for cruroplasty after gastric sleeve surgery, aiming to reduce recurrence risk. Materials and Methods: A total of 38 knot-tying sequences were tested using a dynamometer and nonabsorbable sutures. These were divided into four groups: Silk 0 (8 sequences), Silk 2/0 (12), Nylon 1 (12), and Polypropylene 2/0 (14). Each sequence was randomly selected and evaluated based on the average tensile strength of 10 tied knots. Results: For Silk 2/0, the strongest sequences were H3H2a (46.39 N) and H2H1aH1aH1aH1a (45.89 N); the weakest were SSbSb (22.28 N) and SSbSbSb (24.18 N). For Silk 0, H3H2a (72.44 N) and H3H2s (70.48 N) were most resistant, while H1H1sH1sH1sH1s (56.6 N) had the lowest strength. With Nylon 1, H2H1sH1sH1sH1sH1s and H2H1aH1aH1aH1aH1aH1a had the highest strengths; SSbSbSb (29.38 N) was weakest. Polypropylene 2/0 sequences showed consistent strength, with H2H1aH1aH1aH1a (48.91 N) being the strongest. Conclusions: For Silks 0 and 2/0, at least three half-knots (H1H1H1) are recommended. Starting with a double knot (H2) offers no added benefit. Slip knots should include a minimum of five throws. For Nylon 1, six-throw sequences are optimal; fewer than four throws are not recommended. Polypropylene 2/0 showed uniform performance across sequences. Knot symmetry did not significantly affect strength in any group. All recommended sequences exceed the 43 N threshold needed to prevent cruroplasty dehiscence under normal intra-abdominal pressures.

胃套管成形术后胃囊破裂:基于适当手术技术的预防。
目的:探讨胃袖术后最安全、最有效的结扎方案,以降低复发风险。材料和方法:使用测力计和不可吸收缝线对38个打结序列进行测试。这些序列分为四组:Silk 0(8个序列)、Silk 2/0(12个序列)、Nylon 1(12个序列)和Polypropylene 2/0(14个序列)。随机选择每个序列,并根据10个结的平均抗拉强度进行评估。结果:Silk 2/0的最强序列为H3H2a (46.39 N)和H2H1aH1aH1aH1a (45.89 N);最弱的是SSbSb (22.28 N)和SSbSbSb (24.18 N)。蚕丝0抗性最强的是H3H2a (72.44 N)和H3H2s (70.48 N),抗性最低的是H1H1sH1sH1sH1s (56.6 N)。在尼龙1中,H2H1sH1sH1sH1sH1s和h2h1ah1ah1ah1ah1a的强度最高;SSbSbSb (29.38 N)最弱。聚丙烯2/0序列强度一致,以H2H1aH1aH1aH1a (48.91 N)最强。结论:对于丝绸0和2/0,建议至少三个半结(H1H1H1)。从双结(H2)开始没有额外的好处。溜绳结应包括至少五次投掷。对于尼龙1,六次投掷序列是最佳的;不建议少于四次投掷。聚丙烯2/0表现出均匀的跨序列性能。在任何组中,结的对称性对强度都没有显著影响。所有推荐的序列都超过43 N阈值,以防止在正常腹内压下成形术破裂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信